- This topic has 245 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2008 at 5:46 PM #169438March 13, 2008 at 5:49 PM #169007
Diego Mamani
ParticipantIf your income stays the same and there is 50% inflation over the next 3 years do you think that 500k house today is going to be more affordable in 3 yrs? I don’t think so!!!
Kev, I don’t think so either! That’s one big IF you wrote. The point I’m making is precisely that nominal incomes will start going up sooner or later. Our friend bsrsharma appears to be one of the few who got my argument.
March 13, 2008 at 5:49 PM #169337Diego Mamani
ParticipantIf your income stays the same and there is 50% inflation over the next 3 years do you think that 500k house today is going to be more affordable in 3 yrs? I don’t think so!!!
Kev, I don’t think so either! That’s one big IF you wrote. The point I’m making is precisely that nominal incomes will start going up sooner or later. Our friend bsrsharma appears to be one of the few who got my argument.
March 13, 2008 at 5:49 PM #169341Diego Mamani
ParticipantIf your income stays the same and there is 50% inflation over the next 3 years do you think that 500k house today is going to be more affordable in 3 yrs? I don’t think so!!!
Kev, I don’t think so either! That’s one big IF you wrote. The point I’m making is precisely that nominal incomes will start going up sooner or later. Our friend bsrsharma appears to be one of the few who got my argument.
March 13, 2008 at 5:49 PM #169365Diego Mamani
ParticipantIf your income stays the same and there is 50% inflation over the next 3 years do you think that 500k house today is going to be more affordable in 3 yrs? I don’t think so!!!
Kev, I don’t think so either! That’s one big IF you wrote. The point I’m making is precisely that nominal incomes will start going up sooner or later. Our friend bsrsharma appears to be one of the few who got my argument.
March 13, 2008 at 5:49 PM #169443Diego Mamani
ParticipantIf your income stays the same and there is 50% inflation over the next 3 years do you think that 500k house today is going to be more affordable in 3 yrs? I don’t think so!!!
Kev, I don’t think so either! That’s one big IF you wrote. The point I’m making is precisely that nominal incomes will start going up sooner or later. Our friend bsrsharma appears to be one of the few who got my argument.
March 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM #169043kewp
ParticipantI wish I had the reference, but I saw recently that the median income is actually *down* since 2000. And thats the fundamental re: housing prices.
High inflation is ultimately going to make the housing crash worse. People will be so strapped for cash due to high energy and food prices that aren’t going to be able to afford to pay a premium for housing. And believe me, folks will rent long before they go cold and hungry!
High energy costs are also going to make those McMansions out in the IE even less attractive, as the commuting and heating/cooling costs will be significantly more.
March 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM #169372kewp
ParticipantI wish I had the reference, but I saw recently that the median income is actually *down* since 2000. And thats the fundamental re: housing prices.
High inflation is ultimately going to make the housing crash worse. People will be so strapped for cash due to high energy and food prices that aren’t going to be able to afford to pay a premium for housing. And believe me, folks will rent long before they go cold and hungry!
High energy costs are also going to make those McMansions out in the IE even less attractive, as the commuting and heating/cooling costs will be significantly more.
March 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM #169378kewp
ParticipantI wish I had the reference, but I saw recently that the median income is actually *down* since 2000. And thats the fundamental re: housing prices.
High inflation is ultimately going to make the housing crash worse. People will be so strapped for cash due to high energy and food prices that aren’t going to be able to afford to pay a premium for housing. And believe me, folks will rent long before they go cold and hungry!
High energy costs are also going to make those McMansions out in the IE even less attractive, as the commuting and heating/cooling costs will be significantly more.
March 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM #169400kewp
ParticipantI wish I had the reference, but I saw recently that the median income is actually *down* since 2000. And thats the fundamental re: housing prices.
High inflation is ultimately going to make the housing crash worse. People will be so strapped for cash due to high energy and food prices that aren’t going to be able to afford to pay a premium for housing. And believe me, folks will rent long before they go cold and hungry!
High energy costs are also going to make those McMansions out in the IE even less attractive, as the commuting and heating/cooling costs will be significantly more.
March 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM #169479kewp
ParticipantI wish I had the reference, but I saw recently that the median income is actually *down* since 2000. And thats the fundamental re: housing prices.
High inflation is ultimately going to make the housing crash worse. People will be so strapped for cash due to high energy and food prices that aren’t going to be able to afford to pay a premium for housing. And believe me, folks will rent long before they go cold and hungry!
High energy costs are also going to make those McMansions out in the IE even less attractive, as the commuting and heating/cooling costs will be significantly more.
March 13, 2008 at 9:28 PM #169092equalizer
Participantbsrsharma is right when stating "One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. "
That’s what most level-headed economists like peter navarro are saying, even if they disagree with the policy. Peter stated in Feb 2003 that war was going to stimulate the economy and turned bullish on stocks then.
The bears will enjoy his site: http://www.peternavarro.com/dailyblog.html
March 13, 2008 at 9:28 PM #169424equalizer
Participantbsrsharma is right when stating "One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. "
That’s what most level-headed economists like peter navarro are saying, even if they disagree with the policy. Peter stated in Feb 2003 that war was going to stimulate the economy and turned bullish on stocks then.
The bears will enjoy his site: http://www.peternavarro.com/dailyblog.html
March 13, 2008 at 9:28 PM #169427equalizer
Participantbsrsharma is right when stating "One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. "
That’s what most level-headed economists like peter navarro are saying, even if they disagree with the policy. Peter stated in Feb 2003 that war was going to stimulate the economy and turned bullish on stocks then.
The bears will enjoy his site: http://www.peternavarro.com/dailyblog.html
March 13, 2008 at 9:28 PM #169450equalizer
Participantbsrsharma is right when stating "One way the Fed is helping to solve our severe indebtedness is through inflation. By successively shrinking the value of US $, we actually have to pay less in real value to our Creditors, both public and private. Since most of the Debtors are American and Creditors are Foreign, this is politically very attractive. "
That’s what most level-headed economists like peter navarro are saying, even if they disagree with the policy. Peter stated in Feb 2003 that war was going to stimulate the economy and turned bullish on stocks then.
The bears will enjoy his site: http://www.peternavarro.com/dailyblog.html
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.