Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Top 20 pensioners cite city service
- This topic has 185 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 23, 2010 at 11:33 PM #596300August 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM #595291CA renterParticipant
Bravo, TexasLine.
I’m also sick of all the whining about govt workers.
We’ve spent **TRILLIONS** on Wall Street (far more than the budget and pension deficits in CA), where those who’ve created all our economic problems (including the pension problems, BTW) are getting richer than ever; yet the violent anger is missing there. I wonder why? It makes me wonder who is **really** behind all these attacks on public workers.
Distract the sheeple at all costs…turn them against one another. That seems to be the plan, and the sheeple are being led to the slaughter, just as stupid as ever.
August 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM #595384CA renterParticipantBravo, TexasLine.
I’m also sick of all the whining about govt workers.
We’ve spent **TRILLIONS** on Wall Street (far more than the budget and pension deficits in CA), where those who’ve created all our economic problems (including the pension problems, BTW) are getting richer than ever; yet the violent anger is missing there. I wonder why? It makes me wonder who is **really** behind all these attacks on public workers.
Distract the sheeple at all costs…turn them against one another. That seems to be the plan, and the sheeple are being led to the slaughter, just as stupid as ever.
August 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM #595923CA renterParticipantBravo, TexasLine.
I’m also sick of all the whining about govt workers.
We’ve spent **TRILLIONS** on Wall Street (far more than the budget and pension deficits in CA), where those who’ve created all our economic problems (including the pension problems, BTW) are getting richer than ever; yet the violent anger is missing there. I wonder why? It makes me wonder who is **really** behind all these attacks on public workers.
Distract the sheeple at all costs…turn them against one another. That seems to be the plan, and the sheeple are being led to the slaughter, just as stupid as ever.
August 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM #596032CA renterParticipantBravo, TexasLine.
I’m also sick of all the whining about govt workers.
We’ve spent **TRILLIONS** on Wall Street (far more than the budget and pension deficits in CA), where those who’ve created all our economic problems (including the pension problems, BTW) are getting richer than ever; yet the violent anger is missing there. I wonder why? It makes me wonder who is **really** behind all these attacks on public workers.
Distract the sheeple at all costs…turn them against one another. That seems to be the plan, and the sheeple are being led to the slaughter, just as stupid as ever.
August 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM #596345CA renterParticipantBravo, TexasLine.
I’m also sick of all the whining about govt workers.
We’ve spent **TRILLIONS** on Wall Street (far more than the budget and pension deficits in CA), where those who’ve created all our economic problems (including the pension problems, BTW) are getting richer than ever; yet the violent anger is missing there. I wonder why? It makes me wonder who is **really** behind all these attacks on public workers.
Distract the sheeple at all costs…turn them against one another. That seems to be the plan, and the sheeple are being led to the slaughter, just as stupid as ever.
August 24, 2010 at 1:40 AM #595296CA renterParticipantBTW, it’s funny how they always pick the most egregious examples to “stir up the masses.”
Why aren’t they also showing us the median, or even the bottom 20 pension earners?
OTOH, why aren’t they showing us the most extreme tax avoidance maneuvers of those in the top 3% of wealthiest Americans?
They take the **TOP** pensions in the public sector and make comparisons with the **average** worker in the private sector. Why aren’t they comparing apples to apples: the top retirees in the public sector vs. the top retirees in the private sector?
August 24, 2010 at 1:40 AM #595389CA renterParticipantBTW, it’s funny how they always pick the most egregious examples to “stir up the masses.”
Why aren’t they also showing us the median, or even the bottom 20 pension earners?
OTOH, why aren’t they showing us the most extreme tax avoidance maneuvers of those in the top 3% of wealthiest Americans?
They take the **TOP** pensions in the public sector and make comparisons with the **average** worker in the private sector. Why aren’t they comparing apples to apples: the top retirees in the public sector vs. the top retirees in the private sector?
August 24, 2010 at 1:40 AM #595928CA renterParticipantBTW, it’s funny how they always pick the most egregious examples to “stir up the masses.”
Why aren’t they also showing us the median, or even the bottom 20 pension earners?
OTOH, why aren’t they showing us the most extreme tax avoidance maneuvers of those in the top 3% of wealthiest Americans?
They take the **TOP** pensions in the public sector and make comparisons with the **average** worker in the private sector. Why aren’t they comparing apples to apples: the top retirees in the public sector vs. the top retirees in the private sector?
August 24, 2010 at 1:40 AM #596037CA renterParticipantBTW, it’s funny how they always pick the most egregious examples to “stir up the masses.”
Why aren’t they also showing us the median, or even the bottom 20 pension earners?
OTOH, why aren’t they showing us the most extreme tax avoidance maneuvers of those in the top 3% of wealthiest Americans?
They take the **TOP** pensions in the public sector and make comparisons with the **average** worker in the private sector. Why aren’t they comparing apples to apples: the top retirees in the public sector vs. the top retirees in the private sector?
August 24, 2010 at 1:40 AM #596350CA renterParticipantBTW, it’s funny how they always pick the most egregious examples to “stir up the masses.”
Why aren’t they also showing us the median, or even the bottom 20 pension earners?
OTOH, why aren’t they showing us the most extreme tax avoidance maneuvers of those in the top 3% of wealthiest Americans?
They take the **TOP** pensions in the public sector and make comparisons with the **average** worker in the private sector. Why aren’t they comparing apples to apples: the top retirees in the public sector vs. the top retirees in the private sector?
August 24, 2010 at 1:46 AM #595301CA renterParticipant[quote=pjwal]This makes me sick to my stomach. Some joke IT dinosaur, that probably worked most his life fixing printer problems, whom made it “all the way up” to Director if IT (where most of his job still consisted of fixing printer problems) is now sitting pretty on a 139k/year pension. It’s not he was actually really challenged with a budget or had to worry about profitably at all during his career. Not like he actually had to innovate or keep his skill set up with changing technology. Not like he actually worked weekends or ever averaged more than 38 hours per week.[/quote]
Some pretty bold assumptions there.
I’ve worked in both private and public sectors, and can say for a fact that the standards for public workers are higher than for those in the private sector. Also, there is additional liability in the public sector that is not there in the private sector, which is why they have to hire better qualified candidates in the first place.
August 24, 2010 at 1:46 AM #595394CA renterParticipant[quote=pjwal]This makes me sick to my stomach. Some joke IT dinosaur, that probably worked most his life fixing printer problems, whom made it “all the way up” to Director if IT (where most of his job still consisted of fixing printer problems) is now sitting pretty on a 139k/year pension. It’s not he was actually really challenged with a budget or had to worry about profitably at all during his career. Not like he actually had to innovate or keep his skill set up with changing technology. Not like he actually worked weekends or ever averaged more than 38 hours per week.[/quote]
Some pretty bold assumptions there.
I’ve worked in both private and public sectors, and can say for a fact that the standards for public workers are higher than for those in the private sector. Also, there is additional liability in the public sector that is not there in the private sector, which is why they have to hire better qualified candidates in the first place.
August 24, 2010 at 1:46 AM #595933CA renterParticipant[quote=pjwal]This makes me sick to my stomach. Some joke IT dinosaur, that probably worked most his life fixing printer problems, whom made it “all the way up” to Director if IT (where most of his job still consisted of fixing printer problems) is now sitting pretty on a 139k/year pension. It’s not he was actually really challenged with a budget or had to worry about profitably at all during his career. Not like he actually had to innovate or keep his skill set up with changing technology. Not like he actually worked weekends or ever averaged more than 38 hours per week.[/quote]
Some pretty bold assumptions there.
I’ve worked in both private and public sectors, and can say for a fact that the standards for public workers are higher than for those in the private sector. Also, there is additional liability in the public sector that is not there in the private sector, which is why they have to hire better qualified candidates in the first place.
August 24, 2010 at 1:46 AM #596042CA renterParticipant[quote=pjwal]This makes me sick to my stomach. Some joke IT dinosaur, that probably worked most his life fixing printer problems, whom made it “all the way up” to Director if IT (where most of his job still consisted of fixing printer problems) is now sitting pretty on a 139k/year pension. It’s not he was actually really challenged with a budget or had to worry about profitably at all during his career. Not like he actually had to innovate or keep his skill set up with changing technology. Not like he actually worked weekends or ever averaged more than 38 hours per week.[/quote]
Some pretty bold assumptions there.
I’ve worked in both private and public sectors, and can say for a fact that the standards for public workers are higher than for those in the private sector. Also, there is additional liability in the public sector that is not there in the private sector, which is why they have to hire better qualified candidates in the first place.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.