Home › Forums › Housing › The sole goal of the freeze is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks a
- This topic has 35 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
farbet.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:19 PM #11147
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:21 PM #112529
farbet
ParticipantSavings and loan debacle round 2
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:45 PM #112550
4plexowner
ParticipantThe savings and loan bailout was petty cash compared to today’s crisis
There are at least $450 trillion dollars worth of derivatives floating around the planet right now – some portion of this paper mountain is currently shaking and bankers and politicians are running scared as a result
We are currently only hearing about the $20 trillion dollars worth of derivatives written on top of mortgage debt (MBS, CDOs, etc) – we don’t know if the fear being displayed by our ‘leaders’ is only caused by the $20 trillion or if they are reacting to something bigger that we aren’t aware of yet
All of the same financial games were played with derivatives written against auto loans and credit card debt and who knows what else – some analysts think we will start hearing about the collapse of derivatives based on auto loans and credit card debt very soon since late payments and defaults are increasing with both those categories of debt – perhaps we will have a freeze on credit card payments and a moratorium on auto repossessions in 2008?
Ultimately, this whole $450+ trillion mountain of derivatives will have to be marked down to some value that is much, much lower than today – 20 to 30 cents on the dollar seems to be the current value of an MBS – the next few years are certain to be interesting
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:45 PM #112665
4plexowner
ParticipantThe savings and loan bailout was petty cash compared to today’s crisis
There are at least $450 trillion dollars worth of derivatives floating around the planet right now – some portion of this paper mountain is currently shaking and bankers and politicians are running scared as a result
We are currently only hearing about the $20 trillion dollars worth of derivatives written on top of mortgage debt (MBS, CDOs, etc) – we don’t know if the fear being displayed by our ‘leaders’ is only caused by the $20 trillion or if they are reacting to something bigger that we aren’t aware of yet
All of the same financial games were played with derivatives written against auto loans and credit card debt and who knows what else – some analysts think we will start hearing about the collapse of derivatives based on auto loans and credit card debt very soon since late payments and defaults are increasing with both those categories of debt – perhaps we will have a freeze on credit card payments and a moratorium on auto repossessions in 2008?
Ultimately, this whole $450+ trillion mountain of derivatives will have to be marked down to some value that is much, much lower than today – 20 to 30 cents on the dollar seems to be the current value of an MBS – the next few years are certain to be interesting
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:45 PM #112705
4plexowner
ParticipantThe savings and loan bailout was petty cash compared to today’s crisis
There are at least $450 trillion dollars worth of derivatives floating around the planet right now – some portion of this paper mountain is currently shaking and bankers and politicians are running scared as a result
We are currently only hearing about the $20 trillion dollars worth of derivatives written on top of mortgage debt (MBS, CDOs, etc) – we don’t know if the fear being displayed by our ‘leaders’ is only caused by the $20 trillion or if they are reacting to something bigger that we aren’t aware of yet
All of the same financial games were played with derivatives written against auto loans and credit card debt and who knows what else – some analysts think we will start hearing about the collapse of derivatives based on auto loans and credit card debt very soon since late payments and defaults are increasing with both those categories of debt – perhaps we will have a freeze on credit card payments and a moratorium on auto repossessions in 2008?
Ultimately, this whole $450+ trillion mountain of derivatives will have to be marked down to some value that is much, much lower than today – 20 to 30 cents on the dollar seems to be the current value of an MBS – the next few years are certain to be interesting
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:45 PM #112714
4plexowner
ParticipantThe savings and loan bailout was petty cash compared to today’s crisis
There are at least $450 trillion dollars worth of derivatives floating around the planet right now – some portion of this paper mountain is currently shaking and bankers and politicians are running scared as a result
We are currently only hearing about the $20 trillion dollars worth of derivatives written on top of mortgage debt (MBS, CDOs, etc) – we don’t know if the fear being displayed by our ‘leaders’ is only caused by the $20 trillion or if they are reacting to something bigger that we aren’t aware of yet
All of the same financial games were played with derivatives written against auto loans and credit card debt and who knows what else – some analysts think we will start hearing about the collapse of derivatives based on auto loans and credit card debt very soon since late payments and defaults are increasing with both those categories of debt – perhaps we will have a freeze on credit card payments and a moratorium on auto repossessions in 2008?
Ultimately, this whole $450+ trillion mountain of derivatives will have to be marked down to some value that is much, much lower than today – 20 to 30 cents on the dollar seems to be the current value of an MBS – the next few years are certain to be interesting
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:45 PM #112748
4plexowner
ParticipantThe savings and loan bailout was petty cash compared to today’s crisis
There are at least $450 trillion dollars worth of derivatives floating around the planet right now – some portion of this paper mountain is currently shaking and bankers and politicians are running scared as a result
We are currently only hearing about the $20 trillion dollars worth of derivatives written on top of mortgage debt (MBS, CDOs, etc) – we don’t know if the fear being displayed by our ‘leaders’ is only caused by the $20 trillion or if they are reacting to something bigger that we aren’t aware of yet
All of the same financial games were played with derivatives written against auto loans and credit card debt and who knows what else – some analysts think we will start hearing about the collapse of derivatives based on auto loans and credit card debt very soon since late payments and defaults are increasing with both those categories of debt – perhaps we will have a freeze on credit card payments and a moratorium on auto repossessions in 2008?
Ultimately, this whole $450+ trillion mountain of derivatives will have to be marked down to some value that is much, much lower than today – 20 to 30 cents on the dollar seems to be the current value of an MBS – the next few years are certain to be interesting
-
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:21 PM #112646
farbet
ParticipantSavings and loan debacle round 2
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:21 PM #112687
farbet
ParticipantSavings and loan debacle round 2
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:21 PM #112694
farbet
ParticipantSavings and loan debacle round 2
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:21 PM #112728
farbet
ParticipantSavings and loan debacle round 2
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:44 PM #112540
farbet
Participantfamous quotes from the press today
“Right now I think it takes a brave soul to buy a home because there’s so much chatter about housing prices dropping,” Toll said
The government-led initiative may “reduce the severity of the decline,” said Robert Shiller, chief economist at MacroMarkets LLC and a professor at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Still, “if past cycles are a guide, we could have weak or declining markets for five to 10 years,” Shiller said.
It’ll be the biggest housing recession we’ve known,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at New York-based Decision Economics Inc. “Even if we figure this part of it out, we are not through it.”
“At best, it may stop some of the hemorrhaging of the housing market, but it doesn’t necessarily turn things around,” said Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The fundamental problem with housing is oversupply
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:51 PM #112560
farbet
ParticipantIn Economics 101 students learn that markets are driven by demand and not supply. The Bush/Paulson plan addresses supply and assuming that the plan gets off the ground it will only address supply at the margin. This is not anyone’s fault. The pill that is required to fix the housing market will have to be swallowed in parts over time. The market is not willing to admit at this point how severe the problems are.
Back to demand. The demand for housing is broken up into parts:
1. subprime demand, once estimated to be about 20% of the market, basically no longer exists. They can’t get the financing.
2. The Alt. A group may also want to buy a home, but they can no longer obtain financing.
3. There are a few investors, but they have to have their own sources of financing.
4. That leaves only the prime borrower, defined as someone with the credit history, income, and down payment necessary to get a mortgage that can be sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (agency paper in the language of the “biz”).
These people fall into two groups: a) those that are will buy a home at or near current market prices. This is where most of the housing demand is coming from at this point. I call this group the “oblivious” group, because they are oblivious to the current market conditions and just want a home. People have a variety of legitimate reasons for buying a home, but in these times a “romantic” notion of home ownership based on thinking of the early and mid 20th century just may be obsolete.
The second group of prime buyers b) is very cognizant of the market conditions and are sitting on the sidelines waiting for the price of homes to fall more. My guess is, this second group of prime buyers is slowly growing larger at the expense of the “oblivious” group.
With all that said the housing market goes no where until demand increases. Demand will not increase until the price of existing homes decreases (forget new homes it is only 15% of the housing market) and the second group of buyers believes that we have hit the bottom. They will not believe that we have hit bottom until the housing inventory number starts to decline. If you will notice there are no comments about interest rates, they are not material.
Implodemeter 12/09/07-
December 9, 2007 at 7:58 PM #112571
farbet
ParticipantOblivious Group or Cognizant Group??
I presume everyone here belongs to Group 2 -
December 9, 2007 at 8:17 PM #112586
4plexowner
ParticipantJim Sinclair (www.jsmineset.com) is highlighting the ‘Real Story is Fraud’ article tonight – I like Jim’s commentary and consider his advice on gold excellent – several people post on his site and provide excellent charts and commentary – look for Dan Norcini (charts and commentary – Dan is an active gold trader) and Monty Guild (global economic commentary)
Jim is also linking to these articles tonight:
Auto loan delinquency rises, another sign of stretched consumer
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/auto-loan-delinquency-rises-another-sign-of-stretched-consumer/JPMorgan favors precious metals in 2008
http://sg.biz.yahoo.com/071207/3/4d825.htmlOil Min: Iran Has Halted Oil Transactions In Dollars
“… labeling the greenback an “unreliable” currency…”
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20071208%5cACQDJON200712080440DOWJONESDJONLINE000007.htm -
December 9, 2007 at 8:22 PM #112592
farbet
Participant4plexowner,great site. Thanks
-
December 9, 2007 at 8:22 PM #112706
farbet
Participant4plexowner,great site. Thanks
-
December 9, 2007 at 8:22 PM #112745
farbet
Participant4plexowner,great site. Thanks
-
December 9, 2007 at 8:22 PM #112754
farbet
Participant4plexowner,great site. Thanks
-
December 9, 2007 at 8:22 PM #112788
farbet
Participant4plexowner,great site. Thanks
-
December 9, 2007 at 8:17 PM #112701
4plexowner
ParticipantJim Sinclair (www.jsmineset.com) is highlighting the ‘Real Story is Fraud’ article tonight – I like Jim’s commentary and consider his advice on gold excellent – several people post on his site and provide excellent charts and commentary – look for Dan Norcini (charts and commentary – Dan is an active gold trader) and Monty Guild (global economic commentary)
Jim is also linking to these articles tonight:
Auto loan delinquency rises, another sign of stretched consumer
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/auto-loan-delinquency-rises-another-sign-of-stretched-consumer/JPMorgan favors precious metals in 2008
http://sg.biz.yahoo.com/071207/3/4d825.htmlOil Min: Iran Has Halted Oil Transactions In Dollars
“… labeling the greenback an “unreliable” currency…”
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20071208%5cACQDJON200712080440DOWJONESDJONLINE000007.htm -
December 9, 2007 at 8:17 PM #112740
4plexowner
ParticipantJim Sinclair (www.jsmineset.com) is highlighting the ‘Real Story is Fraud’ article tonight – I like Jim’s commentary and consider his advice on gold excellent – several people post on his site and provide excellent charts and commentary – look for Dan Norcini (charts and commentary – Dan is an active gold trader) and Monty Guild (global economic commentary)
Jim is also linking to these articles tonight:
Auto loan delinquency rises, another sign of stretched consumer
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/auto-loan-delinquency-rises-another-sign-of-stretched-consumer/JPMorgan favors precious metals in 2008
http://sg.biz.yahoo.com/071207/3/4d825.htmlOil Min: Iran Has Halted Oil Transactions In Dollars
“… labeling the greenback an “unreliable” currency…”
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20071208%5cACQDJON200712080440DOWJONESDJONLINE000007.htm -
December 9, 2007 at 8:17 PM #112749
4plexowner
ParticipantJim Sinclair (www.jsmineset.com) is highlighting the ‘Real Story is Fraud’ article tonight – I like Jim’s commentary and consider his advice on gold excellent – several people post on his site and provide excellent charts and commentary – look for Dan Norcini (charts and commentary – Dan is an active gold trader) and Monty Guild (global economic commentary)
Jim is also linking to these articles tonight:
Auto loan delinquency rises, another sign of stretched consumer
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/auto-loan-delinquency-rises-another-sign-of-stretched-consumer/JPMorgan favors precious metals in 2008
http://sg.biz.yahoo.com/071207/3/4d825.htmlOil Min: Iran Has Halted Oil Transactions In Dollars
“… labeling the greenback an “unreliable” currency…”
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20071208%5cACQDJON200712080440DOWJONESDJONLINE000007.htm -
December 9, 2007 at 8:17 PM #112783
4plexowner
ParticipantJim Sinclair (www.jsmineset.com) is highlighting the ‘Real Story is Fraud’ article tonight – I like Jim’s commentary and consider his advice on gold excellent – several people post on his site and provide excellent charts and commentary – look for Dan Norcini (charts and commentary – Dan is an active gold trader) and Monty Guild (global economic commentary)
Jim is also linking to these articles tonight:
Auto loan delinquency rises, another sign of stretched consumer
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/auto-loan-delinquency-rises-another-sign-of-stretched-consumer/JPMorgan favors precious metals in 2008
http://sg.biz.yahoo.com/071207/3/4d825.htmlOil Min: Iran Has Halted Oil Transactions In Dollars
“… labeling the greenback an “unreliable” currency…”
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20071208%5cACQDJON200712080440DOWJONESDJONLINE000007.htm -
December 9, 2007 at 7:58 PM #112685
farbet
ParticipantOblivious Group or Cognizant Group??
I presume everyone here belongs to Group 2 -
December 9, 2007 at 7:58 PM #112725
farbet
ParticipantOblivious Group or Cognizant Group??
I presume everyone here belongs to Group 2 -
December 9, 2007 at 7:58 PM #112734
farbet
ParticipantOblivious Group or Cognizant Group??
I presume everyone here belongs to Group 2 -
December 9, 2007 at 7:58 PM #112768
farbet
ParticipantOblivious Group or Cognizant Group??
I presume everyone here belongs to Group 2
-
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:51 PM #112677
farbet
ParticipantIn Economics 101 students learn that markets are driven by demand and not supply. The Bush/Paulson plan addresses supply and assuming that the plan gets off the ground it will only address supply at the margin. This is not anyone’s fault. The pill that is required to fix the housing market will have to be swallowed in parts over time. The market is not willing to admit at this point how severe the problems are.
Back to demand. The demand for housing is broken up into parts:
1. subprime demand, once estimated to be about 20% of the market, basically no longer exists. They can’t get the financing.
2. The Alt. A group may also want to buy a home, but they can no longer obtain financing.
3. There are a few investors, but they have to have their own sources of financing.
4. That leaves only the prime borrower, defined as someone with the credit history, income, and down payment necessary to get a mortgage that can be sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (agency paper in the language of the “biz”).
These people fall into two groups: a) those that are will buy a home at or near current market prices. This is where most of the housing demand is coming from at this point. I call this group the “oblivious” group, because they are oblivious to the current market conditions and just want a home. People have a variety of legitimate reasons for buying a home, but in these times a “romantic” notion of home ownership based on thinking of the early and mid 20th century just may be obsolete.
The second group of prime buyers b) is very cognizant of the market conditions and are sitting on the sidelines waiting for the price of homes to fall more. My guess is, this second group of prime buyers is slowly growing larger at the expense of the “oblivious” group.
With all that said the housing market goes no where until demand increases. Demand will not increase until the price of existing homes decreases (forget new homes it is only 15% of the housing market) and the second group of buyers believes that we have hit the bottom. They will not believe that we have hit bottom until the housing inventory number starts to decline. If you will notice there are no comments about interest rates, they are not material.
Implodemeter 12/09/07 -
December 9, 2007 at 7:51 PM #112715
farbet
ParticipantIn Economics 101 students learn that markets are driven by demand and not supply. The Bush/Paulson plan addresses supply and assuming that the plan gets off the ground it will only address supply at the margin. This is not anyone’s fault. The pill that is required to fix the housing market will have to be swallowed in parts over time. The market is not willing to admit at this point how severe the problems are.
Back to demand. The demand for housing is broken up into parts:
1. subprime demand, once estimated to be about 20% of the market, basically no longer exists. They can’t get the financing.
2. The Alt. A group may also want to buy a home, but they can no longer obtain financing.
3. There are a few investors, but they have to have their own sources of financing.
4. That leaves only the prime borrower, defined as someone with the credit history, income, and down payment necessary to get a mortgage that can be sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (agency paper in the language of the “biz”).
These people fall into two groups: a) those that are will buy a home at or near current market prices. This is where most of the housing demand is coming from at this point. I call this group the “oblivious” group, because they are oblivious to the current market conditions and just want a home. People have a variety of legitimate reasons for buying a home, but in these times a “romantic” notion of home ownership based on thinking of the early and mid 20th century just may be obsolete.
The second group of prime buyers b) is very cognizant of the market conditions and are sitting on the sidelines waiting for the price of homes to fall more. My guess is, this second group of prime buyers is slowly growing larger at the expense of the “oblivious” group.
With all that said the housing market goes no where until demand increases. Demand will not increase until the price of existing homes decreases (forget new homes it is only 15% of the housing market) and the second group of buyers believes that we have hit the bottom. They will not believe that we have hit bottom until the housing inventory number starts to decline. If you will notice there are no comments about interest rates, they are not material.
Implodemeter 12/09/07 -
December 9, 2007 at 7:51 PM #112724
farbet
ParticipantIn Economics 101 students learn that markets are driven by demand and not supply. The Bush/Paulson plan addresses supply and assuming that the plan gets off the ground it will only address supply at the margin. This is not anyone’s fault. The pill that is required to fix the housing market will have to be swallowed in parts over time. The market is not willing to admit at this point how severe the problems are.
Back to demand. The demand for housing is broken up into parts:
1. subprime demand, once estimated to be about 20% of the market, basically no longer exists. They can’t get the financing.
2. The Alt. A group may also want to buy a home, but they can no longer obtain financing.
3. There are a few investors, but they have to have their own sources of financing.
4. That leaves only the prime borrower, defined as someone with the credit history, income, and down payment necessary to get a mortgage that can be sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (agency paper in the language of the “biz”).
These people fall into two groups: a) those that are will buy a home at or near current market prices. This is where most of the housing demand is coming from at this point. I call this group the “oblivious” group, because they are oblivious to the current market conditions and just want a home. People have a variety of legitimate reasons for buying a home, but in these times a “romantic” notion of home ownership based on thinking of the early and mid 20th century just may be obsolete.
The second group of prime buyers b) is very cognizant of the market conditions and are sitting on the sidelines waiting for the price of homes to fall more. My guess is, this second group of prime buyers is slowly growing larger at the expense of the “oblivious” group.
With all that said the housing market goes no where until demand increases. Demand will not increase until the price of existing homes decreases (forget new homes it is only 15% of the housing market) and the second group of buyers believes that we have hit the bottom. They will not believe that we have hit bottom until the housing inventory number starts to decline. If you will notice there are no comments about interest rates, they are not material.
Implodemeter 12/09/07 -
December 9, 2007 at 7:51 PM #112758
farbet
ParticipantIn Economics 101 students learn that markets are driven by demand and not supply. The Bush/Paulson plan addresses supply and assuming that the plan gets off the ground it will only address supply at the margin. This is not anyone’s fault. The pill that is required to fix the housing market will have to be swallowed in parts over time. The market is not willing to admit at this point how severe the problems are.
Back to demand. The demand for housing is broken up into parts:
1. subprime demand, once estimated to be about 20% of the market, basically no longer exists. They can’t get the financing.
2. The Alt. A group may also want to buy a home, but they can no longer obtain financing.
3. There are a few investors, but they have to have their own sources of financing.
4. That leaves only the prime borrower, defined as someone with the credit history, income, and down payment necessary to get a mortgage that can be sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (agency paper in the language of the “biz”).
These people fall into two groups: a) those that are will buy a home at or near current market prices. This is where most of the housing demand is coming from at this point. I call this group the “oblivious” group, because they are oblivious to the current market conditions and just want a home. People have a variety of legitimate reasons for buying a home, but in these times a “romantic” notion of home ownership based on thinking of the early and mid 20th century just may be obsolete.
The second group of prime buyers b) is very cognizant of the market conditions and are sitting on the sidelines waiting for the price of homes to fall more. My guess is, this second group of prime buyers is slowly growing larger at the expense of the “oblivious” group.
With all that said the housing market goes no where until demand increases. Demand will not increase until the price of existing homes decreases (forget new homes it is only 15% of the housing market) and the second group of buyers believes that we have hit the bottom. They will not believe that we have hit bottom until the housing inventory number starts to decline. If you will notice there are no comments about interest rates, they are not material.
Implodemeter 12/09/07
-
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:44 PM #112655
farbet
Participantfamous quotes from the press today
“Right now I think it takes a brave soul to buy a home because there’s so much chatter about housing prices dropping,” Toll said
The government-led initiative may “reduce the severity of the decline,” said Robert Shiller, chief economist at MacroMarkets LLC and a professor at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Still, “if past cycles are a guide, we could have weak or declining markets for five to 10 years,” Shiller said.
It’ll be the biggest housing recession we’ve known,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at New York-based Decision Economics Inc. “Even if we figure this part of it out, we are not through it.”
“At best, it may stop some of the hemorrhaging of the housing market, but it doesn’t necessarily turn things around,” said Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The fundamental problem with housing is oversupply
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:44 PM #112697
farbet
Participantfamous quotes from the press today
“Right now I think it takes a brave soul to buy a home because there’s so much chatter about housing prices dropping,” Toll said
The government-led initiative may “reduce the severity of the decline,” said Robert Shiller, chief economist at MacroMarkets LLC and a professor at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Still, “if past cycles are a guide, we could have weak or declining markets for five to 10 years,” Shiller said.
It’ll be the biggest housing recession we’ve known,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at New York-based Decision Economics Inc. “Even if we figure this part of it out, we are not through it.”
“At best, it may stop some of the hemorrhaging of the housing market, but it doesn’t necessarily turn things around,” said Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The fundamental problem with housing is oversupply
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:44 PM #112704
farbet
Participantfamous quotes from the press today
“Right now I think it takes a brave soul to buy a home because there’s so much chatter about housing prices dropping,” Toll said
The government-led initiative may “reduce the severity of the decline,” said Robert Shiller, chief economist at MacroMarkets LLC and a professor at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Still, “if past cycles are a guide, we could have weak or declining markets for five to 10 years,” Shiller said.
It’ll be the biggest housing recession we’ve known,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at New York-based Decision Economics Inc. “Even if we figure this part of it out, we are not through it.”
“At best, it may stop some of the hemorrhaging of the housing market, but it doesn’t necessarily turn things around,” said Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The fundamental problem with housing is oversupply
-
December 9, 2007 at 7:44 PM #112738
farbet
Participantfamous quotes from the press today
“Right now I think it takes a brave soul to buy a home because there’s so much chatter about housing prices dropping,” Toll said
The government-led initiative may “reduce the severity of the decline,” said Robert Shiller, chief economist at MacroMarkets LLC and a professor at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Still, “if past cycles are a guide, we could have weak or declining markets for five to 10 years,” Shiller said.
It’ll be the biggest housing recession we’ve known,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at New York-based Decision Economics Inc. “Even if we figure this part of it out, we are not through it.”
“At best, it may stop some of the hemorrhaging of the housing market, but it doesn’t necessarily turn things around,” said Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The fundamental problem with housing is oversupply
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.