- This topic has 485 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
JWM in SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM #161374February 27, 2008 at 1:39 PM #160982
sdduuuude
ParticipantJWM – not sure what you are saying here. I am in some sort of denial?
Also, Schiller said ” we can buy more housing ”
But – do we really need more housing ?February 27, 2008 at 1:39 PM #161278sdduuuude
ParticipantJWM – not sure what you are saying here. I am in some sort of denial?
Also, Schiller said ” we can buy more housing ”
But – do we really need more housing ?February 27, 2008 at 1:39 PM #161292sdduuuude
ParticipantJWM – not sure what you are saying here. I am in some sort of denial?
Also, Schiller said ” we can buy more housing ”
But – do we really need more housing ?February 27, 2008 at 1:39 PM #161310sdduuuude
ParticipantJWM – not sure what you are saying here. I am in some sort of denial?
Also, Schiller said ” we can buy more housing ”
But – do we really need more housing ?February 27, 2008 at 1:39 PM #161378sdduuuude
ParticipantJWM – not sure what you are saying here. I am in some sort of denial?
Also, Schiller said ” we can buy more housing ”
But – do we really need more housing ?February 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM #160987felix
ParticipantJwm, indeed it is not 2006. It is 2008 and we are now closer to the bottom than we were in ’06. So whatever you refuted then doesn’t necessarily still ring true. Rates have been reduced dramatically and home pricing has already moderated dramatically.
yes, some home debtors will be out of their homes. It will be those who overextended themselves. The vast majority who have not overextended themselves or used their home as a bank will not be dragged down regardless of whether the Fed monetizes the mortgages or not.
February 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM #161283felix
ParticipantJwm, indeed it is not 2006. It is 2008 and we are now closer to the bottom than we were in ’06. So whatever you refuted then doesn’t necessarily still ring true. Rates have been reduced dramatically and home pricing has already moderated dramatically.
yes, some home debtors will be out of their homes. It will be those who overextended themselves. The vast majority who have not overextended themselves or used their home as a bank will not be dragged down regardless of whether the Fed monetizes the mortgages or not.
February 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM #161296felix
ParticipantJwm, indeed it is not 2006. It is 2008 and we are now closer to the bottom than we were in ’06. So whatever you refuted then doesn’t necessarily still ring true. Rates have been reduced dramatically and home pricing has already moderated dramatically.
yes, some home debtors will be out of their homes. It will be those who overextended themselves. The vast majority who have not overextended themselves or used their home as a bank will not be dragged down regardless of whether the Fed monetizes the mortgages or not.
February 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM #161315felix
ParticipantJwm, indeed it is not 2006. It is 2008 and we are now closer to the bottom than we were in ’06. So whatever you refuted then doesn’t necessarily still ring true. Rates have been reduced dramatically and home pricing has already moderated dramatically.
yes, some home debtors will be out of their homes. It will be those who overextended themselves. The vast majority who have not overextended themselves or used their home as a bank will not be dragged down regardless of whether the Fed monetizes the mortgages or not.
February 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM #161383felix
ParticipantJwm, indeed it is not 2006. It is 2008 and we are now closer to the bottom than we were in ’06. So whatever you refuted then doesn’t necessarily still ring true. Rates have been reduced dramatically and home pricing has already moderated dramatically.
yes, some home debtors will be out of their homes. It will be those who overextended themselves. The vast majority who have not overextended themselves or used their home as a bank will not be dragged down regardless of whether the Fed monetizes the mortgages or not.
February 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM #161016patientlywaiting
ParticipantJWM, I love your terse comments. Others many not get it, but I do. π
Felix, yeah, overnight, all the inventory of foreclosures, short-sales, distress sales will be all gone. Poof!! Don’t wait another day! Buy now before you miss out!!
I believe that Shiller said that we are richer, as a society, when housing prices drop. He’s looking at it from a macro perspective. The wealth of nations is based on the standard of living of the citizens. If you own and live in an old decrepit apartment in New York or Moscow with bad heat, you might have paper wealth, but your standard of living is low. That’s the context in which “rich” needs to be understood.
February 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM #161313patientlywaiting
ParticipantJWM, I love your terse comments. Others many not get it, but I do. π
Felix, yeah, overnight, all the inventory of foreclosures, short-sales, distress sales will be all gone. Poof!! Don’t wait another day! Buy now before you miss out!!
I believe that Shiller said that we are richer, as a society, when housing prices drop. He’s looking at it from a macro perspective. The wealth of nations is based on the standard of living of the citizens. If you own and live in an old decrepit apartment in New York or Moscow with bad heat, you might have paper wealth, but your standard of living is low. That’s the context in which “rich” needs to be understood.
February 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM #161327patientlywaiting
ParticipantJWM, I love your terse comments. Others many not get it, but I do. π
Felix, yeah, overnight, all the inventory of foreclosures, short-sales, distress sales will be all gone. Poof!! Don’t wait another day! Buy now before you miss out!!
I believe that Shiller said that we are richer, as a society, when housing prices drop. He’s looking at it from a macro perspective. The wealth of nations is based on the standard of living of the citizens. If you own and live in an old decrepit apartment in New York or Moscow with bad heat, you might have paper wealth, but your standard of living is low. That’s the context in which “rich” needs to be understood.
February 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM #161345patientlywaiting
ParticipantJWM, I love your terse comments. Others many not get it, but I do. π
Felix, yeah, overnight, all the inventory of foreclosures, short-sales, distress sales will be all gone. Poof!! Don’t wait another day! Buy now before you miss out!!
I believe that Shiller said that we are richer, as a society, when housing prices drop. He’s looking at it from a macro perspective. The wealth of nations is based on the standard of living of the citizens. If you own and live in an old decrepit apartment in New York or Moscow with bad heat, you might have paper wealth, but your standard of living is low. That’s the context in which “rich” needs to be understood.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.