- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 8, 2010 at 11:26 PM #17020February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511053UCGalParticipant
Do they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511956UCGalParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511706UCGalParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511612UCGalParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM #511200UCGalParticipantDo they have the same dates?
Sometimes you have back to back sales in very short order… Bank forecloses and it either sells at trustee sale or bank takes it back… that’s typically a lower price. Then if it was bought at trustee sale – the buyer lists it and sells it at market price. This can literally be just a few weeks.
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511961NotCrankyParticipantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511058NotCrankyParticipantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511205NotCrankyParticipantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511617NotCrankyParticipantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511711NotCrankyParticipantdeleted
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511211afirsthomeownerParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511358afirsthomeownerParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #512116afirsthomeownerParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511771afirsthomeownerParticipantThanks UCGal for your quick feedback. For the sold dates, they are different. But what surprised me is the first sold price (public record, dated one week earlier) is higher, for which I thought the house was bought back by the Bank, than the listed sold price (based on MLS)… I kind get confused by that…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.