Terrorism

[Aecetia]

What difference does it make what religion or background Allan has? How is that germane to this discussion? If he was a “Hebe,” should his comments be discounted? That strikes me as bigoted.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.

[briansd1]

This is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?

If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?

Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.

But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?

[briansd1]

This is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?

If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?

Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.

But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?

[briansd1]

This is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?

If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?

Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.

But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?

[briansd1]

This is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?

If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?

Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.

But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?

[briansd1]

This is today, why are we talking about the Crusades?

If that were so important, then why not talk about slavery which is a lot more recent?

Conservatives think that what was done by parents and grand-parents have no bearing on today’s society, hence no need for affirmation action and programs to give opportunities to disadvantaged citizens.

But the Conservatives believe that the Crusades are relevant to today’s Islam?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]

Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.

I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.

I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.

After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]

Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.

I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.

I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.

After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]

Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.

I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.

I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.

After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Under Geneva, that makes him a spy […][/quote]

I agree. In fact I said that he was “either a spy or murderer” in an earlier post in this thread.

And by all means execute him, as either crime fits the punishment.

I just don’t want folks to claim that we’ve experienced another terrorist attack and therefore must invade another country.[/quote]

Pri: Well I, for one, am certainly not advocating invading anybody. I think our last couple of invasions have been difficult and expensive enough.

I also agree that trying to nail down, in terms of definition, exactly what Hasan is (or isn’t) matters far less than the crime itself.

I believe that extensive interrogation is warranted, if for no other reason than to see who and what he was in contact with, and to establish if additional risks remain.

After that, put him in front of a tribunal, find him guilty and punch his ticket.

[Author]

Posts