- This topic has 405 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 26, 2010 at 11:19 PM #583990July 27, 2010 at 12:12 AM #582972
gandalf
ParticipantPoints about regulations are well-taken. Much of it is in need of reform.
Something in the financial reform bill that caught my attention involves attempts to change the relationship between rating agencies and the banks. Current practice, rating agencies are paid by the banks to rate their products, so there’s an inherent conflict of interest. Changing this would be an example of fixing financial regulations — and good governance.
July 27, 2010 at 12:12 AM #583064gandalf
ParticipantPoints about regulations are well-taken. Much of it is in need of reform.
Something in the financial reform bill that caught my attention involves attempts to change the relationship between rating agencies and the banks. Current practice, rating agencies are paid by the banks to rate their products, so there’s an inherent conflict of interest. Changing this would be an example of fixing financial regulations — and good governance.
July 27, 2010 at 12:12 AM #583599gandalf
ParticipantPoints about regulations are well-taken. Much of it is in need of reform.
Something in the financial reform bill that caught my attention involves attempts to change the relationship between rating agencies and the banks. Current practice, rating agencies are paid by the banks to rate their products, so there’s an inherent conflict of interest. Changing this would be an example of fixing financial regulations — and good governance.
July 27, 2010 at 12:12 AM #583706gandalf
ParticipantPoints about regulations are well-taken. Much of it is in need of reform.
Something in the financial reform bill that caught my attention involves attempts to change the relationship between rating agencies and the banks. Current practice, rating agencies are paid by the banks to rate their products, so there’s an inherent conflict of interest. Changing this would be an example of fixing financial regulations — and good governance.
July 27, 2010 at 12:12 AM #584010gandalf
ParticipantPoints about regulations are well-taken. Much of it is in need of reform.
Something in the financial reform bill that caught my attention involves attempts to change the relationship between rating agencies and the banks. Current practice, rating agencies are paid by the banks to rate their products, so there’s an inherent conflict of interest. Changing this would be an example of fixing financial regulations — and good governance.
July 27, 2010 at 12:14 AM #582967gandalf
ParticipantGovernment is not the problem. Government had a PROPER ROLE in regulating the financial markets, as it did since the Great Depression. Dismantling of government regulation of the financial industry over the last 10-15 years is one of the principal enabling reasons for the economic meltdown that’s occurred.
Context matters here, Joe Homeowner is a minor part of the problem. Foreclosures in the ‘retail’ housing market are the tip of the iceberg. In the past 15 years or so, large banks and financial institutions ‘created’ and then lost enormous, titanic sums of money in risky, leveraged and often fraudulent financial dealings.
The amounts DWARF the total sum value of all of the housing stock in America. The sum total value of all of our houses is only about $20T. Conservative estimates put the amount of fraud in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. It dwarfs the entire annual U.S. GDP — every single dollar that changes hands in the US in the course of a year. That’s about 13 trillion per year.
These ‘Banksters’ took our money, then used it to place bogus, leveraged bets in a giant global financial casino, until the music stopped playing, at which point they LOST our money. That’s the fucking issue. That’s why there’s a public bailout, because Citi, Chase, Goldman and the others lost our money. They are at the center of the universe in terms of blame. Joe Homeowner is a drop in the bucket.
July 27, 2010 at 12:14 AM #583059gandalf
ParticipantGovernment is not the problem. Government had a PROPER ROLE in regulating the financial markets, as it did since the Great Depression. Dismantling of government regulation of the financial industry over the last 10-15 years is one of the principal enabling reasons for the economic meltdown that’s occurred.
Context matters here, Joe Homeowner is a minor part of the problem. Foreclosures in the ‘retail’ housing market are the tip of the iceberg. In the past 15 years or so, large banks and financial institutions ‘created’ and then lost enormous, titanic sums of money in risky, leveraged and often fraudulent financial dealings.
The amounts DWARF the total sum value of all of the housing stock in America. The sum total value of all of our houses is only about $20T. Conservative estimates put the amount of fraud in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. It dwarfs the entire annual U.S. GDP — every single dollar that changes hands in the US in the course of a year. That’s about 13 trillion per year.
These ‘Banksters’ took our money, then used it to place bogus, leveraged bets in a giant global financial casino, until the music stopped playing, at which point they LOST our money. That’s the fucking issue. That’s why there’s a public bailout, because Citi, Chase, Goldman and the others lost our money. They are at the center of the universe in terms of blame. Joe Homeowner is a drop in the bucket.
July 27, 2010 at 12:14 AM #583594gandalf
ParticipantGovernment is not the problem. Government had a PROPER ROLE in regulating the financial markets, as it did since the Great Depression. Dismantling of government regulation of the financial industry over the last 10-15 years is one of the principal enabling reasons for the economic meltdown that’s occurred.
Context matters here, Joe Homeowner is a minor part of the problem. Foreclosures in the ‘retail’ housing market are the tip of the iceberg. In the past 15 years or so, large banks and financial institutions ‘created’ and then lost enormous, titanic sums of money in risky, leveraged and often fraudulent financial dealings.
The amounts DWARF the total sum value of all of the housing stock in America. The sum total value of all of our houses is only about $20T. Conservative estimates put the amount of fraud in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. It dwarfs the entire annual U.S. GDP — every single dollar that changes hands in the US in the course of a year. That’s about 13 trillion per year.
These ‘Banksters’ took our money, then used it to place bogus, leveraged bets in a giant global financial casino, until the music stopped playing, at which point they LOST our money. That’s the fucking issue. That’s why there’s a public bailout, because Citi, Chase, Goldman and the others lost our money. They are at the center of the universe in terms of blame. Joe Homeowner is a drop in the bucket.
July 27, 2010 at 12:14 AM #583701gandalf
ParticipantGovernment is not the problem. Government had a PROPER ROLE in regulating the financial markets, as it did since the Great Depression. Dismantling of government regulation of the financial industry over the last 10-15 years is one of the principal enabling reasons for the economic meltdown that’s occurred.
Context matters here, Joe Homeowner is a minor part of the problem. Foreclosures in the ‘retail’ housing market are the tip of the iceberg. In the past 15 years or so, large banks and financial institutions ‘created’ and then lost enormous, titanic sums of money in risky, leveraged and often fraudulent financial dealings.
The amounts DWARF the total sum value of all of the housing stock in America. The sum total value of all of our houses is only about $20T. Conservative estimates put the amount of fraud in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. It dwarfs the entire annual U.S. GDP — every single dollar that changes hands in the US in the course of a year. That’s about 13 trillion per year.
These ‘Banksters’ took our money, then used it to place bogus, leveraged bets in a giant global financial casino, until the music stopped playing, at which point they LOST our money. That’s the fucking issue. That’s why there’s a public bailout, because Citi, Chase, Goldman and the others lost our money. They are at the center of the universe in terms of blame. Joe Homeowner is a drop in the bucket.
July 27, 2010 at 12:14 AM #584005gandalf
ParticipantGovernment is not the problem. Government had a PROPER ROLE in regulating the financial markets, as it did since the Great Depression. Dismantling of government regulation of the financial industry over the last 10-15 years is one of the principal enabling reasons for the economic meltdown that’s occurred.
Context matters here, Joe Homeowner is a minor part of the problem. Foreclosures in the ‘retail’ housing market are the tip of the iceberg. In the past 15 years or so, large banks and financial institutions ‘created’ and then lost enormous, titanic sums of money in risky, leveraged and often fraudulent financial dealings.
The amounts DWARF the total sum value of all of the housing stock in America. The sum total value of all of our houses is only about $20T. Conservative estimates put the amount of fraud in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. It dwarfs the entire annual U.S. GDP — every single dollar that changes hands in the US in the course of a year. That’s about 13 trillion per year.
These ‘Banksters’ took our money, then used it to place bogus, leveraged bets in a giant global financial casino, until the music stopped playing, at which point they LOST our money. That’s the fucking issue. That’s why there’s a public bailout, because Citi, Chase, Goldman and the others lost our money. They are at the center of the universe in terms of blame. Joe Homeowner is a drop in the bucket.
July 27, 2010 at 12:15 AM #582977sdrealtor
ParticipantIt started much longer thna 15 years ago. It started in the Reagan Era where “greed became good”. Just like this ship turns slowly, the political actions of today are felt many years in the future. Most of our current economic issues are rooted firmly in the Reagan Era.
July 27, 2010 at 12:15 AM #583069sdrealtor
ParticipantIt started much longer thna 15 years ago. It started in the Reagan Era where “greed became good”. Just like this ship turns slowly, the political actions of today are felt many years in the future. Most of our current economic issues are rooted firmly in the Reagan Era.
July 27, 2010 at 12:15 AM #583604sdrealtor
ParticipantIt started much longer thna 15 years ago. It started in the Reagan Era where “greed became good”. Just like this ship turns slowly, the political actions of today are felt many years in the future. Most of our current economic issues are rooted firmly in the Reagan Era.
July 27, 2010 at 12:15 AM #583711sdrealtor
ParticipantIt started much longer thna 15 years ago. It started in the Reagan Era where “greed became good”. Just like this ship turns slowly, the political actions of today are felt many years in the future. Most of our current economic issues are rooted firmly in the Reagan Era.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.