Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Timing the Bottom
- This topic has 483 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by lurkor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2007 at 9:24 AM #110412December 6, 2007 at 9:24 AM #110415RatherOpinionatedParticipant
Everytime we get an intelligent conversation going, someone needs to chime in about how much they can’t stand Mr/Mrs NamedAfterAProperty. Explain how my recent reply did not fit within the criteria of this blog’s purpose? Discussing the bottom and identifying methodology perfectly fits the title of this string, “Timing the Bottom”. If you don’t value this discussion, let it die out, and perhaps you should respond to the string about “price collapse in Chula Vista” – that looks like an engaging discussion.
Back to the discussion at hand.
December 6, 2007 at 9:25 AM #110253Rich ToscanoKeymasterSorry, not buying it. None of these things are “priced in” to the housing market because as recent history has made extremely clear, price is the most lagging indicator when it comes to housing. The “technicals” (months of supply, NODs, volume, etc) have continued to get worse, and the prices have continued to follow the technicals down months later.
Also, homes are still quite overpriced based on their historical valuations and income earning potential, so trying to make it sound like they are some sort of screaming bargain doesn’t hold up.
Finally, your posting via multiple logins is a transparent attempt to make it seem like your ideas, such as they are, have widespread support. If the ideas are so great why do you need to resort to such tactics?
Sorry to feed the trolls, everyone, but I just can’t believe these guy/gal went through the trouble to snoop on me instead of researching the most rudimentary facts about the market itself. I couldn’t help myself!
Rich
December 6, 2007 at 9:25 AM #110369Rich ToscanoKeymasterSorry, not buying it. None of these things are “priced in” to the housing market because as recent history has made extremely clear, price is the most lagging indicator when it comes to housing. The “technicals” (months of supply, NODs, volume, etc) have continued to get worse, and the prices have continued to follow the technicals down months later.
Also, homes are still quite overpriced based on their historical valuations and income earning potential, so trying to make it sound like they are some sort of screaming bargain doesn’t hold up.
Finally, your posting via multiple logins is a transparent attempt to make it seem like your ideas, such as they are, have widespread support. If the ideas are so great why do you need to resort to such tactics?
Sorry to feed the trolls, everyone, but I just can’t believe these guy/gal went through the trouble to snoop on me instead of researching the most rudimentary facts about the market itself. I couldn’t help myself!
Rich
December 6, 2007 at 9:25 AM #110400Rich ToscanoKeymasterSorry, not buying it. None of these things are “priced in” to the housing market because as recent history has made extremely clear, price is the most lagging indicator when it comes to housing. The “technicals” (months of supply, NODs, volume, etc) have continued to get worse, and the prices have continued to follow the technicals down months later.
Also, homes are still quite overpriced based on their historical valuations and income earning potential, so trying to make it sound like they are some sort of screaming bargain doesn’t hold up.
Finally, your posting via multiple logins is a transparent attempt to make it seem like your ideas, such as they are, have widespread support. If the ideas are so great why do you need to resort to such tactics?
Sorry to feed the trolls, everyone, but I just can’t believe these guy/gal went through the trouble to snoop on me instead of researching the most rudimentary facts about the market itself. I couldn’t help myself!
Rich
December 6, 2007 at 9:25 AM #110417Rich ToscanoKeymasterSorry, not buying it. None of these things are “priced in” to the housing market because as recent history has made extremely clear, price is the most lagging indicator when it comes to housing. The “technicals” (months of supply, NODs, volume, etc) have continued to get worse, and the prices have continued to follow the technicals down months later.
Also, homes are still quite overpriced based on their historical valuations and income earning potential, so trying to make it sound like they are some sort of screaming bargain doesn’t hold up.
Finally, your posting via multiple logins is a transparent attempt to make it seem like your ideas, such as they are, have widespread support. If the ideas are so great why do you need to resort to such tactics?
Sorry to feed the trolls, everyone, but I just can’t believe these guy/gal went through the trouble to snoop on me instead of researching the most rudimentary facts about the market itself. I couldn’t help myself!
Rich
December 6, 2007 at 9:25 AM #110419Rich ToscanoKeymasterSorry, not buying it. None of these things are “priced in” to the housing market because as recent history has made extremely clear, price is the most lagging indicator when it comes to housing. The “technicals” (months of supply, NODs, volume, etc) have continued to get worse, and the prices have continued to follow the technicals down months later.
Also, homes are still quite overpriced based on their historical valuations and income earning potential, so trying to make it sound like they are some sort of screaming bargain doesn’t hold up.
Finally, your posting via multiple logins is a transparent attempt to make it seem like your ideas, such as they are, have widespread support. If the ideas are so great why do you need to resort to such tactics?
Sorry to feed the trolls, everyone, but I just can’t believe these guy/gal went through the trouble to snoop on me instead of researching the most rudimentary facts about the market itself. I couldn’t help myself!
Rich
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110258RatherOpinionatedParticipantYou are all so smart, but this is my final moniker and I no longer need to resort to marketing properties or rentals. Now I can fit in with the rest of the lemurs and make only appropriate comments that fit within the scope of the discussions. Love me or hate me, at least the discussions may get a bit more heated (which is good, right)?
Sincerely,
The Troll of Piggingtonville
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110374RatherOpinionatedParticipantYou are all so smart, but this is my final moniker and I no longer need to resort to marketing properties or rentals. Now I can fit in with the rest of the lemurs and make only appropriate comments that fit within the scope of the discussions. Love me or hate me, at least the discussions may get a bit more heated (which is good, right)?
Sincerely,
The Troll of Piggingtonville
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110406RatherOpinionatedParticipantYou are all so smart, but this is my final moniker and I no longer need to resort to marketing properties or rentals. Now I can fit in with the rest of the lemurs and make only appropriate comments that fit within the scope of the discussions. Love me or hate me, at least the discussions may get a bit more heated (which is good, right)?
Sincerely,
The Troll of Piggingtonville
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110422RatherOpinionatedParticipantYou are all so smart, but this is my final moniker and I no longer need to resort to marketing properties or rentals. Now I can fit in with the rest of the lemurs and make only appropriate comments that fit within the scope of the discussions. Love me or hate me, at least the discussions may get a bit more heated (which is good, right)?
Sincerely,
The Troll of Piggingtonville
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110424RatherOpinionatedParticipantYou are all so smart, but this is my final moniker and I no longer need to resort to marketing properties or rentals. Now I can fit in with the rest of the lemurs and make only appropriate comments that fit within the scope of the discussions. Love me or hate me, at least the discussions may get a bit more heated (which is good, right)?
Sincerely,
The Troll of Piggingtonville
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110263sdduuuudeParticipantMaybe you should publish his IP address – heh, heh.
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110380sdduuuudeParticipantMaybe you should publish his IP address – heh, heh.
December 6, 2007 at 9:33 AM #110411sdduuuudeParticipantMaybe you should publish his IP address – heh, heh.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.