- This topic has 220 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2008 at 2:48 PM #248086July 27, 2008 at 4:19 PM #247873sdnativesonParticipant
with a nod to flu
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.monty.hall.htmlJuly 27, 2008 at 4:19 PM #248029sdnativesonParticipantwith a nod to flu
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.monty.hall.htmlJuly 27, 2008 at 4:19 PM #248032sdnativesonParticipantwith a nod to flu
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.monty.hall.htmlJuly 27, 2008 at 4:19 PM #248094sdnativesonParticipantwith a nod to flu
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.monty.hall.htmlJuly 27, 2008 at 4:19 PM #248098sdnativesonParticipantwith a nod to flu
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.monty.hall.htmlJuly 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM #247898nostradamusParticipant21 was the lamest movie ever. Get a big name star, throw in some people, make a crappy film and market it like it’s tha shiznit… That should be the description on the cover of this movie. Or “amateurs’ first try to make a movie, somehow get Kevin Spacey to star”.
July 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM #248052nostradamusParticipant21 was the lamest movie ever. Get a big name star, throw in some people, make a crappy film and market it like it’s tha shiznit… That should be the description on the cover of this movie. Or “amateurs’ first try to make a movie, somehow get Kevin Spacey to star”.
July 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM #248058nostradamusParticipant21 was the lamest movie ever. Get a big name star, throw in some people, make a crappy film and market it like it’s tha shiznit… That should be the description on the cover of this movie. Or “amateurs’ first try to make a movie, somehow get Kevin Spacey to star”.
July 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM #248119nostradamusParticipant21 was the lamest movie ever. Get a big name star, throw in some people, make a crappy film and market it like it’s tha shiznit… That should be the description on the cover of this movie. Or “amateurs’ first try to make a movie, somehow get Kevin Spacey to star”.
July 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM #248123nostradamusParticipant21 was the lamest movie ever. Get a big name star, throw in some people, make a crappy film and market it like it’s tha shiznit… That should be the description on the cover of this movie. Or “amateurs’ first try to make a movie, somehow get Kevin Spacey to star”.
July 27, 2008 at 6:05 PM #247908CoronitaParticipant[quote]I don’t know why some of you people are arguing against the 2/3 answer. It IS the correct answer, whether you understand the logic or not.
People who study probabilities for a living have said this is the answer. All you amateur naysayers should just capitulate and move on…:-)
[/quote]LOL…I chuckle a bit here, because I had the same feeling.But, thankfully, a lot of you aren’t responsible for engineering things we depend on. Just kidding.
Anyway, don’t mean anything by it. Take a probability class, and then take a stochastic processes class. Much of this is required especially for information theory and communication systems. I guess it’s also applicable to finance, but I don’t know much about that subject.
July 27, 2008 at 6:05 PM #248062CoronitaParticipant[quote]I don’t know why some of you people are arguing against the 2/3 answer. It IS the correct answer, whether you understand the logic or not.
People who study probabilities for a living have said this is the answer. All you amateur naysayers should just capitulate and move on…:-)
[/quote]LOL…I chuckle a bit here, because I had the same feeling.But, thankfully, a lot of you aren’t responsible for engineering things we depend on. Just kidding.
Anyway, don’t mean anything by it. Take a probability class, and then take a stochastic processes class. Much of this is required especially for information theory and communication systems. I guess it’s also applicable to finance, but I don’t know much about that subject.
July 27, 2008 at 6:05 PM #248068CoronitaParticipant[quote]I don’t know why some of you people are arguing against the 2/3 answer. It IS the correct answer, whether you understand the logic or not.
People who study probabilities for a living have said this is the answer. All you amateur naysayers should just capitulate and move on…:-)
[/quote]LOL…I chuckle a bit here, because I had the same feeling.But, thankfully, a lot of you aren’t responsible for engineering things we depend on. Just kidding.
Anyway, don’t mean anything by it. Take a probability class, and then take a stochastic processes class. Much of this is required especially for information theory and communication systems. I guess it’s also applicable to finance, but I don’t know much about that subject.
July 27, 2008 at 6:05 PM #248128CoronitaParticipant[quote]I don’t know why some of you people are arguing against the 2/3 answer. It IS the correct answer, whether you understand the logic or not.
People who study probabilities for a living have said this is the answer. All you amateur naysayers should just capitulate and move on…:-)
[/quote]LOL…I chuckle a bit here, because I had the same feeling.But, thankfully, a lot of you aren’t responsible for engineering things we depend on. Just kidding.
Anyway, don’t mean anything by it. Take a probability class, and then take a stochastic processes class. Much of this is required especially for information theory and communication systems. I guess it’s also applicable to finance, but I don’t know much about that subject.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.