- This topic has 1,215 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM #482337November 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM #481509
Anonymous
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.
November 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM #481676Anonymous
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.
November 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM #482042Anonymous
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.
November 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM #482120Anonymous
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.
November 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM #482345Anonymous
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.
November 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM #481519briansd1
GuestThis is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?
If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?
Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.
But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?
November 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM #481686briansd1
GuestThis is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?
If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?
Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.
But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?
November 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM #482052briansd1
GuestThis is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?
If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?
Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.
But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?
November 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM #482130briansd1
GuestThis is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?
If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?
Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.
But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?
November 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM #482355briansd1
GuestThis is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?
If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?
Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.
But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?
November 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM #481528Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]
Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.
I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.
I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.
After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.
November 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM #481695Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]
Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.
I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.
I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.
After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.
November 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM #482061Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]
Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.
I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.
I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.
After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.
November 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM #482139Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]
I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.
And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.
I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]
Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.
I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.
I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.
After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.