Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › What we need is regulation
- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 13, 2008 at 5:54 PM #14202October 13, 2008 at 8:21 PM #286942no_such_realityParticipant
I have an idea.
Let’s regulate Joe Sixpack.
You see, Joe Sixpack is the problem.
Joe Sixpack borrowed the money.
Joe Sixpack can’t pay it back.
Simple solution, Joe Sixpack doesn’t get to borrow any more…
Oh wait, Joe Sixpack won’t admit he’s the real culprit. Oh no, it’s greedy wall street bankers, not Joe Sixpack. Joe Sixpack just wanted his house to buy him a whole remodel, and a boob job for the wife, and a new SUV, and a big Z71 truck, and boat.
October 13, 2008 at 8:21 PM #287238no_such_realityParticipantI have an idea.
Let’s regulate Joe Sixpack.
You see, Joe Sixpack is the problem.
Joe Sixpack borrowed the money.
Joe Sixpack can’t pay it back.
Simple solution, Joe Sixpack doesn’t get to borrow any more…
Oh wait, Joe Sixpack won’t admit he’s the real culprit. Oh no, it’s greedy wall street bankers, not Joe Sixpack. Joe Sixpack just wanted his house to buy him a whole remodel, and a boob job for the wife, and a new SUV, and a big Z71 truck, and boat.
October 13, 2008 at 8:21 PM #287257no_such_realityParticipantI have an idea.
Let’s regulate Joe Sixpack.
You see, Joe Sixpack is the problem.
Joe Sixpack borrowed the money.
Joe Sixpack can’t pay it back.
Simple solution, Joe Sixpack doesn’t get to borrow any more…
Oh wait, Joe Sixpack won’t admit he’s the real culprit. Oh no, it’s greedy wall street bankers, not Joe Sixpack. Joe Sixpack just wanted his house to buy him a whole remodel, and a boob job for the wife, and a new SUV, and a big Z71 truck, and boat.
October 13, 2008 at 8:21 PM #287281no_such_realityParticipantI have an idea.
Let’s regulate Joe Sixpack.
You see, Joe Sixpack is the problem.
Joe Sixpack borrowed the money.
Joe Sixpack can’t pay it back.
Simple solution, Joe Sixpack doesn’t get to borrow any more…
Oh wait, Joe Sixpack won’t admit he’s the real culprit. Oh no, it’s greedy wall street bankers, not Joe Sixpack. Joe Sixpack just wanted his house to buy him a whole remodel, and a boob job for the wife, and a new SUV, and a big Z71 truck, and boat.
October 13, 2008 at 8:21 PM #287286no_such_realityParticipantI have an idea.
Let’s regulate Joe Sixpack.
You see, Joe Sixpack is the problem.
Joe Sixpack borrowed the money.
Joe Sixpack can’t pay it back.
Simple solution, Joe Sixpack doesn’t get to borrow any more…
Oh wait, Joe Sixpack won’t admit he’s the real culprit. Oh no, it’s greedy wall street bankers, not Joe Sixpack. Joe Sixpack just wanted his house to buy him a whole remodel, and a boob job for the wife, and a new SUV, and a big Z71 truck, and boat.
October 16, 2008 at 9:54 AM #288374jpinpbParticipantIt’s cyclical as underdose suggested. Joe Sixpack may not want to admit he’s the real culprit, but if the banks were careful in who they loaned the money to, i.e., making sure Joe Sixpack could pay it back, then we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Regardless of how Joe Sixpack squandered his winnings, recklessly pumping money into the economy, he wouldn’t have the money in the first place if the banks checked into the capability and risk-factor of Joe Sixpack.
It ultimately does rest w/the bank. Joe Sixpack wasn’t going to turn down free money if some stupid bank was going to give it to him. Joe Sixpack isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed – or maybe he is.
October 16, 2008 at 9:54 AM #288407jpinpbParticipantIt’s cyclical as underdose suggested. Joe Sixpack may not want to admit he’s the real culprit, but if the banks were careful in who they loaned the money to, i.e., making sure Joe Sixpack could pay it back, then we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Regardless of how Joe Sixpack squandered his winnings, recklessly pumping money into the economy, he wouldn’t have the money in the first place if the banks checked into the capability and risk-factor of Joe Sixpack.
It ultimately does rest w/the bank. Joe Sixpack wasn’t going to turn down free money if some stupid bank was going to give it to him. Joe Sixpack isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed – or maybe he is.
October 16, 2008 at 9:54 AM #288403jpinpbParticipantIt’s cyclical as underdose suggested. Joe Sixpack may not want to admit he’s the real culprit, but if the banks were careful in who they loaned the money to, i.e., making sure Joe Sixpack could pay it back, then we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Regardless of how Joe Sixpack squandered his winnings, recklessly pumping money into the economy, he wouldn’t have the money in the first place if the banks checked into the capability and risk-factor of Joe Sixpack.
It ultimately does rest w/the bank. Joe Sixpack wasn’t going to turn down free money if some stupid bank was going to give it to him. Joe Sixpack isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed – or maybe he is.
October 16, 2008 at 9:54 AM #288360jpinpbParticipantIt’s cyclical as underdose suggested. Joe Sixpack may not want to admit he’s the real culprit, but if the banks were careful in who they loaned the money to, i.e., making sure Joe Sixpack could pay it back, then we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Regardless of how Joe Sixpack squandered his winnings, recklessly pumping money into the economy, he wouldn’t have the money in the first place if the banks checked into the capability and risk-factor of Joe Sixpack.
It ultimately does rest w/the bank. Joe Sixpack wasn’t going to turn down free money if some stupid bank was going to give it to him. Joe Sixpack isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed – or maybe he is.
October 16, 2008 at 9:54 AM #288058jpinpbParticipantIt’s cyclical as underdose suggested. Joe Sixpack may not want to admit he’s the real culprit, but if the banks were careful in who they loaned the money to, i.e., making sure Joe Sixpack could pay it back, then we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Regardless of how Joe Sixpack squandered his winnings, recklessly pumping money into the economy, he wouldn’t have the money in the first place if the banks checked into the capability and risk-factor of Joe Sixpack.
It ultimately does rest w/the bank. Joe Sixpack wasn’t going to turn down free money if some stupid bank was going to give it to him. Joe Sixpack isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed – or maybe he is.
October 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM #288375peterbParticipantHere’s a little known fact: Look at the amount of investigators the IRS has hired or had as staff for the last 8 years. Kinda says it all. But Obama will probably change that. So we all have to play it a lot safer in the near future.
October 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM #288390peterbParticipantHere’s a little known fact: Look at the amount of investigators the IRS has hired or had as staff for the last 8 years. Kinda says it all. But Obama will probably change that. So we all have to play it a lot safer in the near future.
October 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM #288073peterbParticipantHere’s a little known fact: Look at the amount of investigators the IRS has hired or had as staff for the last 8 years. Kinda says it all. But Obama will probably change that. So we all have to play it a lot safer in the near future.
October 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM #288418peterbParticipantHere’s a little known fact: Look at the amount of investigators the IRS has hired or had as staff for the last 8 years. Kinda says it all. But Obama will probably change that. So we all have to play it a lot safer in the near future.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.