Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › The new law – And should we walk now.
- This topic has 12 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
no_such_reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 19, 2012 at 9:11 AM #19521February 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM #738316
sdrealtor
ParticipantHere is an idea. Stop paying the 2nd and keep current on the first. After 6months or so it should end up with a collection agency. Negotiate with them and you should have no problem settling for 5 to 10k. Then you only owe 400k. How would that change your decision?
February 19, 2012 at 10:38 AM #738320briansd1
GuestGood idea, sdrealtor. Makes sense to me.
geovil7, yes, you have to consider all the practical options, including walking.
geovil7 is clearly not hurting financially…. but being underwater makes him feel that he’s being screwed somehow and want to get out of the situation.
A lot of psychology at play here…. so that’s why I continue to believe that underwater houses will have to resolved before the market gets back to “normal.”
Government intervention will smoothen and elongate the process, but negative equity is causing people to fall out of love with their houses.
February 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM #738321briansd1
Guest[quote=geovil7] Slap on a 3rd bedroom and bathroom for $50k, recover some equity in the property, considering the 3+2 comps in our neighborhood, [/quote]
Can you really add a bed and bath for that cheap, with permits, plans, construction and all?
Just curious if you got quotes already.
February 19, 2012 at 1:57 PM #738324geovil7
ParticipantThanks SDR. That is something we hadn’t considered. Both our 1st and 2nd are now being administered by same bank we bought from (although they sold them to Fannie) and are from initial purchase. I wonder if that would affect how they would handle such a negotiation?
Any further ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
February 19, 2012 at 9:13 PM #738335paramount
ParticipantWalk now while you still can. Seriously.
Well, I take that back.
1st ask for a principal reduction, which you will probably not get. By doing that 1st you can at least say you tried.
When that fails as it likely will, then walk.
With a clear conscience knowing that you tried to do the sensible thing, but your efforts were in vain.
According to Nicole Foss, credit won’t be around much longer anyway, so don’t worry to much about your credit score.
Do what makes business sense for you and your family.
February 20, 2012 at 3:14 AM #738345Coronita
Participant#2 and #3 are both bad ideas.
#2 is bad… Why would you want to pay $800/month for someone else to live there, and for a property that is that underwater and would take forever (if ever) to re-appreciate back to your purchase price? Lose/lose scenario.
#3 the worst decision. Because not only would you be paying $400/month for someone else to live there, you’re also going to spend $50k(which i think it would cost a lot more), for someone to live there.
February 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM #738346Coronita
Participant[quote=briansd1]Good idea, sdrealtor. Makes sense to me.
geovil7, yes, you have to consider all the practical options, including walking.
geovil7 is clearly not hurting financially…. but being underwater makes him feel that he’s being screwed somehow and want to get out of the situation.
A lot of psychology at play here…. so that’s why I continue to believe that underwater houses will have to resolved before the market gets back to “normal.”
Government intervention will smoothen and elongate the process, but negative equity is causing people to fall out of love with their houses.[/quote]
Read the part about job in different area, bigger family, 80% I/O and 10% balloon payment in 2017….Unless he can make the balloon payment on 5 years, he certainly most likely is not going to be able to refinance when time comes. And hopefully in 5 years we still have low interest, otherwise his monthly is go up now too..So what might be affordable now might not be moving forward.
February 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM #738348Kingside
Participant[quote=geovil7]
With the new law, we’re told that we’re going to be dinged with a 1099 for a short sale or foreclosure after 12/31/12, so if we’re going to walk, we have to stop paying or organize a short sale soon.[/quote]
There is a lot of misinformation out there about the 2007 Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act that is scheduled to expire at the end of this year. Some folks assume that they have to act to get relief before the act expires when they really don’t need to, and some folks assume they will get relief under the act when they won’t qualify. Certain parts of the real estate industry assume it applies to everyone when it does not.
For instance, cancellation of true non-recourse debt may be exempt from taxation without having to resort to the act at all. Cash out refinances where the cash was used for purposes other than improvement of the property may be a situation where little help will be provided by the act.
Start by reviewing IRS publication 4681:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p4681.pdf
and consult a knowledgeable tax professional. Don’t rely on what someone tells you about the act if they are not a tax professional.
February 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM #738349sdrealtor
ParticipantSince you have a conventional Fannie Mae 1st you may be able to refi that with the HARP program that is rolling out. If you can you would have to look at what that did to your payment. The you could look into stripping your second out. You need to investigate all options and do want to check with a tax/legal advisor as advised by Kingside.
February 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM #738351sdrealtor
ParticipantFebruary 20, 2012 at 7:13 PM #738363GH
ParticipantThe credit industry has us all running around holding our basket of credit score eggs. One trip or slip…
There is obviously a LOT of thinking that needs to go into a decision like this, but if you are likely to default in the near term or intermediate term obviously you do not want to end up being 1099’d.
That said there are a LOT of circumstances such as being insolvent which may make the issue moot.
Sounds like you REALLY need to dig in and get all the information.
February 21, 2012 at 12:31 PM #738401no_such_reality
ParticipantI like SDR’s idea. It wreck your credit but you likely need to play hardball. The suggestion to read on harp is also good.
One point of clarification, Are the loans purchase money loans or refi?
If purchase money, if you can qualify another option is to buy the new place an then walk. Verify your tax consequences.
That’s provided you can sell and cover the loss.
But I wouldn’t wreck myself paying a DOA loan
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.