- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 8, 2010 at 11:26 PM #17020February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511053
UCGal
ParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511200UCGal
ParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511612UCGal
ParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511706UCGal
ParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511956UCGal
ParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511058NotCranky
Participantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511205NotCranky
Participantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511617NotCranky
Participantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511711NotCranky
Participantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511961NotCranky
Participantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511211afirsthomeowner
ParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511358afirsthomeowner
ParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511771afirsthomeowner
ParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511864afirsthomeowner
ParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
