Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Who’s been to a Wal-Mart Super Center?
- This topic has 270 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 27, 2009 at 9:15 PM #475302October 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM #474464
Trojan4Life
ParticipantI think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…
October 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM #474641Trojan4Life
ParticipantI think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…
October 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM #475005Trojan4Life
ParticipantI think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…
October 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM #475082Trojan4Life
ParticipantI think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…
October 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM #475308Trojan4Life
ParticipantI think if Walmart’s 1.5 million US associates were affected by the 12% unemployment rate, we’d be in even a worse mess. I have 500-600 people apply for every vacant job we post. We are not the problem, Captcha…
October 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM #474489Trojan4Life
ParticipantSMShorttimer,
It’s a different Walmart today, but it depends on what time you go. 8am is best time, of course if you go at 7pm the store has been “shopped hard” by thousands and isn’t the most pristine shopping experience.
October 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM #474666Trojan4Life
ParticipantSMShorttimer,
It’s a different Walmart today, but it depends on what time you go. 8am is best time, of course if you go at 7pm the store has been “shopped hard” by thousands and isn’t the most pristine shopping experience.
October 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM #475030Trojan4Life
ParticipantSMShorttimer,
It’s a different Walmart today, but it depends on what time you go. 8am is best time, of course if you go at 7pm the store has been “shopped hard” by thousands and isn’t the most pristine shopping experience.
October 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM #475107Trojan4Life
ParticipantSMShorttimer,
It’s a different Walmart today, but it depends on what time you go. 8am is best time, of course if you go at 7pm the store has been “shopped hard” by thousands and isn’t the most pristine shopping experience.
October 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM #475333Trojan4Life
ParticipantSMShorttimer,
It’s a different Walmart today, but it depends on what time you go. 8am is best time, of course if you go at 7pm the store has been “shopped hard” by thousands and isn’t the most pristine shopping experience.
October 27, 2009 at 10:09 PM #474499all
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think the quote by Lee Scott, former CEO of Walmart spoke best to this when he said “Out of 4,000 stores there are some knuckle-headed store managers who do things the wrong way. When we find out about it, we fix it” (paraphrased).
I think Walmart has changed with the times and certainly is not practicing the same archaic personnel policies that got them a bad reputation. I think that a large part of that was how store manager’s bonus pay was calculated, it encouraged them to cheat people. It has been altered now to include other factors. I think overall there’s just a better breed of manager coming into the company, we now have pick of the best with the recession going on.
FYI our average hourly wage in CA is north of $11 and MANY hourly associates in our stores earn much more than that. We also have many associates who are 10,15,20-35 years with the company. Walmart has made many of those “lower” paid associates MILLIONAIRES with the company’s stock purchase plan. They have always shared their success with the associates.
I think if you go into a newly remodeled Walmart store you would probably change your opinion about the company.[/quote]
Got it. A company with celebrated, almost legendary intelligence gathering (did not help much in Germany, IIRC), one that can calculate suppliers’ margins better than the suppliers themselves failed to recognize the systemic abuse of the employees by the management. Totally believable.
Your numbers are meaningless. How many is “MANY”? What is the structure (position, years of experience, hours worked/week, benefits) of your hourly employees? How do you calculate the average? How many is ‘many’ (in case of employees with 35 years and in case of MILLIONAIRES)?
The fact that you (personally?) have 500-600 applicants for a minimum wage position witnesses the sad state of the society.
October 27, 2009 at 10:09 PM #474676all
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think the quote by Lee Scott, former CEO of Walmart spoke best to this when he said “Out of 4,000 stores there are some knuckle-headed store managers who do things the wrong way. When we find out about it, we fix it” (paraphrased).
I think Walmart has changed with the times and certainly is not practicing the same archaic personnel policies that got them a bad reputation. I think that a large part of that was how store manager’s bonus pay was calculated, it encouraged them to cheat people. It has been altered now to include other factors. I think overall there’s just a better breed of manager coming into the company, we now have pick of the best with the recession going on.
FYI our average hourly wage in CA is north of $11 and MANY hourly associates in our stores earn much more than that. We also have many associates who are 10,15,20-35 years with the company. Walmart has made many of those “lower” paid associates MILLIONAIRES with the company’s stock purchase plan. They have always shared their success with the associates.
I think if you go into a newly remodeled Walmart store you would probably change your opinion about the company.[/quote]
Got it. A company with celebrated, almost legendary intelligence gathering (did not help much in Germany, IIRC), one that can calculate suppliers’ margins better than the suppliers themselves failed to recognize the systemic abuse of the employees by the management. Totally believable.
Your numbers are meaningless. How many is “MANY”? What is the structure (position, years of experience, hours worked/week, benefits) of your hourly employees? How do you calculate the average? How many is ‘many’ (in case of employees with 35 years and in case of MILLIONAIRES)?
The fact that you (personally?) have 500-600 applicants for a minimum wage position witnesses the sad state of the society.
October 27, 2009 at 10:09 PM #475040all
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think the quote by Lee Scott, former CEO of Walmart spoke best to this when he said “Out of 4,000 stores there are some knuckle-headed store managers who do things the wrong way. When we find out about it, we fix it” (paraphrased).
I think Walmart has changed with the times and certainly is not practicing the same archaic personnel policies that got them a bad reputation. I think that a large part of that was how store manager’s bonus pay was calculated, it encouraged them to cheat people. It has been altered now to include other factors. I think overall there’s just a better breed of manager coming into the company, we now have pick of the best with the recession going on.
FYI our average hourly wage in CA is north of $11 and MANY hourly associates in our stores earn much more than that. We also have many associates who are 10,15,20-35 years with the company. Walmart has made many of those “lower” paid associates MILLIONAIRES with the company’s stock purchase plan. They have always shared their success with the associates.
I think if you go into a newly remodeled Walmart store you would probably change your opinion about the company.[/quote]
Got it. A company with celebrated, almost legendary intelligence gathering (did not help much in Germany, IIRC), one that can calculate suppliers’ margins better than the suppliers themselves failed to recognize the systemic abuse of the employees by the management. Totally believable.
Your numbers are meaningless. How many is “MANY”? What is the structure (position, years of experience, hours worked/week, benefits) of your hourly employees? How do you calculate the average? How many is ‘many’ (in case of employees with 35 years and in case of MILLIONAIRES)?
The fact that you (personally?) have 500-600 applicants for a minimum wage position witnesses the sad state of the society.
October 27, 2009 at 10:09 PM #475116all
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]I think the quote by Lee Scott, former CEO of Walmart spoke best to this when he said “Out of 4,000 stores there are some knuckle-headed store managers who do things the wrong way. When we find out about it, we fix it” (paraphrased).
I think Walmart has changed with the times and certainly is not practicing the same archaic personnel policies that got them a bad reputation. I think that a large part of that was how store manager’s bonus pay was calculated, it encouraged them to cheat people. It has been altered now to include other factors. I think overall there’s just a better breed of manager coming into the company, we now have pick of the best with the recession going on.
FYI our average hourly wage in CA is north of $11 and MANY hourly associates in our stores earn much more than that. We also have many associates who are 10,15,20-35 years with the company. Walmart has made many of those “lower” paid associates MILLIONAIRES with the company’s stock purchase plan. They have always shared their success with the associates.
I think if you go into a newly remodeled Walmart store you would probably change your opinion about the company.[/quote]
Got it. A company with celebrated, almost legendary intelligence gathering (did not help much in Germany, IIRC), one that can calculate suppliers’ margins better than the suppliers themselves failed to recognize the systemic abuse of the employees by the management. Totally believable.
Your numbers are meaningless. How many is “MANY”? What is the structure (position, years of experience, hours worked/week, benefits) of your hourly employees? How do you calculate the average? How many is ‘many’ (in case of employees with 35 years and in case of MILLIONAIRES)?
The fact that you (personally?) have 500-600 applicants for a minimum wage position witnesses the sad state of the society.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.