- This topic has 35 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by sjk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 4, 2010 at 9:14 AM #635980December 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM #636504XBoxBoyParticipant
[quote=Rustico]BTW, I mostly retract my concern that Wikileaks is working with national propaganda agents. I won’t say the same for the NYT or WP yet.[/quote]
My hunch is that wikileaks is legit, but honestly, how the heck do we know? I mean, wouldn’t that be just a brilliant move to create this site to spread your own propaganda? It’s these kinds of questions that keep me up at night.
December 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM #636186XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=Rustico]BTW, I mostly retract my concern that Wikileaks is working with national propaganda agents. I won’t say the same for the NYT or WP yet.[/quote]
My hunch is that wikileaks is legit, but honestly, how the heck do we know? I mean, wouldn’t that be just a brilliant move to create this site to spread your own propaganda? It’s these kinds of questions that keep me up at night.
December 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM #636055XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=Rustico]BTW, I mostly retract my concern that Wikileaks is working with national propaganda agents. I won’t say the same for the NYT or WP yet.[/quote]
My hunch is that wikileaks is legit, but honestly, how the heck do we know? I mean, wouldn’t that be just a brilliant move to create this site to spread your own propaganda? It’s these kinds of questions that keep me up at night.
December 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM #635480XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=Rustico]BTW, I mostly retract my concern that Wikileaks is working with national propaganda agents. I won’t say the same for the NYT or WP yet.[/quote]
My hunch is that wikileaks is legit, but honestly, how the heck do we know? I mean, wouldn’t that be just a brilliant move to create this site to spread your own propaganda? It’s these kinds of questions that keep me up at night.
December 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM #635403XBoxBoyParticipant[quote=Rustico]BTW, I mostly retract my concern that Wikileaks is working with national propaganda agents. I won’t say the same for the NYT or WP yet.[/quote]
My hunch is that wikileaks is legit, but honestly, how the heck do we know? I mean, wouldn’t that be just a brilliant move to create this site to spread your own propaganda? It’s these kinds of questions that keep me up at night.
December 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM #635500permabearParticipantNah, you’ve got to read up on the history of Assange. Plenty of corroborated accounts as to how he’s been extremely anti-establishment since his college years. I think he’s one of those guys who would love to see the world burn. But as a means to an end – peeling away the ridiculous corporate-owned fabrication passing for “free press” in the US these days – he’s fantastic.
December 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM #636206permabearParticipantNah, you’ve got to read up on the history of Assange. Plenty of corroborated accounts as to how he’s been extremely anti-establishment since his college years. I think he’s one of those guys who would love to see the world burn. But as a means to an end – peeling away the ridiculous corporate-owned fabrication passing for “free press” in the US these days – he’s fantastic.
December 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM #636075permabearParticipantNah, you’ve got to read up on the history of Assange. Plenty of corroborated accounts as to how he’s been extremely anti-establishment since his college years. I think he’s one of those guys who would love to see the world burn. But as a means to an end – peeling away the ridiculous corporate-owned fabrication passing for “free press” in the US these days – he’s fantastic.
December 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM #636524permabearParticipantNah, you’ve got to read up on the history of Assange. Plenty of corroborated accounts as to how he’s been extremely anti-establishment since his college years. I think he’s one of those guys who would love to see the world burn. But as a means to an end – peeling away the ridiculous corporate-owned fabrication passing for “free press” in the US these days – he’s fantastic.
December 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM #635423permabearParticipantNah, you’ve got to read up on the history of Assange. Plenty of corroborated accounts as to how he’s been extremely anti-establishment since his college years. I think he’s one of those guys who would love to see the world burn. But as a means to an end – peeling away the ridiculous corporate-owned fabrication passing for “free press” in the US these days – he’s fantastic.
December 4, 2010 at 2:03 PM #636559ArrayaParticipantHere’s one for ya kids. Seems that the State department is blocking a Congressio nal probe into how these documents got into the ‘wrong’ hands.
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/03/congressman-state-dept-blocking-probe-into-wikileaks-failures/”
December 4, 2010 at 2:03 PM #636110ArrayaParticipantHere’s one for ya kids. Seems that the State department is blocking a Congressio nal probe into how these documents got into the ‘wrong’ hands.
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/03/congressman-state-dept-blocking-probe-into-wikileaks-failures/”
December 4, 2010 at 2:03 PM #635533ArrayaParticipantHere’s one for ya kids. Seems that the State department is blocking a Congressio nal probe into how these documents got into the ‘wrong’ hands.
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/03/congressman-state-dept-blocking-probe-into-wikileaks-failures/”
December 4, 2010 at 2:03 PM #636241ArrayaParticipantHere’s one for ya kids. Seems that the State department is blocking a Congressio nal probe into how these documents got into the ‘wrong’ hands.
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/03/congressman-state-dept-blocking-probe-into-wikileaks-failures/”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.