- This topic has 715 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
ra633.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 17, 2009 at 7:18 PM #348972February 17, 2009 at 7:26 PM #348417
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=ibjames]I’m sorry for being a little vulgar, but you have the balls to come back, and try to justify this after we sat, post after post, with SOLID data, and he bought anyway, and many here told him this day would come too..
You can lead a horse to water.. [/quote]
Wasn’t this joker here like just a year ago asking for advice which he totally ignored? I can’t believe this is the type of dildo our taxpayer dollars are bailing out. I wish the main-stream media would do a profile on this guy so all the J6Ps could see the type of jackass that they are paying for with their taxpayer-bailout dollars. Unbelievable.
February 17, 2009 at 7:26 PM #348734Participant[quote=ibjames]I’m sorry for being a little vulgar, but you have the balls to come back, and try to justify this after we sat, post after post, with SOLID data, and he bought anyway, and many here told him this day would come too..
You can lead a horse to water.. [/quote]
Wasn’t this joker here like just a year ago asking for advice which he totally ignored? I can’t believe this is the type of dildo our taxpayer dollars are bailing out. I wish the main-stream media would do a profile on this guy so all the J6Ps could see the type of jackass that they are paying for with their taxpayer-bailout dollars. Unbelievable.
February 17, 2009 at 7:26 PM #348853Participant[quote=ibjames]I’m sorry for being a little vulgar, but you have the balls to come back, and try to justify this after we sat, post after post, with SOLID data, and he bought anyway, and many here told him this day would come too..
You can lead a horse to water.. [/quote]
Wasn’t this joker here like just a year ago asking for advice which he totally ignored? I can’t believe this is the type of dildo our taxpayer dollars are bailing out. I wish the main-stream media would do a profile on this guy so all the J6Ps could see the type of jackass that they are paying for with their taxpayer-bailout dollars. Unbelievable.
February 17, 2009 at 7:26 PM #348885Participant[quote=ibjames]I’m sorry for being a little vulgar, but you have the balls to come back, and try to justify this after we sat, post after post, with SOLID data, and he bought anyway, and many here told him this day would come too..
You can lead a horse to water.. [/quote]
Wasn’t this joker here like just a year ago asking for advice which he totally ignored? I can’t believe this is the type of dildo our taxpayer dollars are bailing out. I wish the main-stream media would do a profile on this guy so all the J6Ps could see the type of jackass that they are paying for with their taxpayer-bailout dollars. Unbelievable.
February 17, 2009 at 7:26 PM #348987Participant[quote=ibjames]I’m sorry for being a little vulgar, but you have the balls to come back, and try to justify this after we sat, post after post, with SOLID data, and he bought anyway, and many here told him this day would come too..
You can lead a horse to water.. [/quote]
Wasn’t this joker here like just a year ago asking for advice which he totally ignored? I can’t believe this is the type of dildo our taxpayer dollars are bailing out. I wish the main-stream media would do a profile on this guy so all the J6Ps could see the type of jackass that they are paying for with their taxpayer-bailout dollars. Unbelievable.
February 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM #348432Participant[quote=North County Jim]
These are called business decisions and they are made every day.[/quote]
Calling this a business decision is a ridiculous characterization. This would be a business decision if it involved two private parties who were only risking their own money.
Instead, what we have here is two parties playing with other people’s money. You have the banker on one side who is playing with depositor’s money backed up by taxpayer dollars. His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.
Characterizing this type of transaction as a ‘business’ decision is absurd. It’s two jokers playing with other people’s money. Socialism to the core.
February 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM #348749Participant[quote=North County Jim]
These are called business decisions and they are made every day.[/quote]
Calling this a business decision is a ridiculous characterization. This would be a business decision if it involved two private parties who were only risking their own money.
Instead, what we have here is two parties playing with other people’s money. You have the banker on one side who is playing with depositor’s money backed up by taxpayer dollars. His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.
Characterizing this type of transaction as a ‘business’ decision is absurd. It’s two jokers playing with other people’s money. Socialism to the core.
February 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM #348868Participant[quote=North County Jim]
These are called business decisions and they are made every day.[/quote]
Calling this a business decision is a ridiculous characterization. This would be a business decision if it involved two private parties who were only risking their own money.
Instead, what we have here is two parties playing with other people’s money. You have the banker on one side who is playing with depositor’s money backed up by taxpayer dollars. His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.
Characterizing this type of transaction as a ‘business’ decision is absurd. It’s two jokers playing with other people’s money. Socialism to the core.
February 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM #348900Participant[quote=North County Jim]
These are called business decisions and they are made every day.[/quote]
Calling this a business decision is a ridiculous characterization. This would be a business decision if it involved two private parties who were only risking their own money.
Instead, what we have here is two parties playing with other people’s money. You have the banker on one side who is playing with depositor’s money backed up by taxpayer dollars. His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.
Characterizing this type of transaction as a ‘business’ decision is absurd. It’s two jokers playing with other people’s money. Socialism to the core.
February 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM #349002Participant[quote=North County Jim]
These are called business decisions and they are made every day.[/quote]
Calling this a business decision is a ridiculous characterization. This would be a business decision if it involved two private parties who were only risking their own money.
Instead, what we have here is two parties playing with other people’s money. You have the banker on one side who is playing with depositor’s money backed up by taxpayer dollars. His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.
Characterizing this type of transaction as a ‘business’ decision is absurd. It’s two jokers playing with other people’s money. Socialism to the core.
February 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #348472North County Jim
Participant[quote]His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.[/quote]
You’re describing water that went under the bridge years ago.
Yes, I wouldn’t quibble with calling loans during the insanity of years past “two jokers playing with other people’s money”.
All that being said, if you were one of those “jokers” today, what would you do? I don’t know about you but I would try to think ahead rather than cast blame at what happened in the past.
If I felt the climate was right to modify my loan, I would be all over it in a nanosecond. I would gladly take the credit score hit for a chance to significantly improve my balance sheet.
That is a business decision.
February 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #348789Participant[quote]His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.[/quote]
You’re describing water that went under the bridge years ago.
Yes, I wouldn’t quibble with calling loans during the insanity of years past “two jokers playing with other people’s money”.
All that being said, if you were one of those “jokers” today, what would you do? I don’t know about you but I would try to think ahead rather than cast blame at what happened in the past.
If I felt the climate was right to modify my loan, I would be all over it in a nanosecond. I would gladly take the credit score hit for a chance to significantly improve my balance sheet.
That is a business decision.
February 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #348908Participant[quote]His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.[/quote]
You’re describing water that went under the bridge years ago.
Yes, I wouldn’t quibble with calling loans during the insanity of years past “two jokers playing with other people’s money”.
All that being said, if you were one of those “jokers” today, what would you do? I don’t know about you but I would try to think ahead rather than cast blame at what happened in the past.
If I felt the climate was right to modify my loan, I would be all over it in a nanosecond. I would gladly take the credit score hit for a chance to significantly improve my balance sheet.
That is a business decision.
February 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #348941Participant[quote]His main goal was to make as much short-term profit for himself as possible by shafting depositors/taxpayers. On the other side of the deal you have some clueless moron house buyer who is just looking for as low of an initial payment as he can get along with a low-to-minimal down payment.[/quote]
You’re describing water that went under the bridge years ago.
Yes, I wouldn’t quibble with calling loans during the insanity of years past “two jokers playing with other people’s money”.
All that being said, if you were one of those “jokers” today, what would you do? I don’t know about you but I would try to think ahead rather than cast blame at what happened in the past.
If I felt the climate was right to modify my loan, I would be all over it in a nanosecond. I would gladly take the credit score hit for a chance to significantly improve my balance sheet.
That is a business decision.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.