- This topic has 80 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
jeeman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM #498151December 31, 2009 at 10:23 AM #499050
sdrealtor
ParticipantIts impossible to say without knowing specifics. Here is an example. The house next to me sold in 2001 at a price it could never see again. Not that my current neighbor would ever move but I dont think it will see within $100K of what it sold for which is about 20% more than 2001 price. If it went on the market today there would be a bidding war to pay $250K more than the 2001 price. That 2001 price was representative of the about $50K above the 1998 purchase price plus improvements to make it liveable (i.e. paint, flooring, applainces, landscaping etc.). In 2001 it was still relatively cheap. Add to that 10 yrs of minimal inflation (2%) and you are up to early 2003 pricing without a problem which I feel is the bottom for that property. The year of huge appreciation was early 2003 to early 2004. If you are getting a great property in a great area at 2002 pricing you are more than likely in a very good position. Of course, if I know more specifics my opinion might change but generalizations are the best we can do with what you’ve given me. If you want to PM details I’d be happy to be more specific.
December 31, 2009 at 10:23 AM #498803sdrealtor
ParticipantIts impossible to say without knowing specifics. Here is an example. The house next to me sold in 2001 at a price it could never see again. Not that my current neighbor would ever move but I dont think it will see within $100K of what it sold for which is about 20% more than 2001 price. If it went on the market today there would be a bidding war to pay $250K more than the 2001 price. That 2001 price was representative of the about $50K above the 1998 purchase price plus improvements to make it liveable (i.e. paint, flooring, applainces, landscaping etc.). In 2001 it was still relatively cheap. Add to that 10 yrs of minimal inflation (2%) and you are up to early 2003 pricing without a problem which I feel is the bottom for that property. The year of huge appreciation was early 2003 to early 2004. If you are getting a great property in a great area at 2002 pricing you are more than likely in a very good position. Of course, if I know more specifics my opinion might change but generalizations are the best we can do with what you’ve given me. If you want to PM details I’d be happy to be more specific.
December 31, 2009 at 10:23 AM #498319sdrealtor
ParticipantIts impossible to say without knowing specifics. Here is an example. The house next to me sold in 2001 at a price it could never see again. Not that my current neighbor would ever move but I dont think it will see within $100K of what it sold for which is about 20% more than 2001 price. If it went on the market today there would be a bidding war to pay $250K more than the 2001 price. That 2001 price was representative of the about $50K above the 1998 purchase price plus improvements to make it liveable (i.e. paint, flooring, applainces, landscaping etc.). In 2001 it was still relatively cheap. Add to that 10 yrs of minimal inflation (2%) and you are up to early 2003 pricing without a problem which I feel is the bottom for that property. The year of huge appreciation was early 2003 to early 2004. If you are getting a great property in a great area at 2002 pricing you are more than likely in a very good position. Of course, if I know more specifics my opinion might change but generalizations are the best we can do with what you’ve given me. If you want to PM details I’d be happy to be more specific.
December 31, 2009 at 10:23 AM #498166sdrealtor
ParticipantIts impossible to say without knowing specifics. Here is an example. The house next to me sold in 2001 at a price it could never see again. Not that my current neighbor would ever move but I dont think it will see within $100K of what it sold for which is about 20% more than 2001 price. If it went on the market today there would be a bidding war to pay $250K more than the 2001 price. That 2001 price was representative of the about $50K above the 1998 purchase price plus improvements to make it liveable (i.e. paint, flooring, applainces, landscaping etc.). In 2001 it was still relatively cheap. Add to that 10 yrs of minimal inflation (2%) and you are up to early 2003 pricing without a problem which I feel is the bottom for that property. The year of huge appreciation was early 2003 to early 2004. If you are getting a great property in a great area at 2002 pricing you are more than likely in a very good position. Of course, if I know more specifics my opinion might change but generalizations are the best we can do with what you’ve given me. If you want to PM details I’d be happy to be more specific.
December 31, 2009 at 10:23 AM #498711sdrealtor
ParticipantIts impossible to say without knowing specifics. Here is an example. The house next to me sold in 2001 at a price it could never see again. Not that my current neighbor would ever move but I dont think it will see within $100K of what it sold for which is about 20% more than 2001 price. If it went on the market today there would be a bidding war to pay $250K more than the 2001 price. That 2001 price was representative of the about $50K above the 1998 purchase price plus improvements to make it liveable (i.e. paint, flooring, applainces, landscaping etc.). In 2001 it was still relatively cheap. Add to that 10 yrs of minimal inflation (2%) and you are up to early 2003 pricing without a problem which I feel is the bottom for that property. The year of huge appreciation was early 2003 to early 2004. If you are getting a great property in a great area at 2002 pricing you are more than likely in a very good position. Of course, if I know more specifics my opinion might change but generalizations are the best we can do with what you’ve given me. If you want to PM details I’d be happy to be more specific.
January 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM #498469poorgradstudent
ParticipantYeah, at least a specific zip code or neighborhood might help people make a more informed recommendation 🙂
January 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM #499199poorgradstudent
ParticipantYeah, at least a specific zip code or neighborhood might help people make a more informed recommendation 🙂
January 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM #498954poorgradstudent
ParticipantYeah, at least a specific zip code or neighborhood might help people make a more informed recommendation 🙂
January 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM #498861poorgradstudent
ParticipantYeah, at least a specific zip code or neighborhood might help people make a more informed recommendation 🙂
January 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM #498318poorgradstudent
ParticipantYeah, at least a specific zip code or neighborhood might help people make a more informed recommendation 🙂
January 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM #498959patb
Participantdepends where you are.
San Diego will become a popular area once the bad mortgages are cleared out. The trick is buying at the CS-100 index. then it’s probably stable.
now that doesn’t apply to someplace declining, like Detroit, which is headed to the 1962 price level.
January 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM #499204patb
Participantdepends where you are.
San Diego will become a popular area once the bad mortgages are cleared out. The trick is buying at the CS-100 index. then it’s probably stable.
now that doesn’t apply to someplace declining, like Detroit, which is headed to the 1962 price level.
January 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM #498866patb
Participantdepends where you are.
San Diego will become a popular area once the bad mortgages are cleared out. The trick is buying at the CS-100 index. then it’s probably stable.
now that doesn’t apply to someplace declining, like Detroit, which is headed to the 1962 price level.
January 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM #498474patb
Participantdepends where you are.
San Diego will become a popular area once the bad mortgages are cleared out. The trick is buying at the CS-100 index. then it’s probably stable.
now that doesn’t apply to someplace declining, like Detroit, which is headed to the 1962 price level.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.