- This topic has 850 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2010 at 9:50 AM #530527March 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM #529596
briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
So under your system, if someone is sick near death, doesn’t have insurance and can’t pay, then what? Let that person die on the street?
Last time I checked, Medicaid already takes care of these…[/quote]
I was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
March 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM #529725briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
So under your system, if someone is sick near death, doesn’t have insurance and can’t pay, then what? Let that person die on the street?
Last time I checked, Medicaid already takes care of these…[/quote]
I was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
March 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM #530174briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
So under your system, if someone is sick near death, doesn’t have insurance and can’t pay, then what? Let that person die on the street?
Last time I checked, Medicaid already takes care of these…[/quote]
I was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
March 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM #530273briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
So under your system, if someone is sick near death, doesn’t have insurance and can’t pay, then what? Let that person die on the street?
Last time I checked, Medicaid already takes care of these…[/quote]
I was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
March 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM #530532briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
So under your system, if someone is sick near death, doesn’t have insurance and can’t pay, then what? Let that person die on the street?
Last time I checked, Medicaid already takes care of these…[/quote]
I was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
March 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM #529606ucodegen
ParticipantI was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?
BTW: I am one of the so-called uninsured. Basically, I am self insured.
March 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM #529735ucodegen
ParticipantI was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?
BTW: I am one of the so-called uninsured. Basically, I am self insured.
March 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM #530184ucodegen
ParticipantI was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?
BTW: I am one of the so-called uninsured. Basically, I am self insured.
March 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM #530283ucodegen
ParticipantI was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?
BTW: I am one of the so-called uninsured. Basically, I am self insured.
March 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM #530542ucodegen
ParticipantI was asking Bob about his system of why-should-I-pay-for-you.
Thankfully we have Medicaid. But Medicaid only covers the poor and destitute. It’s means tested and people need to apply and periodically reapply. The periods of lapse are very frequent.
There are millions who are not covered at all.
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?
BTW: I am one of the so-called uninsured. Basically, I am self insured.
March 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM #529617briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?[/quote]If we are going to think your way, we should first repeal the property taxes. Why should I pay for other people’s kids’ education?
Having babies is a choice that people make.
Parents should pay to send their kids to public schools. Only poor kids would get subsidized education.
I think that health care is more important than education.
March 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM #529745briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?[/quote]If we are going to think your way, we should first repeal the property taxes. Why should I pay for other people’s kids’ education?
Having babies is a choice that people make.
Parents should pay to send their kids to public schools. Only poor kids would get subsidized education.
I think that health care is more important than education.
March 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM #530194briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?[/quote]If we are going to think your way, we should first repeal the property taxes. Why should I pay for other people’s kids’ education?
Having babies is a choice that people make.
Parents should pay to send their kids to public schools. Only poor kids would get subsidized education.
I think that health care is more important than education.
March 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM #530293briansd1
Guest[quote=ucodegen]
It is a worthwhile question to ask: “why-should-I-pay-for-you?”. People need to be responsible for their own lives and should not expect others to take care of them and their irresponsible acts. Why should those that act responsibly be penalized? That said, there should be some way to cover those who are beset by circumstances beyond their control, but how do you tell that it was circumstances beyond their control vs. lack of responsibility in their behavior?[/quote]If we are going to think your way, we should first repeal the property taxes. Why should I pay for other people’s kids’ education?
Having babies is a choice that people make.
Parents should pay to send their kids to public schools. Only poor kids would get subsidized education.
I think that health care is more important than education.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.