Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › We screwed up. So, what should we have done?
- This topic has 125 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 26, 2008 at 9:12 PM #309869November 26, 2008 at 9:20 PM #309404
patientrenter
Participantkewp,
I agree that population increase can support good living standards for a generation of people who didn’t save but want to retire in comfort anyway. It can continue for a very long time, maybe for several generations.
Do you see that as a sustainable solution forever? If not, is it better to deal with the solution with a lower population now, or leave a much larger problem to our descendants? (I am biased in favor of lower populations, but maybe other Piggs have a more sanguine point of view.)
FLU, I am beginning to think that baby boomers’ desire for a ‘free lunch’ retirement is at the root of the recent problems, so I don’t blame your generation at all. But I am curious what others think.
November 26, 2008 at 9:20 PM #309768patientrenter
Participantkewp,
I agree that population increase can support good living standards for a generation of people who didn’t save but want to retire in comfort anyway. It can continue for a very long time, maybe for several generations.
Do you see that as a sustainable solution forever? If not, is it better to deal with the solution with a lower population now, or leave a much larger problem to our descendants? (I am biased in favor of lower populations, but maybe other Piggs have a more sanguine point of view.)
FLU, I am beginning to think that baby boomers’ desire for a ‘free lunch’ retirement is at the root of the recent problems, so I don’t blame your generation at all. But I am curious what others think.
November 26, 2008 at 9:20 PM #309792patientrenter
Participantkewp,
I agree that population increase can support good living standards for a generation of people who didn’t save but want to retire in comfort anyway. It can continue for a very long time, maybe for several generations.
Do you see that as a sustainable solution forever? If not, is it better to deal with the solution with a lower population now, or leave a much larger problem to our descendants? (I am biased in favor of lower populations, but maybe other Piggs have a more sanguine point of view.)
FLU, I am beginning to think that baby boomers’ desire for a ‘free lunch’ retirement is at the root of the recent problems, so I don’t blame your generation at all. But I am curious what others think.
November 26, 2008 at 9:20 PM #309812patientrenter
Participantkewp,
I agree that population increase can support good living standards for a generation of people who didn’t save but want to retire in comfort anyway. It can continue for a very long time, maybe for several generations.
Do you see that as a sustainable solution forever? If not, is it better to deal with the solution with a lower population now, or leave a much larger problem to our descendants? (I am biased in favor of lower populations, but maybe other Piggs have a more sanguine point of view.)
FLU, I am beginning to think that baby boomers’ desire for a ‘free lunch’ retirement is at the root of the recent problems, so I don’t blame your generation at all. But I am curious what others think.
November 26, 2008 at 9:20 PM #309874patientrenter
Participantkewp,
I agree that population increase can support good living standards for a generation of people who didn’t save but want to retire in comfort anyway. It can continue for a very long time, maybe for several generations.
Do you see that as a sustainable solution forever? If not, is it better to deal with the solution with a lower population now, or leave a much larger problem to our descendants? (I am biased in favor of lower populations, but maybe other Piggs have a more sanguine point of view.)
FLU, I am beginning to think that baby boomers’ desire for a ‘free lunch’ retirement is at the root of the recent problems, so I don’t blame your generation at all. But I am curious what others think.
November 26, 2008 at 9:54 PM #309425kewp
ParticipantPatientrenter,
I see most of our problems solvable via technology and progressive solutions. It just requires a liberal, forward-thinking mindset.
Oh, and taxing the f*ck out of the elite.
November 26, 2008 at 9:54 PM #309788kewp
ParticipantPatientrenter,
I see most of our problems solvable via technology and progressive solutions. It just requires a liberal, forward-thinking mindset.
Oh, and taxing the f*ck out of the elite.
November 26, 2008 at 9:54 PM #309811kewp
ParticipantPatientrenter,
I see most of our problems solvable via technology and progressive solutions. It just requires a liberal, forward-thinking mindset.
Oh, and taxing the f*ck out of the elite.
November 26, 2008 at 9:54 PM #309832kewp
ParticipantPatientrenter,
I see most of our problems solvable via technology and progressive solutions. It just requires a liberal, forward-thinking mindset.
Oh, and taxing the f*ck out of the elite.
November 26, 2008 at 9:54 PM #309895kewp
ParticipantPatientrenter,
I see most of our problems solvable via technology and progressive solutions. It just requires a liberal, forward-thinking mindset.
Oh, and taxing the f*ck out of the elite.
November 27, 2008 at 7:25 AM #309449meadandale
Participant[quote=kewp]I posted this in another thread. Basically, just open up the borders. This would also help rescue the various entitlement programs (at least until the immigrants get old).
[/quote]Adding another layer or two doesn’t change the inevitable–it just delays the day of reckoning…a pyramid scheme is still a pyramid scheme.
November 27, 2008 at 7:25 AM #309813meadandale
Participant[quote=kewp]I posted this in another thread. Basically, just open up the borders. This would also help rescue the various entitlement programs (at least until the immigrants get old).
[/quote]Adding another layer or two doesn’t change the inevitable–it just delays the day of reckoning…a pyramid scheme is still a pyramid scheme.
November 27, 2008 at 7:25 AM #309836meadandale
Participant[quote=kewp]I posted this in another thread. Basically, just open up the borders. This would also help rescue the various entitlement programs (at least until the immigrants get old).
[/quote]Adding another layer or two doesn’t change the inevitable–it just delays the day of reckoning…a pyramid scheme is still a pyramid scheme.
November 27, 2008 at 7:25 AM #309857meadandale
Participant[quote=kewp]I posted this in another thread. Basically, just open up the borders. This would also help rescue the various entitlement programs (at least until the immigrants get old).
[/quote]Adding another layer or two doesn’t change the inevitable–it just delays the day of reckoning…a pyramid scheme is still a pyramid scheme.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
