Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Big Takeover
- This topic has 540 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM #371166March 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM #370563
aldante
ParticipantOur great country.
Wow.March 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM #370846ParticipantOur great country.
Wow.March 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM #371014ParticipantOur great country.
Wow.March 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM #371058ParticipantOur great country.
Wow.March 20, 2009 at 2:34 PM #371171ParticipantOur great country.
Wow.March 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM #370568jpinpb
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Now for the real fun. Page through the comments following the article and find the one about Obama accepting $3.3MM in campaign contributions from all of the large players named in the article, including AIG.
That ought to add to that wonderful feeling in your midsection.[/quote]
Here’s the rest of it:
Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823
Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:
Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
Disappointing, to say the least. I was cautiously hopeful, but now it’s discouraging and disenchanting.
March 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM #370853Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Now for the real fun. Page through the comments following the article and find the one about Obama accepting $3.3MM in campaign contributions from all of the large players named in the article, including AIG.
That ought to add to that wonderful feeling in your midsection.[/quote]
Here’s the rest of it:
Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823
Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:
Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
Disappointing, to say the least. I was cautiously hopeful, but now it’s discouraging and disenchanting.
March 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM #371020Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Now for the real fun. Page through the comments following the article and find the one about Obama accepting $3.3MM in campaign contributions from all of the large players named in the article, including AIG.
That ought to add to that wonderful feeling in your midsection.[/quote]
Here’s the rest of it:
Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823
Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:
Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
Disappointing, to say the least. I was cautiously hopeful, but now it’s discouraging and disenchanting.
March 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM #371064Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Now for the real fun. Page through the comments following the article and find the one about Obama accepting $3.3MM in campaign contributions from all of the large players named in the article, including AIG.
That ought to add to that wonderful feeling in your midsection.[/quote]
Here’s the rest of it:
Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823
Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:
Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
Disappointing, to say the least. I was cautiously hopeful, but now it’s discouraging and disenchanting.
March 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM #371177Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Now for the real fun. Page through the comments following the article and find the one about Obama accepting $3.3MM in campaign contributions from all of the large players named in the article, including AIG.
That ought to add to that wonderful feeling in your midsection.[/quote]
Here’s the rest of it:
Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823
Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:
Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
Disappointing, to say the least. I was cautiously hopeful, but now it’s discouraging and disenchanting.
March 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM #370573Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantJp: I understand discouraged and disenchanted, but can we limit mention of stringing guys up by their balls and the whole Lorena Bobbitt thing?
Please?
March 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM #370858ParticipantJp: I understand discouraged and disenchanted, but can we limit mention of stringing guys up by their balls and the whole Lorena Bobbitt thing?
Please?
March 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM #371025ParticipantJp: I understand discouraged and disenchanted, but can we limit mention of stringing guys up by their balls and the whole Lorena Bobbitt thing?
Please?
March 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM #371069ParticipantJp: I understand discouraged and disenchanted, but can we limit mention of stringing guys up by their balls and the whole Lorena Bobbitt thing?
Please?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.