- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578765July 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM #577851(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
[quote=patb][quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.[/quote]
This is true for those of us without the funds to completely pay off the loan at any time.
However, for those who can, it is a cheap source of capital.
July 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM #577946(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=patb][quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.[/quote]
This is true for those of us without the funds to completely pay off the loan at any time.
However, for those who can, it is a cheap source of capital.
July 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM #578472(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=patb][quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.[/quote]
This is true for those of us without the funds to completely pay off the loan at any time.
However, for those who can, it is a cheap source of capital.
July 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM #578578(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=patb][quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.[/quote]
This is true for those of us without the funds to completely pay off the loan at any time.
However, for those who can, it is a cheap source of capital.
July 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM #578880(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=patb][quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.[/quote]
This is true for those of us without the funds to completely pay off the loan at any time.
However, for those who can, it is a cheap source of capital.
July 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM #577891jpinpbParticipantHold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.
July 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM #577986jpinpbParticipantHold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.
July 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM #578512jpinpbParticipantHold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.
July 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM #578618jpinpbParticipantHold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.
July 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM #578920jpinpbParticipantHold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.
July 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM #578046(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Hold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.[/quote]
Looked at the link … Now those are some stinker loans !! Why not just have an indefinite-term interest-only loan ?
July 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM #578140(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Hold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.[/quote]
Looked at the link … Now those are some stinker loans !! Why not just have an indefinite-term interest-only loan ?
July 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM #578667(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Hold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.[/quote]
Looked at the link … Now those are some stinker loans !! Why not just have an indefinite-term interest-only loan ?
July 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM #578772(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jpinpb]Hold the phone, everyone. These are even uglier loans:
Remember those horrific option ARMs? Well they are now morphing into other products
Shocked yet? Well how about a 40 year IndyMac loan modification.
An example, Modified Unpaid Principal Balance 472,136. Maturity Date 6/1/46.I guess we’ll be kicking the can until it’s time for the newborns of today to be old enough buy.[/quote]
Looked at the link … Now those are some stinker loans !! Why not just have an indefinite-term interest-only loan ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.