- This topic has 80 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by jeeman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 31, 2009 at 12:16 AM #16857December 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM #498126CA renterParticipant
IMHO, 2001 was the peak of the “normal” RE cycle, and marked the beginning of the hyperbolic move in the credit markets (credit bubble).
That being said, if you can get a house in one of the better areas at a 2002 price, your risk is already largely reduced as far as the really big losses are concerned, IMHO. We do have to consider the future of the dollar, so buying a house at that price level might not be the worst thing you can do.
December 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM #498763CA renterParticipantIMHO, 2001 was the peak of the “normal” RE cycle, and marked the beginning of the hyperbolic move in the credit markets (credit bubble).
That being said, if you can get a house in one of the better areas at a 2002 price, your risk is already largely reduced as far as the really big losses are concerned, IMHO. We do have to consider the future of the dollar, so buying a house at that price level might not be the worst thing you can do.
December 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM #498279CA renterParticipantIMHO, 2001 was the peak of the “normal” RE cycle, and marked the beginning of the hyperbolic move in the credit markets (credit bubble).
That being said, if you can get a house in one of the better areas at a 2002 price, your risk is already largely reduced as far as the really big losses are concerned, IMHO. We do have to consider the future of the dollar, so buying a house at that price level might not be the worst thing you can do.
December 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM #498671CA renterParticipantIMHO, 2001 was the peak of the “normal” RE cycle, and marked the beginning of the hyperbolic move in the credit markets (credit bubble).
That being said, if you can get a house in one of the better areas at a 2002 price, your risk is already largely reduced as far as the really big losses are concerned, IMHO. We do have to consider the future of the dollar, so buying a house at that price level might not be the worst thing you can do.
December 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM #499010CA renterParticipantIMHO, 2001 was the peak of the “normal” RE cycle, and marked the beginning of the hyperbolic move in the credit markets (credit bubble).
That being said, if you can get a house in one of the better areas at a 2002 price, your risk is already largely reduced as far as the really big losses are concerned, IMHO. We do have to consider the future of the dollar, so buying a house at that price level might not be the worst thing you can do.
December 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM #498136SD RealtorParticipantWithin high end there is alot of play and I still think high end has a ways to go depending on the area. With that said, I would agree with you CAR, at that level you have still bled alot of risk out.
December 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM #498681SD RealtorParticipantWithin high end there is alot of play and I still think high end has a ways to go depending on the area. With that said, I would agree with you CAR, at that level you have still bled alot of risk out.
December 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM #498289SD RealtorParticipantWithin high end there is alot of play and I still think high end has a ways to go depending on the area. With that said, I would agree with you CAR, at that level you have still bled alot of risk out.
December 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM #498773SD RealtorParticipantWithin high end there is alot of play and I still think high end has a ways to go depending on the area. With that said, I would agree with you CAR, at that level you have still bled alot of risk out.
December 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM #499020SD RealtorParticipantWithin high end there is alot of play and I still think high end has a ways to go depending on the area. With that said, I would agree with you CAR, at that level you have still bled alot of risk out.
December 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM #498696EugeneParticipantIt would be a decent price level, but I don’t know any high-end areas where it’s also a realistic price level.
December 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM #498788EugeneParticipantIt would be a decent price level, but I don’t know any high-end areas where it’s also a realistic price level.
December 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM #499035EugeneParticipantIt would be a decent price level, but I don’t know any high-end areas where it’s also a realistic price level.
December 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM #498304EugeneParticipantIt would be a decent price level, but I don’t know any high-end areas where it’s also a realistic price level.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.