Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Big Takeover
- This topic has 540 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2009 at 12:38 AM #372145March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM #371537equalizerParticipant
Hate to spoil this great party, but Barry Ritholtz says Liddy is not the bad guy and points to Washington post and to Fortune article for more details.
For those 2 people not familiar with Barry, he is a long term bear, hedge fund guy who is not afraid to ridicule Wall St.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/investigating-aig/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/index.html
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/23/news/companies/AIG_150bailout_Loomis.fortune/index.htm
March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM #371824equalizerParticipantHate to spoil this great party, but Barry Ritholtz says Liddy is not the bad guy and points to Washington post and to Fortune article for more details.
For those 2 people not familiar with Barry, he is a long term bear, hedge fund guy who is not afraid to ridicule Wall St.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/investigating-aig/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/index.html
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/23/news/companies/AIG_150bailout_Loomis.fortune/index.htm
March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM #371994equalizerParticipantHate to spoil this great party, but Barry Ritholtz says Liddy is not the bad guy and points to Washington post and to Fortune article for more details.
For those 2 people not familiar with Barry, he is a long term bear, hedge fund guy who is not afraid to ridicule Wall St.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/investigating-aig/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/index.html
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/23/news/companies/AIG_150bailout_Loomis.fortune/index.htm
March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM #372038equalizerParticipantHate to spoil this great party, but Barry Ritholtz says Liddy is not the bad guy and points to Washington post and to Fortune article for more details.
For those 2 people not familiar with Barry, he is a long term bear, hedge fund guy who is not afraid to ridicule Wall St.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/investigating-aig/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/index.html
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/23/news/companies/AIG_150bailout_Loomis.fortune/index.htm
March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM #372150equalizerParticipantHate to spoil this great party, but Barry Ritholtz says Liddy is not the bad guy and points to Washington post and to Fortune article for more details.
For those 2 people not familiar with Barry, he is a long term bear, hedge fund guy who is not afraid to ridicule Wall St.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/investigating-aig/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/index.html
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/23/news/companies/AIG_150bailout_Loomis.fortune/index.htm
March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM #371543equalizerParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Don’t you find it strange that Bernie Madoff did not go to trial, but, rather, took the full weight (150 year sentence) and went straight to prison?
What do you want to bet that, for almost all of these guys (like Allen Stanford, of Stanford Financial), there won’t be a trial at all?
I think if the US government opens up that particular door, there will be a huge backlash with potentially lethal consequences for a lot of those folks involved in the fiasco.
There were AIG employees afraid to go to work because of the potential for violence. There were death threats left on voice mail and email and people actually out in front of the office.
This is going to get ugly, especially as the situation worsens.[/quote]
Alan,
No one, no one, no one ever is to blame.
Certainly not guys working seventy hours a week counting all their commissions.BTW: I’ve steered jp to gold jewelry place, make her forget all about knives.
March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM #371831equalizerParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Don’t you find it strange that Bernie Madoff did not go to trial, but, rather, took the full weight (150 year sentence) and went straight to prison?
What do you want to bet that, for almost all of these guys (like Allen Stanford, of Stanford Financial), there won’t be a trial at all?
I think if the US government opens up that particular door, there will be a huge backlash with potentially lethal consequences for a lot of those folks involved in the fiasco.
There were AIG employees afraid to go to work because of the potential for violence. There were death threats left on voice mail and email and people actually out in front of the office.
This is going to get ugly, especially as the situation worsens.[/quote]
Alan,
No one, no one, no one ever is to blame.
Certainly not guys working seventy hours a week counting all their commissions.BTW: I’ve steered jp to gold jewelry place, make her forget all about knives.
March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM #372002equalizerParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Don’t you find it strange that Bernie Madoff did not go to trial, but, rather, took the full weight (150 year sentence) and went straight to prison?
What do you want to bet that, for almost all of these guys (like Allen Stanford, of Stanford Financial), there won’t be a trial at all?
I think if the US government opens up that particular door, there will be a huge backlash with potentially lethal consequences for a lot of those folks involved in the fiasco.
There were AIG employees afraid to go to work because of the potential for violence. There were death threats left on voice mail and email and people actually out in front of the office.
This is going to get ugly, especially as the situation worsens.[/quote]
Alan,
No one, no one, no one ever is to blame.
Certainly not guys working seventy hours a week counting all their commissions.BTW: I’ve steered jp to gold jewelry place, make her forget all about knives.
March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM #372043equalizerParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Don’t you find it strange that Bernie Madoff did not go to trial, but, rather, took the full weight (150 year sentence) and went straight to prison?
What do you want to bet that, for almost all of these guys (like Allen Stanford, of Stanford Financial), there won’t be a trial at all?
I think if the US government opens up that particular door, there will be a huge backlash with potentially lethal consequences for a lot of those folks involved in the fiasco.
There were AIG employees afraid to go to work because of the potential for violence. There were death threats left on voice mail and email and people actually out in front of the office.
This is going to get ugly, especially as the situation worsens.[/quote]
Alan,
No one, no one, no one ever is to blame.
Certainly not guys working seventy hours a week counting all their commissions.BTW: I’ve steered jp to gold jewelry place, make her forget all about knives.
March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM #372157equalizerParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Jp: Don’t you find it strange that Bernie Madoff did not go to trial, but, rather, took the full weight (150 year sentence) and went straight to prison?
What do you want to bet that, for almost all of these guys (like Allen Stanford, of Stanford Financial), there won’t be a trial at all?
I think if the US government opens up that particular door, there will be a huge backlash with potentially lethal consequences for a lot of those folks involved in the fiasco.
There were AIG employees afraid to go to work because of the potential for violence. There were death threats left on voice mail and email and people actually out in front of the office.
This is going to get ugly, especially as the situation worsens.[/quote]
Alan,
No one, no one, no one ever is to blame.
Certainly not guys working seventy hours a week counting all their commissions.BTW: I’ve steered jp to gold jewelry place, make her forget all about knives.
March 23, 2009 at 8:36 AM #371577jpinpbParticipantI may be a girl, but I figured by now you know I’m a tom-boy. Not into jewelry. That must explain my complete stupidity when it comes to gold. But I have considered taking all those involved, lining them up against the wall and trying the spray and pray technique explained on another thread. j/k
March 23, 2009 at 8:36 AM #371866jpinpbParticipantI may be a girl, but I figured by now you know I’m a tom-boy. Not into jewelry. That must explain my complete stupidity when it comes to gold. But I have considered taking all those involved, lining them up against the wall and trying the spray and pray technique explained on another thread. j/k
March 23, 2009 at 8:36 AM #372037jpinpbParticipantI may be a girl, but I figured by now you know I’m a tom-boy. Not into jewelry. That must explain my complete stupidity when it comes to gold. But I have considered taking all those involved, lining them up against the wall and trying the spray and pray technique explained on another thread. j/k
March 23, 2009 at 8:36 AM #372078jpinpbParticipantI may be a girl, but I figured by now you know I’m a tom-boy. Not into jewelry. That must explain my complete stupidity when it comes to gold. But I have considered taking all those involved, lining them up against the wall and trying the spray and pray technique explained on another thread. j/k
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.