- This topic has 90 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by ibjames.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM #14868January 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM #331646hugoParticipant
Here’s an article from todays UT. Some zips are still holding up well, so I guess it depends on location. My wife and I looked at a house in SB this weekend – very run down with significant highway noise – asking 1.1M. I thought the listing agent was crazy to set that price – but perhaps the market will prove him sane.
January 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM #332087hugoParticipantHere’s an article from todays UT. Some zips are still holding up well, so I guess it depends on location. My wife and I looked at a house in SB this weekend – very run down with significant highway noise – asking 1.1M. I thought the listing agent was crazy to set that price – but perhaps the market will prove him sane.
January 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM #332060hugoParticipantHere’s an article from todays UT. Some zips are still holding up well, so I guess it depends on location. My wife and I looked at a house in SB this weekend – very run down with significant highway noise – asking 1.1M. I thought the listing agent was crazy to set that price – but perhaps the market will prove him sane.
January 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM #332171hugoParticipantHere’s an article from todays UT. Some zips are still holding up well, so I guess it depends on location. My wife and I looked at a house in SB this weekend – very run down with significant highway noise – asking 1.1M. I thought the listing agent was crazy to set that price – but perhaps the market will prove him sane.
January 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM #331984hugoParticipantHere’s an article from todays UT. Some zips are still holding up well, so I guess it depends on location. My wife and I looked at a house in SB this weekend – very run down with significant highway noise – asking 1.1M. I thought the listing agent was crazy to set that price – but perhaps the market will prove him sane.
January 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM #331994UCGalParticipantThat article is surprising… I clicked on the graphic to see that UC is in the appreciating catagory… that surprises me because homes for sale, at least in south UC, seem to stay on the market for quite a while. During the peak it seemed like the $1Million price tag was not unusual – and now most listings are in a more realistic range.
I’m glad I’m not selling or buying in this market.
January 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM #332097UCGalParticipantThat article is surprising… I clicked on the graphic to see that UC is in the appreciating catagory… that surprises me because homes for sale, at least in south UC, seem to stay on the market for quite a while. During the peak it seemed like the $1Million price tag was not unusual – and now most listings are in a more realistic range.
I’m glad I’m not selling or buying in this market.
January 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM #332070UCGalParticipantThat article is surprising… I clicked on the graphic to see that UC is in the appreciating catagory… that surprises me because homes for sale, at least in south UC, seem to stay on the market for quite a while. During the peak it seemed like the $1Million price tag was not unusual – and now most listings are in a more realistic range.
I’m glad I’m not selling or buying in this market.
January 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM #332181UCGalParticipantThat article is surprising… I clicked on the graphic to see that UC is in the appreciating catagory… that surprises me because homes for sale, at least in south UC, seem to stay on the market for quite a while. During the peak it seemed like the $1Million price tag was not unusual – and now most listings are in a more realistic range.
I’m glad I’m not selling or buying in this market.
January 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM #331656UCGalParticipantThat article is surprising… I clicked on the graphic to see that UC is in the appreciating catagory… that surprises me because homes for sale, at least in south UC, seem to stay on the market for quite a while. During the peak it seemed like the $1Million price tag was not unusual – and now most listings are in a more realistic range.
I’m glad I’m not selling or buying in this market.
January 20, 2009 at 11:59 AM #332231hugoParticipantUsing all of 2008 is a little misleading. Also, the places where the price is holding up also show a decrease in sales.
January 20, 2009 at 11:59 AM #332147hugoParticipantUsing all of 2008 is a little misleading. Also, the places where the price is holding up also show a decrease in sales.
January 20, 2009 at 11:59 AM #332120hugoParticipantUsing all of 2008 is a little misleading. Also, the places where the price is holding up also show a decrease in sales.
January 20, 2009 at 11:59 AM #331706hugoParticipantUsing all of 2008 is a little misleading. Also, the places where the price is holding up also show a decrease in sales.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.