The Tea Party downgrade

[SD Realtor]

Good no answer Brian. So label one of the parties obstructionists, because they presented something that didn’t align with your ideology. Especially when you could have dealt with the problems with yoru own party entirely in charge.

Yep, it is definitely absolutely always someone elses fault.

[briansd1]

SD Realtor, I’m not arguing that the Democrats did the right thing and worked on a timely basis.

On this thread I’m justifying the Tea Party downgrade moniker.

S&P watched the obstruction at work and they made their judgement.

If you lend money to a couple. But you know that wife and husband always bicker and that, for some petulant reason, one party will refuse to pay existing bills, then you will begin to question their willingness to pay bills already incurred.

[briansd1]

SD Realtor, I’m not arguing that the Democrats did the right thing and worked on a timely basis.

On this thread I’m justifying the Tea Party downgrade moniker.

S&P watched the obstruction at work and they made their judgement.

If you lend money to a couple. But you know that wife and husband always bicker and that, for some petulant reason, one party will refuse to pay existing bills, then you will begin to question their willingness to pay bills already incurred.

[briansd1]

SD Realtor, I’m not arguing that the Democrats did the right thing and worked on a timely basis.

On this thread I’m justifying the Tea Party downgrade moniker.

S&P watched the obstruction at work and they made their judgement.

If you lend money to a couple. But you know that wife and husband always bicker and that, for some petulant reason, one party will refuse to pay existing bills, then you will begin to question their willingness to pay bills already incurred.

[briansd1]

SD Realtor, I’m not arguing that the Democrats did the right thing and worked on a timely basis.

On this thread I’m justifying the Tea Party downgrade moniker.

S&P watched the obstruction at work and they made their judgement.

If you lend money to a couple. But you know that wife and husband always bicker and that, for some petulant reason, one party will refuse to pay existing bills, then you will begin to question their willingness to pay bills already incurred.

[briansd1]

SD Realtor, I’m not arguing that the Democrats did the right thing and worked on a timely basis.

On this thread I’m justifying the Tea Party downgrade moniker.

S&P watched the obstruction at work and they made their judgement.

If you lend money to a couple. But you know that wife and husband always bicker and that, for some petulant reason, one party will refuse to pay existing bills, then you will begin to question their willingness to pay bills already incurred.

[KIBU]

Basically the problem was using the threat of default of the country and hold hostage the country to gain political points, while disregarding the potential ramifications of their actions.

By the way, 1 trillion evaporated today in the stock:

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/08/markets/stock-market-loss/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=hp_bn3

As of now, the Nikkei is down 400 points.

I vaguely remembered someone warned us about all this but some probably thought it was and may still is just fiction.

[KIBU]

Basically the problem was using the threat of default of the country and hold hostage the country to gain political points, while disregarding the potential ramifications of their actions.

By the way, 1 trillion evaporated today in the stock:

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/08/markets/stock-market-loss/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=hp_bn3

As of now, the Nikkei is down 400 points.

I vaguely remembered someone warned us about all this but some probably thought it was and may still is just fiction.

[KIBU]

Basically the problem was using the threat of default of the country and hold hostage the country to gain political points, while disregarding the potential ramifications of their actions.

By the way, 1 trillion evaporated today in the stock:

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/08/markets/stock-market-loss/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=hp_bn3

As of now, the Nikkei is down 400 points.

I vaguely remembered someone warned us about all this but some probably thought it was and may still is just fiction.

[KIBU]

Basically the problem was using the threat of default of the country and hold hostage the country to gain political points, while disregarding the potential ramifications of their actions.

By the way, 1 trillion evaporated today in the stock:

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/08/markets/stock-market-loss/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=hp_bn3

As of now, the Nikkei is down 400 points.

I vaguely remembered someone warned us about all this but some probably thought it was and may still is just fiction.

[KIBU]

Basically the problem was using the threat of default of the country and hold hostage the country to gain political points, while disregarding the potential ramifications of their actions.

By the way, 1 trillion evaporated today in the stock:

http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/08/markets/stock-market-loss/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&hpt=hp_bn3

As of now, the Nikkei is down 400 points.

I vaguely remembered someone warned us about all this but some probably thought it was and may still is just fiction.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry but dissent is part of a democracy. Your husband and wife bickering example is simply a case of you saying the husband is always right and the wife is being an obstructionist.

Of course it also doesnt address the fact that the husband and wife used to have a supermajority and saw storm clouds on the horizon but chose to deal with the upcoming storm in the same way as all the previous husbands and wives… that is to not deal with them.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry but dissent is part of a democracy. Your husband and wife bickering example is simply a case of you saying the husband is always right and the wife is being an obstructionist.

Of course it also doesnt address the fact that the husband and wife used to have a supermajority and saw storm clouds on the horizon but chose to deal with the upcoming storm in the same way as all the previous husbands and wives… that is to not deal with them.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry but dissent is part of a democracy. Your husband and wife bickering example is simply a case of you saying the husband is always right and the wife is being an obstructionist.

Of course it also doesnt address the fact that the husband and wife used to have a supermajority and saw storm clouds on the horizon but chose to deal with the upcoming storm in the same way as all the previous husbands and wives… that is to not deal with them.

[SD Realtor]

Sorry but dissent is part of a democracy. Your husband and wife bickering example is simply a case of you saying the husband is always right and the wife is being an obstructionist.

Of course it also doesnt address the fact that the husband and wife used to have a supermajority and saw storm clouds on the horizon but chose to deal with the upcoming storm in the same way as all the previous husbands and wives… that is to not deal with them.

[Author]

Posts