- This topic has 75 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by CBad.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 11, 2010 at 10:28 PM #501441January 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM #501871CA renterParticipant
Don’t worry, it’s coming. **Everyone** is getting hit. IMHO, this is just the beginning.
BTW, yes, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, but nobody is willing to address the real problems (illegal immigration and pension reform). Schools, prisons, and social infrastructure (as well as physical infrastructure) are all heavily impacted by illegal immigration. If employers want them here, that’s fine; but they need to pay for them and all their dependents out of their own pockets. There is no reason for taxpayers to subsidize the profits of employers who hire illegal immigrants.
———————–Payroll cuts:
The governor plans to end three-day-a month furloughs by July, which have resulted in a 14 percent pay cut for state employees. In its place, he wants to reduce worker salaries by five percent, increase their monthly pension contribution to CalPERS and order department heads to reduce personnel to achieve a further 5 percent reduction in payroll.
Read more: http://www.modbee.com/editorials/story/1004030.html#ixzz0cNtiWSRV
January 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM #502214CA renterParticipantDon’t worry, it’s coming. **Everyone** is getting hit. IMHO, this is just the beginning.
BTW, yes, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, but nobody is willing to address the real problems (illegal immigration and pension reform). Schools, prisons, and social infrastructure (as well as physical infrastructure) are all heavily impacted by illegal immigration. If employers want them here, that’s fine; but they need to pay for them and all their dependents out of their own pockets. There is no reason for taxpayers to subsidize the profits of employers who hire illegal immigrants.
———————–Payroll cuts:
The governor plans to end three-day-a month furloughs by July, which have resulted in a 14 percent pay cut for state employees. In its place, he wants to reduce worker salaries by five percent, increase their monthly pension contribution to CalPERS and order department heads to reduce personnel to achieve a further 5 percent reduction in payroll.
Read more: http://www.modbee.com/editorials/story/1004030.html#ixzz0cNtiWSRV
January 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM #501968CA renterParticipantDon’t worry, it’s coming. **Everyone** is getting hit. IMHO, this is just the beginning.
BTW, yes, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, but nobody is willing to address the real problems (illegal immigration and pension reform). Schools, prisons, and social infrastructure (as well as physical infrastructure) are all heavily impacted by illegal immigration. If employers want them here, that’s fine; but they need to pay for them and all their dependents out of their own pockets. There is no reason for taxpayers to subsidize the profits of employers who hire illegal immigrants.
———————–Payroll cuts:
The governor plans to end three-day-a month furloughs by July, which have resulted in a 14 percent pay cut for state employees. In its place, he wants to reduce worker salaries by five percent, increase their monthly pension contribution to CalPERS and order department heads to reduce personnel to achieve a further 5 percent reduction in payroll.
Read more: http://www.modbee.com/editorials/story/1004030.html#ixzz0cNtiWSRV
January 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM #501475CA renterParticipantDon’t worry, it’s coming. **Everyone** is getting hit. IMHO, this is just the beginning.
BTW, yes, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, but nobody is willing to address the real problems (illegal immigration and pension reform). Schools, prisons, and social infrastructure (as well as physical infrastructure) are all heavily impacted by illegal immigration. If employers want them here, that’s fine; but they need to pay for them and all their dependents out of their own pockets. There is no reason for taxpayers to subsidize the profits of employers who hire illegal immigrants.
———————–Payroll cuts:
The governor plans to end three-day-a month furloughs by July, which have resulted in a 14 percent pay cut for state employees. In its place, he wants to reduce worker salaries by five percent, increase their monthly pension contribution to CalPERS and order department heads to reduce personnel to achieve a further 5 percent reduction in payroll.
Read more: http://www.modbee.com/editorials/story/1004030.html#ixzz0cNtiWSRV
January 12, 2010 at 12:23 AM #501326CA renterParticipantDon’t worry, it’s coming. **Everyone** is getting hit. IMHO, this is just the beginning.
BTW, yes, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, but nobody is willing to address the real problems (illegal immigration and pension reform). Schools, prisons, and social infrastructure (as well as physical infrastructure) are all heavily impacted by illegal immigration. If employers want them here, that’s fine; but they need to pay for them and all their dependents out of their own pockets. There is no reason for taxpayers to subsidize the profits of employers who hire illegal immigrants.
———————–Payroll cuts:
The governor plans to end three-day-a month furloughs by July, which have resulted in a 14 percent pay cut for state employees. In its place, he wants to reduce worker salaries by five percent, increase their monthly pension contribution to CalPERS and order department heads to reduce personnel to achieve a further 5 percent reduction in payroll.
Read more: http://www.modbee.com/editorials/story/1004030.html#ixzz0cNtiWSRV
January 12, 2010 at 8:15 AM #501924(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI agree 100% with your point AN. For every property that changes hands and has a new value n(up or down) there are a hundred or more that see the clockwork like increase of 2%. No suprise, then that county tax revenue continues to climb.
January 12, 2010 at 8:15 AM #501530(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI agree 100% with your point AN. For every property that changes hands and has a new value n(up or down) there are a hundred or more that see the clockwork like increase of 2%. No suprise, then that county tax revenue continues to climb.
January 12, 2010 at 8:15 AM #502267(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI agree 100% with your point AN. For every property that changes hands and has a new value n(up or down) there are a hundred or more that see the clockwork like increase of 2%. No suprise, then that county tax revenue continues to climb.
January 12, 2010 at 8:15 AM #501380(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI agree 100% with your point AN. For every property that changes hands and has a new value n(up or down) there are a hundred or more that see the clockwork like increase of 2%. No suprise, then that county tax revenue continues to climb.
January 12, 2010 at 8:15 AM #502021(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI agree 100% with your point AN. For every property that changes hands and has a new value n(up or down) there are a hundred or more that see the clockwork like increase of 2%. No suprise, then that county tax revenue continues to climb.
January 12, 2010 at 8:29 AM #502282CBadParticipantYes and for every anecdote we have about so and so not paying their property taxes, there are thousands more that just plug along paying their 2% hike every year without a peep. Every year we have more and more places to collect property tax on as well. And if someone’s not paying, the recycling of the property will end up with payment, and then most likely a normal steady flow of taxes coming in on it again. The real mystery is why the schools still suck a** when around 40% of the taxes are allocated for them.
January 12, 2010 at 8:29 AM #502035CBadParticipantYes and for every anecdote we have about so and so not paying their property taxes, there are thousands more that just plug along paying their 2% hike every year without a peep. Every year we have more and more places to collect property tax on as well. And if someone’s not paying, the recycling of the property will end up with payment, and then most likely a normal steady flow of taxes coming in on it again. The real mystery is why the schools still suck a** when around 40% of the taxes are allocated for them.
January 12, 2010 at 8:29 AM #501939CBadParticipantYes and for every anecdote we have about so and so not paying their property taxes, there are thousands more that just plug along paying their 2% hike every year without a peep. Every year we have more and more places to collect property tax on as well. And if someone’s not paying, the recycling of the property will end up with payment, and then most likely a normal steady flow of taxes coming in on it again. The real mystery is why the schools still suck a** when around 40% of the taxes are allocated for them.
January 12, 2010 at 8:29 AM #501395CBadParticipantYes and for every anecdote we have about so and so not paying their property taxes, there are thousands more that just plug along paying their 2% hike every year without a peep. Every year we have more and more places to collect property tax on as well. And if someone’s not paying, the recycling of the property will end up with payment, and then most likely a normal steady flow of taxes coming in on it again. The real mystery is why the schools still suck a** when around 40% of the taxes are allocated for them.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.