- This topic has 125 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
djrobsd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2008 at 9:02 AM #13301July 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM #239607
gdcox
ParticipantThis accords. What we need is a banking expert to advise when a foreclosed property has to be marked down. If it is only when it is sold and in the meantime it is valued at the valuation at time of mortgage issue, these games would be explainable.
July 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM #239745gdcox
ParticipantThis accords. What we need is a banking expert to advise when a foreclosed property has to be marked down. If it is only when it is sold and in the meantime it is valued at the valuation at time of mortgage issue, these games would be explainable.
July 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM #239749gdcox
ParticipantThis accords. What we need is a banking expert to advise when a foreclosed property has to be marked down. If it is only when it is sold and in the meantime it is valued at the valuation at time of mortgage issue, these games would be explainable.
July 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM #239804gdcox
ParticipantThis accords. What we need is a banking expert to advise when a foreclosed property has to be marked down. If it is only when it is sold and in the meantime it is valued at the valuation at time of mortgage issue, these games would be explainable.
July 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM #239812gdcox
ParticipantThis accords. What we need is a banking expert to advise when a foreclosed property has to be marked down. If it is only when it is sold and in the meantime it is valued at the valuation at time of mortgage issue, these games would be explainable.
July 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM #239617nostradamus
ParticipantMaybe they figure a slow, downhill run is better than dumping it all on the market at once. Maybe they’re holding out so all the people responsible for this mess can jump out with their golden parachutes leaving the next generation of bankers on the hook. Maybe they want to create an artificial demand by reducing inventory (easy, since they hold much of the inventory). Maybe they don’t want their buddies in office to look bad so are waiting for the next administration to take over.
We the people are going to end up owning those homes if the FDIC takes over the banks with lots of REO inventory. If you have over $100k in a bank taken over by the FDIC, you get a share of the liquidated assets. So you do get something back, in this case it might be a house!!!
July 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM #239755nostradamus
ParticipantMaybe they figure a slow, downhill run is better than dumping it all on the market at once. Maybe they’re holding out so all the people responsible for this mess can jump out with their golden parachutes leaving the next generation of bankers on the hook. Maybe they want to create an artificial demand by reducing inventory (easy, since they hold much of the inventory). Maybe they don’t want their buddies in office to look bad so are waiting for the next administration to take over.
We the people are going to end up owning those homes if the FDIC takes over the banks with lots of REO inventory. If you have over $100k in a bank taken over by the FDIC, you get a share of the liquidated assets. So you do get something back, in this case it might be a house!!!
July 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM #239759nostradamus
ParticipantMaybe they figure a slow, downhill run is better than dumping it all on the market at once. Maybe they’re holding out so all the people responsible for this mess can jump out with their golden parachutes leaving the next generation of bankers on the hook. Maybe they want to create an artificial demand by reducing inventory (easy, since they hold much of the inventory). Maybe they don’t want their buddies in office to look bad so are waiting for the next administration to take over.
We the people are going to end up owning those homes if the FDIC takes over the banks with lots of REO inventory. If you have over $100k in a bank taken over by the FDIC, you get a share of the liquidated assets. So you do get something back, in this case it might be a house!!!
July 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM #239814nostradamus
ParticipantMaybe they figure a slow, downhill run is better than dumping it all on the market at once. Maybe they’re holding out so all the people responsible for this mess can jump out with their golden parachutes leaving the next generation of bankers on the hook. Maybe they want to create an artificial demand by reducing inventory (easy, since they hold much of the inventory). Maybe they don’t want their buddies in office to look bad so are waiting for the next administration to take over.
We the people are going to end up owning those homes if the FDIC takes over the banks with lots of REO inventory. If you have over $100k in a bank taken over by the FDIC, you get a share of the liquidated assets. So you do get something back, in this case it might be a house!!!
July 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM #239822nostradamus
ParticipantMaybe they figure a slow, downhill run is better than dumping it all on the market at once. Maybe they’re holding out so all the people responsible for this mess can jump out with their golden parachutes leaving the next generation of bankers on the hook. Maybe they want to create an artificial demand by reducing inventory (easy, since they hold much of the inventory). Maybe they don’t want their buddies in office to look bad so are waiting for the next administration to take over.
We the people are going to end up owning those homes if the FDIC takes over the banks with lots of REO inventory. If you have over $100k in a bank taken over by the FDIC, you get a share of the liquidated assets. So you do get something back, in this case it might be a house!!!
July 15, 2008 at 12:01 PM #239682peterb
ParticipantI suspected this was going on. I’ve posted about the lenders not wanting to take the hit on their books so they just turn a blind eye to the loans not performing. And they try not to sell too many homes in any given quarter.
So maybe there’s a way to see how many home loans are in “non performing” status.i.e..they have not made a payment in 3 months.July 15, 2008 at 12:01 PM #239820peterb
ParticipantI suspected this was going on. I’ve posted about the lenders not wanting to take the hit on their books so they just turn a blind eye to the loans not performing. And they try not to sell too many homes in any given quarter.
So maybe there’s a way to see how many home loans are in “non performing” status.i.e..they have not made a payment in 3 months.July 15, 2008 at 12:01 PM #239824peterb
ParticipantI suspected this was going on. I’ve posted about the lenders not wanting to take the hit on their books so they just turn a blind eye to the loans not performing. And they try not to sell too many homes in any given quarter.
So maybe there’s a way to see how many home loans are in “non performing” status.i.e..they have not made a payment in 3 months.July 15, 2008 at 12:01 PM #239881peterb
ParticipantI suspected this was going on. I’ve posted about the lenders not wanting to take the hit on their books so they just turn a blind eye to the loans not performing. And they try not to sell too many homes in any given quarter.
So maybe there’s a way to see how many home loans are in “non performing” status.i.e..they have not made a payment in 3 months. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
