Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Visual Inflation/Deflation For Dummies
- This topic has 155 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2010 at 7:53 AM #603590September 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM #602559UCGalParticipant
[quote=ocrenter]very good, please link up again when the deflation chart is available.[/quote]
The bottom of the chart addresses deflation.September 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM #602648UCGalParticipant[quote=ocrenter]very good, please link up again when the deflation chart is available.[/quote]
The bottom of the chart addresses deflation.September 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM #603196UCGalParticipant[quote=ocrenter]very good, please link up again when the deflation chart is available.[/quote]
The bottom of the chart addresses deflation.September 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM #603302UCGalParticipant[quote=ocrenter]very good, please link up again when the deflation chart is available.[/quote]
The bottom of the chart addresses deflation.September 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM #603620UCGalParticipant[quote=ocrenter]very good, please link up again when the deflation chart is available.[/quote]
The bottom of the chart addresses deflation.September 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM #603054citydwellerParticipantSo does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?
September 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM #603143citydwellerParticipantSo does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?
September 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM #603691citydwellerParticipantSo does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?
September 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM #603798citydwellerParticipantSo does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?
September 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM #604115citydwellerParticipantSo does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?
September 9, 2010 at 7:38 PM #603074Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=citydweller]So does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?[/quote]
“A” stimulus, maybe, but “The” stimulus? (The one that mostly bailed out financial companies?) No… good writeup here:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/08/bailout-counter-factual/
Also: I believe that the whole “consumers will put off purchases if prices are dropping” thing is way overblown, in this tutorial and elsewhere. People might put something off for a little while, but that would only last for so long because A) life goes on and B) people would eventually want to capitalize on the good deals. Look at the computer industry as evidence, prices are constantly dropping there and yet people somehow buy computers.
The more harmful aspect of deflation, in our society, is that if the society is highly indebted then deflation causes the real burden of the debt to rise.
September 9, 2010 at 7:38 PM #603163Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=citydweller]So does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?[/quote]
“A” stimulus, maybe, but “The” stimulus? (The one that mostly bailed out financial companies?) No… good writeup here:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/08/bailout-counter-factual/
Also: I believe that the whole “consumers will put off purchases if prices are dropping” thing is way overblown, in this tutorial and elsewhere. People might put something off for a little while, but that would only last for so long because A) life goes on and B) people would eventually want to capitalize on the good deals. Look at the computer industry as evidence, prices are constantly dropping there and yet people somehow buy computers.
The more harmful aspect of deflation, in our society, is that if the society is highly indebted then deflation causes the real burden of the debt to rise.
September 9, 2010 at 7:38 PM #603711Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=citydweller]So does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?[/quote]
“A” stimulus, maybe, but “The” stimulus? (The one that mostly bailed out financial companies?) No… good writeup here:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/08/bailout-counter-factual/
Also: I believe that the whole “consumers will put off purchases if prices are dropping” thing is way overblown, in this tutorial and elsewhere. People might put something off for a little while, but that would only last for so long because A) life goes on and B) people would eventually want to capitalize on the good deals. Look at the computer industry as evidence, prices are constantly dropping there and yet people somehow buy computers.
The more harmful aspect of deflation, in our society, is that if the society is highly indebted then deflation causes the real burden of the debt to rise.
September 9, 2010 at 7:38 PM #603818Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=citydweller]So does this mean the stimulus really was necessary to avoid a downward, deflationary spiral?[/quote]
“A” stimulus, maybe, but “The” stimulus? (The one that mostly bailed out financial companies?) No… good writeup here:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/08/bailout-counter-factual/
Also: I believe that the whole “consumers will put off purchases if prices are dropping” thing is way overblown, in this tutorial and elsewhere. People might put something off for a little while, but that would only last for so long because A) life goes on and B) people would eventually want to capitalize on the good deals. Look at the computer industry as evidence, prices are constantly dropping there and yet people somehow buy computers.
The more harmful aspect of deflation, in our society, is that if the society is highly indebted then deflation causes the real burden of the debt to rise.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.