Terrorism

[NotCranky]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture

[surveyor]

russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.

[surveyor]

russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.

[surveyor]

russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.

[surveyor]

russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.

[surveyor]

russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.

[Arraya]

[quote=Russell][quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture%5B/quote%5D

It’s pretty embarrassing for the Army and CIA.

So what happens? He goes to his superior officer and says, hey I’m a looney muslim and I am going to snap. Here is a report that I did on it.

Told everybody he knows that is going to snap and hints at violence towards the troops.

The officer sends his case to DHS or what ever the chain is.

Then CIA comes in observes him and what, Russ?

They just could not figure it out? Was it too obvious?

Does it get anymore obvious than this? What am I missing?

[Arraya]

[quote=Russell][quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture%5B/quote%5D

It’s pretty embarrassing for the Army and CIA.

So what happens? He goes to his superior officer and says, hey I’m a looney muslim and I am going to snap. Here is a report that I did on it.

Told everybody he knows that is going to snap and hints at violence towards the troops.

The officer sends his case to DHS or what ever the chain is.

Then CIA comes in observes him and what, Russ?

They just could not figure it out? Was it too obvious?

Does it get anymore obvious than this? What am I missing?

[Arraya]

[quote=Russell][quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture%5B/quote%5D

It’s pretty embarrassing for the Army and CIA.

So what happens? He goes to his superior officer and says, hey I’m a looney muslim and I am going to snap. Here is a report that I did on it.

Told everybody he knows that is going to snap and hints at violence towards the troops.

The officer sends his case to DHS or what ever the chain is.

Then CIA comes in observes him and what, Russ?

They just could not figure it out? Was it too obvious?

Does it get anymore obvious than this? What am I missing?

[Arraya]

[quote=Russell][quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture%5B/quote%5D

It’s pretty embarrassing for the Army and CIA.

So what happens? He goes to his superior officer and says, hey I’m a looney muslim and I am going to snap. Here is a report that I did on it.

Told everybody he knows that is going to snap and hints at violence towards the troops.

The officer sends his case to DHS or what ever the chain is.

Then CIA comes in observes him and what, Russ?

They just could not figure it out? Was it too obvious?

Does it get anymore obvious than this? What am I missing?

[Arraya]

[quote=Russell][quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture%5B/quote%5D

It’s pretty embarrassing for the Army and CIA.

So what happens? He goes to his superior officer and says, hey I’m a looney muslim and I am going to snap. Here is a report that I did on it.

Told everybody he knows that is going to snap and hints at violence towards the troops.

The officer sends his case to DHS or what ever the chain is.

Then CIA comes in observes him and what, Russ?

They just could not figure it out? Was it too obvious?

Does it get anymore obvious than this? What am I missing?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.[/quote]

Bigoted minority.
Love it.

I can spell hypocrite too.

I find it interesting that you claim to not “partake in indiscriminate treatment… due to …religion” yet say things about a religion which are inaccurate and ascribe motivations to individuals based on those assertions.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.[/quote]

Bigoted minority.
Love it.

I can spell hypocrite too.

I find it interesting that you claim to not “partake in indiscriminate treatment… due to …religion” yet say things about a religion which are inaccurate and ascribe motivations to individuals based on those assertions.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.[/quote]

Bigoted minority.
Love it.

I can spell hypocrite too.

I find it interesting that you claim to not “partake in indiscriminate treatment… due to …religion” yet say things about a religion which are inaccurate and ascribe motivations to individuals based on those assertions.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]russell:

It would be a mistake to characterize my reporting of the facts on the characteristics, beginnings, and development of a jihadist as an approval of the treatment of Japanese Americans in World War II (or any indiscriminate treatment of individuals due to their color, creed or religion).

I have never advocated that position before, now, or ever, especially as an Asian American myself.[/quote]

Bigoted minority.
Love it.

I can spell hypocrite too.

I find it interesting that you claim to not “partake in indiscriminate treatment… due to …religion” yet say things about a religion which are inaccurate and ascribe motivations to individuals based on those assertions.

[Author]

Posts