- This topic has 160 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 23, 2010 at 11:48 PM #571336June 23, 2010 at 11:56 PM #570351Diego MamaniParticipant
[quote]It’s unknown if the Lexus crossed the line, the BMW crossed the line, or both…[/quote]
I’m no expert, but it looks like the Lexus invaded the BMW’s lane. You can see the BMW’s tire marks as its driver hit the brakes when he saw the Lexus coming towards him.
June 23, 2010 at 11:56 PM #570445Diego MamaniParticipant[quote]It’s unknown if the Lexus crossed the line, the BMW crossed the line, or both…[/quote]
I’m no expert, but it looks like the Lexus invaded the BMW’s lane. You can see the BMW’s tire marks as its driver hit the brakes when he saw the Lexus coming towards him.
June 23, 2010 at 11:56 PM #570954Diego MamaniParticipant[quote]It’s unknown if the Lexus crossed the line, the BMW crossed the line, or both…[/quote]
I’m no expert, but it looks like the Lexus invaded the BMW’s lane. You can see the BMW’s tire marks as its driver hit the brakes when he saw the Lexus coming towards him.
June 23, 2010 at 11:56 PM #571061Diego MamaniParticipant[quote]It’s unknown if the Lexus crossed the line, the BMW crossed the line, or both…[/quote]
I’m no expert, but it looks like the Lexus invaded the BMW’s lane. You can see the BMW’s tire marks as its driver hit the brakes when he saw the Lexus coming towards him.
June 23, 2010 at 11:56 PM #571351Diego MamaniParticipant[quote]It’s unknown if the Lexus crossed the line, the BMW crossed the line, or both…[/quote]
I’m no expert, but it looks like the Lexus invaded the BMW’s lane. You can see the BMW’s tire marks as its driver hit the brakes when he saw the Lexus coming towards him.
June 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM #570366CoronitaParticipant[quote=svelte]My heart goes out to his family.
[quote=flu][quote=jpinpb]It says something for the BMW safety. [/quote]
…the car car was lower to the ground and probably suffered the brunt of of the damage… [/quote]which is what JP was saying, the BMW was safer. ?
Don’t know if anyone has noticed, but Toyota has been running ads at the bottom of the front page of the Union-Trib lately…I counted the word “safe” 7 times in the ad that ran a few weeks ago! It’s almost as if they are trying to brainwash Americans into believing it.
And then this happens…[/quote]
Again, my interpretation of what jpinpb was inferring was, since this LF-a got trashed when it hit the bimmer head on, all toyotas are unsafe…And my point was considering this car was
1)prototype car (which remains to be seen if all the safety equipement was in there)
2)driven by a 67 year old who probably couldn’t withstand an accident if this magnitude versus the two younger folks in the bimmer
3)the car being lower to the ground and seemingly clobbered by a higher ride both probably going at ridiculous speedsit neither supports or refutes the claim that this incident alone that all toyotas are unsafe.
By this logic, if a Carrera GT ran plowed into a Hummer (which I pretty confident that GT would be totaled), I don’t think one could generalize that all Porsches are less safe that GM cars, or that all GM cars are safer than Porsches.
If this was a question in the GMAT critical reasoning section, I’m pretty sure selecting that answer would be incorrect π
If you want to question the “safety” of Toyotas, because of all the unintended acceleration/the issues of the Prii/the shody build quality of Tundras and Tacomas, I couldn’t agree more with you.
My personal bias are that Germans build safer cars than either the japanese or domestic, but that’s my completely unsubstantiated opinion/bias, as I have never totaled a car (yet) either on a road or track (though I have come pretty close to it 10 years ago, which I probably don’t want to repeat on the track)…
June 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM #570460CoronitaParticipant[quote=svelte]My heart goes out to his family.
[quote=flu][quote=jpinpb]It says something for the BMW safety. [/quote]
…the car car was lower to the ground and probably suffered the brunt of of the damage… [/quote]which is what JP was saying, the BMW was safer. ?
Don’t know if anyone has noticed, but Toyota has been running ads at the bottom of the front page of the Union-Trib lately…I counted the word “safe” 7 times in the ad that ran a few weeks ago! It’s almost as if they are trying to brainwash Americans into believing it.
And then this happens…[/quote]
Again, my interpretation of what jpinpb was inferring was, since this LF-a got trashed when it hit the bimmer head on, all toyotas are unsafe…And my point was considering this car was
1)prototype car (which remains to be seen if all the safety equipement was in there)
2)driven by a 67 year old who probably couldn’t withstand an accident if this magnitude versus the two younger folks in the bimmer
3)the car being lower to the ground and seemingly clobbered by a higher ride both probably going at ridiculous speedsit neither supports or refutes the claim that this incident alone that all toyotas are unsafe.
By this logic, if a Carrera GT ran plowed into a Hummer (which I pretty confident that GT would be totaled), I don’t think one could generalize that all Porsches are less safe that GM cars, or that all GM cars are safer than Porsches.
If this was a question in the GMAT critical reasoning section, I’m pretty sure selecting that answer would be incorrect π
If you want to question the “safety” of Toyotas, because of all the unintended acceleration/the issues of the Prii/the shody build quality of Tundras and Tacomas, I couldn’t agree more with you.
My personal bias are that Germans build safer cars than either the japanese or domestic, but that’s my completely unsubstantiated opinion/bias, as I have never totaled a car (yet) either on a road or track (though I have come pretty close to it 10 years ago, which I probably don’t want to repeat on the track)…
June 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM #570969CoronitaParticipant[quote=svelte]My heart goes out to his family.
[quote=flu][quote=jpinpb]It says something for the BMW safety. [/quote]
…the car car was lower to the ground and probably suffered the brunt of of the damage… [/quote]which is what JP was saying, the BMW was safer. ?
Don’t know if anyone has noticed, but Toyota has been running ads at the bottom of the front page of the Union-Trib lately…I counted the word “safe” 7 times in the ad that ran a few weeks ago! It’s almost as if they are trying to brainwash Americans into believing it.
And then this happens…[/quote]
Again, my interpretation of what jpinpb was inferring was, since this LF-a got trashed when it hit the bimmer head on, all toyotas are unsafe…And my point was considering this car was
1)prototype car (which remains to be seen if all the safety equipement was in there)
2)driven by a 67 year old who probably couldn’t withstand an accident if this magnitude versus the two younger folks in the bimmer
3)the car being lower to the ground and seemingly clobbered by a higher ride both probably going at ridiculous speedsit neither supports or refutes the claim that this incident alone that all toyotas are unsafe.
By this logic, if a Carrera GT ran plowed into a Hummer (which I pretty confident that GT would be totaled), I don’t think one could generalize that all Porsches are less safe that GM cars, or that all GM cars are safer than Porsches.
If this was a question in the GMAT critical reasoning section, I’m pretty sure selecting that answer would be incorrect π
If you want to question the “safety” of Toyotas, because of all the unintended acceleration/the issues of the Prii/the shody build quality of Tundras and Tacomas, I couldn’t agree more with you.
My personal bias are that Germans build safer cars than either the japanese or domestic, but that’s my completely unsubstantiated opinion/bias, as I have never totaled a car (yet) either on a road or track (though I have come pretty close to it 10 years ago, which I probably don’t want to repeat on the track)…
June 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM #571076CoronitaParticipant[quote=svelte]My heart goes out to his family.
[quote=flu][quote=jpinpb]It says something for the BMW safety. [/quote]
…the car car was lower to the ground and probably suffered the brunt of of the damage… [/quote]which is what JP was saying, the BMW was safer. ?
Don’t know if anyone has noticed, but Toyota has been running ads at the bottom of the front page of the Union-Trib lately…I counted the word “safe” 7 times in the ad that ran a few weeks ago! It’s almost as if they are trying to brainwash Americans into believing it.
And then this happens…[/quote]
Again, my interpretation of what jpinpb was inferring was, since this LF-a got trashed when it hit the bimmer head on, all toyotas are unsafe…And my point was considering this car was
1)prototype car (which remains to be seen if all the safety equipement was in there)
2)driven by a 67 year old who probably couldn’t withstand an accident if this magnitude versus the two younger folks in the bimmer
3)the car being lower to the ground and seemingly clobbered by a higher ride both probably going at ridiculous speedsit neither supports or refutes the claim that this incident alone that all toyotas are unsafe.
By this logic, if a Carrera GT ran plowed into a Hummer (which I pretty confident that GT would be totaled), I don’t think one could generalize that all Porsches are less safe that GM cars, or that all GM cars are safer than Porsches.
If this was a question in the GMAT critical reasoning section, I’m pretty sure selecting that answer would be incorrect π
If you want to question the “safety” of Toyotas, because of all the unintended acceleration/the issues of the Prii/the shody build quality of Tundras and Tacomas, I couldn’t agree more with you.
My personal bias are that Germans build safer cars than either the japanese or domestic, but that’s my completely unsubstantiated opinion/bias, as I have never totaled a car (yet) either on a road or track (though I have come pretty close to it 10 years ago, which I probably don’t want to repeat on the track)…
June 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM #571366CoronitaParticipant[quote=svelte]My heart goes out to his family.
[quote=flu][quote=jpinpb]It says something for the BMW safety. [/quote]
…the car car was lower to the ground and probably suffered the brunt of of the damage… [/quote]which is what JP was saying, the BMW was safer. ?
Don’t know if anyone has noticed, but Toyota has been running ads at the bottom of the front page of the Union-Trib lately…I counted the word “safe” 7 times in the ad that ran a few weeks ago! It’s almost as if they are trying to brainwash Americans into believing it.
And then this happens…[/quote]
Again, my interpretation of what jpinpb was inferring was, since this LF-a got trashed when it hit the bimmer head on, all toyotas are unsafe…And my point was considering this car was
1)prototype car (which remains to be seen if all the safety equipement was in there)
2)driven by a 67 year old who probably couldn’t withstand an accident if this magnitude versus the two younger folks in the bimmer
3)the car being lower to the ground and seemingly clobbered by a higher ride both probably going at ridiculous speedsit neither supports or refutes the claim that this incident alone that all toyotas are unsafe.
By this logic, if a Carrera GT ran plowed into a Hummer (which I pretty confident that GT would be totaled), I don’t think one could generalize that all Porsches are less safe that GM cars, or that all GM cars are safer than Porsches.
If this was a question in the GMAT critical reasoning section, I’m pretty sure selecting that answer would be incorrect π
If you want to question the “safety” of Toyotas, because of all the unintended acceleration/the issues of the Prii/the shody build quality of Tundras and Tacomas, I couldn’t agree more with you.
My personal bias are that Germans build safer cars than either the japanese or domestic, but that’s my completely unsubstantiated opinion/bias, as I have never totaled a car (yet) either on a road or track (though I have come pretty close to it 10 years ago, which I probably don’t want to repeat on the track)…
June 24, 2010 at 2:07 AM #570376anParticipantThe people in the BMW are still in critical condition. So young people in BMW in critical condition and 67 Toyota driver died. Could that be chalked up to older people not able to withstand the same crash as young people? Try running that 3 series into a Sequoia head on and tell me which one you think is safer?
June 24, 2010 at 2:07 AM #570469anParticipantThe people in the BMW are still in critical condition. So young people in BMW in critical condition and 67 Toyota driver died. Could that be chalked up to older people not able to withstand the same crash as young people? Try running that 3 series into a Sequoia head on and tell me which one you think is safer?
June 24, 2010 at 2:07 AM #570979anParticipantThe people in the BMW are still in critical condition. So young people in BMW in critical condition and 67 Toyota driver died. Could that be chalked up to older people not able to withstand the same crash as young people? Try running that 3 series into a Sequoia head on and tell me which one you think is safer?
June 24, 2010 at 2:07 AM #571086anParticipantThe people in the BMW are still in critical condition. So young people in BMW in critical condition and 67 Toyota driver died. Could that be chalked up to older people not able to withstand the same crash as young people? Try running that 3 series into a Sequoia head on and tell me which one you think is safer?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.