Terrorism

[surveyor]

blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

Yeah.
Compared to you she looks like a real whack job.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

Yeah.
Compared to you she looks like a real whack job.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

Yeah.
Compared to you she looks like a real whack job.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

Yeah.
Compared to you she looks like a real whack job.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

Yeah.
Compared to you she looks like a real whack job.

[surveyor]

=shrug=

I got facts. Arraya doesn’t and is about a couple of statements away from being a truther. If you’re unable to understand that, dan, you’ve got a long way to go towards analytical thinking.

Unfortunately dan name-calling doesn’t hurt me or my arguments. It does however make you look bad.

[surveyor]

=shrug=

I got facts. Arraya doesn’t and is about a couple of statements away from being a truther. If you’re unable to understand that, dan, you’ve got a long way to go towards analytical thinking.

Unfortunately dan name-calling doesn’t hurt me or my arguments. It does however make you look bad.

[surveyor]

=shrug=

I got facts. Arraya doesn’t and is about a couple of statements away from being a truther. If you’re unable to understand that, dan, you’ve got a long way to go towards analytical thinking.

Unfortunately dan name-calling doesn’t hurt me or my arguments. It does however make you look bad.

[surveyor]

=shrug=

I got facts. Arraya doesn’t and is about a couple of statements away from being a truther. If you’re unable to understand that, dan, you’ve got a long way to go towards analytical thinking.

Unfortunately dan name-calling doesn’t hurt me or my arguments. It does however make you look bad.

[surveyor]

=shrug=

I got facts. Arraya doesn’t and is about a couple of statements away from being a truther. If you’re unable to understand that, dan, you’ve got a long way to go towards analytical thinking.

Unfortunately dan name-calling doesn’t hurt me or my arguments. It does however make you look bad.

[NotCranky]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture

[NotCranky]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture

[NotCranky]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture

[NotCranky]

[quote=surveyor]blinders

I don’t believe the CIA let it happen. I surmise that they, like you Arraya, didn’t want to give credence to the idea that he, as a muslim, could be more susceptible to jihadist philosophy than a christian and they did not analyze or care to understand how the core teachings of Islam can lead one to jihadism.

That’s how I feel.

There is evidence for my hypothesis. There is zero evidence for yours. When this situation happens, the one with zero is the whack job.[/quote]

The CIA knows that the overwhelming vast majority of American muslims do not take up arms and they let this one get by… a heavy dose of incompetency probably came into play. Mabye they just screwed up big time.

I also don’t believe the CIA let people die for propaganda’s sake but it is working out that way in some ways.

This whole episode makes me think of the Japanese Americans and internment camps. We will see where it goes. A lot of people took a surveyor type position on that one too.

The Feds make a big move today. Saving face? making a big show?Intimidation. Apparently not one person was detained. Isn’t that odd?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091113/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture

[Author]

Posts