- This topic has 140 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 16, 2008 at 8:01 AM #136993January 16, 2008 at 8:13 AM #136701
nostradamus
ParticipantGood graphs. They show that there was a clear period at the end of the last downturn when it was cheaper to own than to rent.
January 16, 2008 at 8:13 AM #136898nostradamus
ParticipantGood graphs. They show that there was a clear period at the end of the last downturn when it was cheaper to own than to rent.
January 16, 2008 at 8:13 AM #136932nostradamus
ParticipantGood graphs. They show that there was a clear period at the end of the last downturn when it was cheaper to own than to rent.
January 16, 2008 at 8:13 AM #136960nostradamus
ParticipantGood graphs. They show that there was a clear period at the end of the last downturn when it was cheaper to own than to rent.
January 16, 2008 at 8:13 AM #136998nostradamus
ParticipantGood graphs. They show that there was a clear period at the end of the last downturn when it was cheaper to own than to rent.
January 16, 2008 at 8:16 AM #136706I would rather be lucky then smart
Participantthank you all.
January 16, 2008 at 8:16 AM #136902I would rather be lucky then smart
Participantthank you all.
January 16, 2008 at 8:16 AM #136937I would rather be lucky then smart
Participantthank you all.
January 16, 2008 at 8:16 AM #136965I would rather be lucky then smart
Participantthank you all.
January 16, 2008 at 8:16 AM #137004I would rather be lucky then smart
Participantthank you all.
January 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM #136820sdduuuude
ParticipantI think it’s a good question, and the basic answer, as others point out, are rent/price ratios, price/income ratios, and payment/income ratios. Look at all of them.
When looking at payment/income – don’t compare the payment on a 20% down fixed loan in 2001 to the payment on a zero-down adjustable loan in 2005. Compare apples-to-apples in different years to see how the fundamentals ceased to support the price.
We always have and always will pay a premium for weather here. It is an underlying fundamental to support higher prices in So Cal than in other parts of the country.
However, as Rich pointed out many, many times, the weather didn’t suddenly improve here between 2000 and 2004. Thus, the premium had no fundamental reason to increase as it did.
Weather was simply fuel to the speculative ferver.
January 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM #137019sdduuuude
ParticipantI think it’s a good question, and the basic answer, as others point out, are rent/price ratios, price/income ratios, and payment/income ratios. Look at all of them.
When looking at payment/income – don’t compare the payment on a 20% down fixed loan in 2001 to the payment on a zero-down adjustable loan in 2005. Compare apples-to-apples in different years to see how the fundamentals ceased to support the price.
We always have and always will pay a premium for weather here. It is an underlying fundamental to support higher prices in So Cal than in other parts of the country.
However, as Rich pointed out many, many times, the weather didn’t suddenly improve here between 2000 and 2004. Thus, the premium had no fundamental reason to increase as it did.
Weather was simply fuel to the speculative ferver.
January 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM #137052sdduuuude
ParticipantI think it’s a good question, and the basic answer, as others point out, are rent/price ratios, price/income ratios, and payment/income ratios. Look at all of them.
When looking at payment/income – don’t compare the payment on a 20% down fixed loan in 2001 to the payment on a zero-down adjustable loan in 2005. Compare apples-to-apples in different years to see how the fundamentals ceased to support the price.
We always have and always will pay a premium for weather here. It is an underlying fundamental to support higher prices in So Cal than in other parts of the country.
However, as Rich pointed out many, many times, the weather didn’t suddenly improve here between 2000 and 2004. Thus, the premium had no fundamental reason to increase as it did.
Weather was simply fuel to the speculative ferver.
January 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM #137079sdduuuude
ParticipantI think it’s a good question, and the basic answer, as others point out, are rent/price ratios, price/income ratios, and payment/income ratios. Look at all of them.
When looking at payment/income – don’t compare the payment on a 20% down fixed loan in 2001 to the payment on a zero-down adjustable loan in 2005. Compare apples-to-apples in different years to see how the fundamentals ceased to support the price.
We always have and always will pay a premium for weather here. It is an underlying fundamental to support higher prices in So Cal than in other parts of the country.
However, as Rich pointed out many, many times, the weather didn’t suddenly improve here between 2000 and 2004. Thus, the premium had no fundamental reason to increase as it did.
Weather was simply fuel to the speculative ferver.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.