- This topic has 850 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM #529917March 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM #528991AecetiaParticipant
That should completely dumb down the doctors. That kind of pay is not worth going to med school for. I do not know what you live on, but that is not exactly high pay for CA. I think firefighters and the higher echelons of law enforcement easily make that much. I think physicians should be well paid. I would imagine that quite a few of the folks on Piggington make a least 150.
March 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM #529120AecetiaParticipantThat should completely dumb down the doctors. That kind of pay is not worth going to med school for. I do not know what you live on, but that is not exactly high pay for CA. I think firefighters and the higher echelons of law enforcement easily make that much. I think physicians should be well paid. I would imagine that quite a few of the folks on Piggington make a least 150.
March 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM #529569AecetiaParticipantThat should completely dumb down the doctors. That kind of pay is not worth going to med school for. I do not know what you live on, but that is not exactly high pay for CA. I think firefighters and the higher echelons of law enforcement easily make that much. I think physicians should be well paid. I would imagine that quite a few of the folks on Piggington make a least 150.
March 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM #529668AecetiaParticipantThat should completely dumb down the doctors. That kind of pay is not worth going to med school for. I do not know what you live on, but that is not exactly high pay for CA. I think firefighters and the higher echelons of law enforcement easily make that much. I think physicians should be well paid. I would imagine that quite a few of the folks on Piggington make a least 150.
March 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM #529927AecetiaParticipantThat should completely dumb down the doctors. That kind of pay is not worth going to med school for. I do not know what you live on, but that is not exactly high pay for CA. I think firefighters and the higher echelons of law enforcement easily make that much. I think physicians should be well paid. I would imagine that quite a few of the folks on Piggington make a least 150.
March 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM #529005CoronitaParticipant[quote=Aecetia]By Janet I. Tu
Seattle Times staff reporter
Walgreens’ decision: http://news.walgreens.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5288
“Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won’t take any new Medicaid patients, saying that filling their prescriptions is a money-losing proposition β the latest development in an ongoing dispute over Medicaid reimbursement.”[/quote]
Funny you should mention this. My primary care physician says that he is no longer offering vaccines/flu shots/etc unless his patients pay out of pocket.
Last time I went get a typhoid/tenanus/etc.
He basically said that it costs him more to purchase the vaccines/shots/etc than insurance co’s are willing to reimburse him for them…So he tells me that I pay out of pocket and can go seek reimbursement from my own insurance co myself.He also stopped taking new patients and physical exams are now scheduled 6 months out. Basically he use to give physicals to folks at the same time that they came in for regular checkups…Except insurance co’s didn’t like that and didn’t allow him to bill for the physical. He was eating the costs himself for awhile…
Looks like applying for Taiwanese citizenship and getting medical care overseas might be a reality moving forward π
I was hoping this legislation would actually allow folks to “save” for medical expenses.
Slightly slanted question…
Also, now that everyone is expected to have medical insurance or pay a fine each year. So I guess this is somewhat good news for hospitals in dealing with uninsured folks, since to some extent folks now have medical coverage (I would asume)…However, while this rule applies to U.S. citizens and I guess folks with P.R., what does this do with folks that are not here legally? Obviously they aren’t part of this plan. Do hospitals continue to provide non-legal residence free medical care? Just curious. Does anyone else have data about the percentage of uninsured that would now be insurable versus the percentage of folks that these new changes don’t apply to?March 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM #529136CoronitaParticipant[quote=Aecetia]By Janet I. Tu
Seattle Times staff reporter
Walgreens’ decision: http://news.walgreens.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5288
“Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won’t take any new Medicaid patients, saying that filling their prescriptions is a money-losing proposition β the latest development in an ongoing dispute over Medicaid reimbursement.”[/quote]
Funny you should mention this. My primary care physician says that he is no longer offering vaccines/flu shots/etc unless his patients pay out of pocket.
Last time I went get a typhoid/tenanus/etc.
He basically said that it costs him more to purchase the vaccines/shots/etc than insurance co’s are willing to reimburse him for them…So he tells me that I pay out of pocket and can go seek reimbursement from my own insurance co myself.He also stopped taking new patients and physical exams are now scheduled 6 months out. Basically he use to give physicals to folks at the same time that they came in for regular checkups…Except insurance co’s didn’t like that and didn’t allow him to bill for the physical. He was eating the costs himself for awhile…
Looks like applying for Taiwanese citizenship and getting medical care overseas might be a reality moving forward π
I was hoping this legislation would actually allow folks to “save” for medical expenses.
Slightly slanted question…
Also, now that everyone is expected to have medical insurance or pay a fine each year. So I guess this is somewhat good news for hospitals in dealing with uninsured folks, since to some extent folks now have medical coverage (I would asume)…However, while this rule applies to U.S. citizens and I guess folks with P.R., what does this do with folks that are not here legally? Obviously they aren’t part of this plan. Do hospitals continue to provide non-legal residence free medical care? Just curious. Does anyone else have data about the percentage of uninsured that would now be insurable versus the percentage of folks that these new changes don’t apply to?March 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM #529584CoronitaParticipant[quote=Aecetia]By Janet I. Tu
Seattle Times staff reporter
Walgreens’ decision: http://news.walgreens.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5288
“Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won’t take any new Medicaid patients, saying that filling their prescriptions is a money-losing proposition β the latest development in an ongoing dispute over Medicaid reimbursement.”[/quote]
Funny you should mention this. My primary care physician says that he is no longer offering vaccines/flu shots/etc unless his patients pay out of pocket.
Last time I went get a typhoid/tenanus/etc.
He basically said that it costs him more to purchase the vaccines/shots/etc than insurance co’s are willing to reimburse him for them…So he tells me that I pay out of pocket and can go seek reimbursement from my own insurance co myself.He also stopped taking new patients and physical exams are now scheduled 6 months out. Basically he use to give physicals to folks at the same time that they came in for regular checkups…Except insurance co’s didn’t like that and didn’t allow him to bill for the physical. He was eating the costs himself for awhile…
Looks like applying for Taiwanese citizenship and getting medical care overseas might be a reality moving forward π
I was hoping this legislation would actually allow folks to “save” for medical expenses.
Slightly slanted question…
Also, now that everyone is expected to have medical insurance or pay a fine each year. So I guess this is somewhat good news for hospitals in dealing with uninsured folks, since to some extent folks now have medical coverage (I would asume)…However, while this rule applies to U.S. citizens and I guess folks with P.R., what does this do with folks that are not here legally? Obviously they aren’t part of this plan. Do hospitals continue to provide non-legal residence free medical care? Just curious. Does anyone else have data about the percentage of uninsured that would now be insurable versus the percentage of folks that these new changes don’t apply to?March 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM #529683CoronitaParticipant[quote=Aecetia]By Janet I. Tu
Seattle Times staff reporter
Walgreens’ decision: http://news.walgreens.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5288
“Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won’t take any new Medicaid patients, saying that filling their prescriptions is a money-losing proposition β the latest development in an ongoing dispute over Medicaid reimbursement.”[/quote]
Funny you should mention this. My primary care physician says that he is no longer offering vaccines/flu shots/etc unless his patients pay out of pocket.
Last time I went get a typhoid/tenanus/etc.
He basically said that it costs him more to purchase the vaccines/shots/etc than insurance co’s are willing to reimburse him for them…So he tells me that I pay out of pocket and can go seek reimbursement from my own insurance co myself.He also stopped taking new patients and physical exams are now scheduled 6 months out. Basically he use to give physicals to folks at the same time that they came in for regular checkups…Except insurance co’s didn’t like that and didn’t allow him to bill for the physical. He was eating the costs himself for awhile…
Looks like applying for Taiwanese citizenship and getting medical care overseas might be a reality moving forward π
I was hoping this legislation would actually allow folks to “save” for medical expenses.
Slightly slanted question…
Also, now that everyone is expected to have medical insurance or pay a fine each year. So I guess this is somewhat good news for hospitals in dealing with uninsured folks, since to some extent folks now have medical coverage (I would asume)…However, while this rule applies to U.S. citizens and I guess folks with P.R., what does this do with folks that are not here legally? Obviously they aren’t part of this plan. Do hospitals continue to provide non-legal residence free medical care? Just curious. Does anyone else have data about the percentage of uninsured that would now be insurable versus the percentage of folks that these new changes don’t apply to?March 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM #529942CoronitaParticipant[quote=Aecetia]By Janet I. Tu
Seattle Times staff reporter
Walgreens’ decision: http://news.walgreens.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5288
“Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won’t take any new Medicaid patients, saying that filling their prescriptions is a money-losing proposition β the latest development in an ongoing dispute over Medicaid reimbursement.”[/quote]
Funny you should mention this. My primary care physician says that he is no longer offering vaccines/flu shots/etc unless his patients pay out of pocket.
Last time I went get a typhoid/tenanus/etc.
He basically said that it costs him more to purchase the vaccines/shots/etc than insurance co’s are willing to reimburse him for them…So he tells me that I pay out of pocket and can go seek reimbursement from my own insurance co myself.He also stopped taking new patients and physical exams are now scheduled 6 months out. Basically he use to give physicals to folks at the same time that they came in for regular checkups…Except insurance co’s didn’t like that and didn’t allow him to bill for the physical. He was eating the costs himself for awhile…
Looks like applying for Taiwanese citizenship and getting medical care overseas might be a reality moving forward π
I was hoping this legislation would actually allow folks to “save” for medical expenses.
Slightly slanted question…
Also, now that everyone is expected to have medical insurance or pay a fine each year. So I guess this is somewhat good news for hospitals in dealing with uninsured folks, since to some extent folks now have medical coverage (I would asume)…However, while this rule applies to U.S. citizens and I guess folks with P.R., what does this do with folks that are not here legally? Obviously they aren’t part of this plan. Do hospitals continue to provide non-legal residence free medical care? Just curious. Does anyone else have data about the percentage of uninsured that would now be insurable versus the percentage of folks that these new changes don’t apply to?March 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM #529010SK in CVParticipantDoctors whine about not being paid enough. All the time. For many of them, their favorite pastime is whining about taxes. Though having worked as a tax advisor to scores of them, very few had a clue what they were talking about.
They whined like crazy about medicare almost 50 years ago. But medicare began meteoric rise in physicians’ incomes. It created wednesday golf day. It helped do away with house calls.
In fairness, for most specialties, their incomes have remained stagnant or declined over the last 20 years, and they don’t play golf on wednesdays as often as they used to. They work harder and different than they did 20 years ago.
My prediction, they (along with other allied health care providers) will be the single largest beneficiary of this bill, behind the currently uninsured. A bigger beneficiary than insurance companies. A bigger beneficiary than pharmaceutical companies. And a bigger beneficiary than hospitals. They won’t get paid more for each service. But they will have lots more paying patients.
March 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM #529141SK in CVParticipantDoctors whine about not being paid enough. All the time. For many of them, their favorite pastime is whining about taxes. Though having worked as a tax advisor to scores of them, very few had a clue what they were talking about.
They whined like crazy about medicare almost 50 years ago. But medicare began meteoric rise in physicians’ incomes. It created wednesday golf day. It helped do away with house calls.
In fairness, for most specialties, their incomes have remained stagnant or declined over the last 20 years, and they don’t play golf on wednesdays as often as they used to. They work harder and different than they did 20 years ago.
My prediction, they (along with other allied health care providers) will be the single largest beneficiary of this bill, behind the currently uninsured. A bigger beneficiary than insurance companies. A bigger beneficiary than pharmaceutical companies. And a bigger beneficiary than hospitals. They won’t get paid more for each service. But they will have lots more paying patients.
March 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM #529589SK in CVParticipantDoctors whine about not being paid enough. All the time. For many of them, their favorite pastime is whining about taxes. Though having worked as a tax advisor to scores of them, very few had a clue what they were talking about.
They whined like crazy about medicare almost 50 years ago. But medicare began meteoric rise in physicians’ incomes. It created wednesday golf day. It helped do away with house calls.
In fairness, for most specialties, their incomes have remained stagnant or declined over the last 20 years, and they don’t play golf on wednesdays as often as they used to. They work harder and different than they did 20 years ago.
My prediction, they (along with other allied health care providers) will be the single largest beneficiary of this bill, behind the currently uninsured. A bigger beneficiary than insurance companies. A bigger beneficiary than pharmaceutical companies. And a bigger beneficiary than hospitals. They won’t get paid more for each service. But they will have lots more paying patients.
March 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM #529688SK in CVParticipantDoctors whine about not being paid enough. All the time. For many of them, their favorite pastime is whining about taxes. Though having worked as a tax advisor to scores of them, very few had a clue what they were talking about.
They whined like crazy about medicare almost 50 years ago. But medicare began meteoric rise in physicians’ incomes. It created wednesday golf day. It helped do away with house calls.
In fairness, for most specialties, their incomes have remained stagnant or declined over the last 20 years, and they don’t play golf on wednesdays as often as they used to. They work harder and different than they did 20 years ago.
My prediction, they (along with other allied health care providers) will be the single largest beneficiary of this bill, behind the currently uninsured. A bigger beneficiary than insurance companies. A bigger beneficiary than pharmaceutical companies. And a bigger beneficiary than hospitals. They won’t get paid more for each service. But they will have lots more paying patients.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.