Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Temecula update
- This topic has 38 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
23109VC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 11:25 AM #10576
-
October 11, 2007 at 12:25 PM #88114
snail
ParticipantCorrect me if I am wrong, but I believe you pay about/close to $100/sq.ft. for your house?! My opinion is prices will not go much lower than that (OPINION was not back by any data!). My personal dislike about Harveston and the Spencer Crossing developments are the high tax rate (1.9%) which just going to kill my budget, however Harveston is actually really convenient location and pleasant and if you have kids it should be great (Spencer is just to remote for my taste).
Regarding the Rent in Temecula, I sure don’t see any pricing going up. Its probably just people trying to minimize their monthly losses.
Well don’t worry about the bear here, enjoy your home. A house is a home not an investment anyway…..-
October 11, 2007 at 1:49 PM #88168
snail
Participant$100/sq.ft. for your house?! My opinion is prices will not go much lower than that
I was wrong…so…wrong…sic
http://housing-kaboom.blogspot.com/2007/10/broken-100-sqft-barrier.html-
October 11, 2007 at 2:07 PM #88170
bsrsharma
ParticipantSnail: Your link doesn’t have any Temecula homes; Right? I think the OP bought a Temecula home for $100/sqft. That is a good deal. When at least 25% of SD county homes reach $100 mark, I think you can call bottom.
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:32 PM #88174
23109VC
Participanti did NOT buy for $100/sq ft. 🙂 I wish.
I still got a good deal. I paid a good $100k less than ANYONE on my street. The seller bought at peak pricing, and ate the loss. He was a $$$$ investor dumping a lot of property, and wanted out, fast.
the cheapest house I have seen in my immediate neighborhood that is for sale is still priced 50k more than I paid.
there are amazing deals out here, but like another person pointed out, Spencer’s Crossing and stuff in that area, is a bit more remote and less convenient. for people with kids, Harveston is an ideal setting. parks, lake, pool facility, easy access to freeway, mall, and of course COSTCO!. plus it’s 5 min from my office. going home for lunch is hard to beat.
i bet things will still slide down. i’m just not so sure how far.
ultimately, these houses are worth what they will rent out for. so while prices may come down, i don’t see prices falling so low that you could buy one for less than you could rent if for…. someone correct me if i’m wrong…but if you can figure out roughly what a hosue SHOULD rent for, can’t you ultimately determine the bottom line range of what it could sell for – assuming it went to investors who would rent it out?
assume a hous would rent for 1800-2000 – what’s it’s “value”…..wasn’t there a formula that houses are worth 200x the rent or something…
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:51 PM #88183
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSo you were the comp killer what cause that whole slide, ha.haha.
Within $50k from the next best deal… Well, I’m afraid that your great deal will turn out to be mediocre at best It’s all relative anyway so if you’re happy, then that’s all that counts.
Did you add up all the ownership premium over time? And what those would be worth if you had wisely invested the money?
You sound like a realist who can see the market for what it is. Why not keep track of the difference been buy and rent since your purchase and after 10 years see what the difference is. It would be a good lesson to hand down to the kids.
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:51 PM #88186
patientlywaiting
ParticipantSo you were the comp killer what cause that whole slide, ha.haha.
Within $50k from the next best deal… Well, I’m afraid that your great deal will turn out to be mediocre at best It’s all relative anyway so if you’re happy, then that’s all that counts.
Did you add up all the ownership premium over time? And what those would be worth if you had wisely invested the money?
You sound like a realist who can see the market for what it is. Why not keep track of the difference been buy and rent since your purchase and after 10 years see what the difference is. It would be a good lesson to hand down to the kids.
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:52 PM #88185
bsrsharma
Participant23… How does the price you paid compare with that (kaboom) link? Can you tell the price & area or price/sqft? Is your home in Temecula city limits?
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:52 PM #88188
bsrsharma
Participant23… How does the price you paid compare with that (kaboom) link? Can you tell the price & area or price/sqft? Is your home in Temecula city limits?
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:32 PM #88178
23109VC
Participanti did NOT buy for $100/sq ft. 🙂 I wish.
I still got a good deal. I paid a good $100k less than ANYONE on my street. The seller bought at peak pricing, and ate the loss. He was a $$$$ investor dumping a lot of property, and wanted out, fast.
the cheapest house I have seen in my immediate neighborhood that is for sale is still priced 50k more than I paid.
there are amazing deals out here, but like another person pointed out, Spencer’s Crossing and stuff in that area, is a bit more remote and less convenient. for people with kids, Harveston is an ideal setting. parks, lake, pool facility, easy access to freeway, mall, and of course COSTCO!. plus it’s 5 min from my office. going home for lunch is hard to beat.
i bet things will still slide down. i’m just not so sure how far.
ultimately, these houses are worth what they will rent out for. so while prices may come down, i don’t see prices falling so low that you could buy one for less than you could rent if for…. someone correct me if i’m wrong…but if you can figure out roughly what a hosue SHOULD rent for, can’t you ultimately determine the bottom line range of what it could sell for – assuming it went to investors who would rent it out?
assume a hous would rent for 1800-2000 – what’s it’s “value”…..wasn’t there a formula that houses are worth 200x the rent or something…
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:21 PM #88190
snail
ParticipantYour link doesn’t have any Temecula homes; Right?
Right, its Murrieta and Lake Elsinore and Perris. However its close by, you could call it in Temecula neck of wood. Temecula still command a higher prices right now, but not for long…..
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:21 PM #88194
snail
ParticipantYour link doesn’t have any Temecula homes; Right?
Right, its Murrieta and Lake Elsinore and Perris. However its close by, you could call it in Temecula neck of wood. Temecula still command a higher prices right now, but not for long…..
-
October 11, 2007 at 2:07 PM #88175
bsrsharma
ParticipantSnail: Your link doesn’t have any Temecula homes; Right? I think the OP bought a Temecula home for $100/sqft. That is a good deal. When at least 25% of SD county homes reach $100 mark, I think you can call bottom.
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 1:49 PM #88173
snail
Participant$100/sq.ft. for your house?! My opinion is prices will not go much lower than that
I was wrong…so…wrong…sic
http://housing-kaboom.blogspot.com/2007/10/broken-100-sqft-barrier.html
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 12:25 PM #88119
snail
ParticipantCorrect me if I am wrong, but I believe you pay about/close to $100/sq.ft. for your house?! My opinion is prices will not go much lower than that (OPINION was not back by any data!). My personal dislike about Harveston and the Spencer Crossing developments are the high tax rate (1.9%) which just going to kill my budget, however Harveston is actually really convenient location and pleasant and if you have kids it should be great (Spencer is just to remote for my taste).
Regarding the Rent in Temecula, I sure don’t see any pricing going up. Its probably just people trying to minimize their monthly losses.
Well don’t worry about the bear here, enjoy your home. A house is a home not an investment anyway….. -
October 11, 2007 at 12:35 PM #88122
gn
Participant23109VC,
Kudos to you for having the courage to look at things the way they are. Many folks who have bought are in total denial about the current state of the market.
hey, if prices fall badly enough, i'll buy ANOTHER House and rent out the one i'm in now. 🙂Â
If you can afford the negative cashflow from renting out your current house, that's not a bad strategy.Â
I was suprised to see rents have gone UP in my area
The main reason that rents have gone up is because of the supply reduction. Many investors who previously rented out their houses have given up & let the lenders foreclose. These houses are currently vacant but are not available for rent. At some point in the future, the lenders will dump these houses a fire-sale prices & investors will scoop them up & rent them out. Then, rent will come down. Basically, rents have gone up because of an artificial reduction in the rental supply.
Of course, people who lost their primary residences to foreclosure also contribute to the rental shortage. But this is a minor factor.
-
October 11, 2007 at 1:38 PM #88162
patientlywaiting
Participant23109VC, I can’t believe you’ve been reading this site and still you went out and bought a few months back.
Anyway, do keep us to date on Temecula. Yes, kudos to you for being realistic even though you purchased recently.
-
October 11, 2007 at 1:38 PM #88167
patientlywaiting
Participant23109VC, I can’t believe you’ve been reading this site and still you went out and bought a few months back.
Anyway, do keep us to date on Temecula. Yes, kudos to you for being realistic even though you purchased recently.
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 12:35 PM #88127
gn
Participant23109VC,
Kudos to you for having the courage to look at things the way they are. Many folks who have bought are in total denial about the current state of the market.
hey, if prices fall badly enough, i'll buy ANOTHER House and rent out the one i'm in now. 🙂Â
If you can afford the negative cashflow from renting out your current house, that's not a bad strategy.Â
I was suprised to see rents have gone UP in my area
The main reason that rents have gone up is because of the supply reduction. Many investors who previously rented out their houses have given up & let the lenders foreclose. These houses are currently vacant but are not available for rent. At some point in the future, the lenders will dump these houses a fire-sale prices & investors will scoop them up & rent them out. Then, rent will come down. Basically, rents have gone up because of an artificial reduction in the rental supply.
Of course, people who lost their primary residences to foreclosure also contribute to the rental shortage. But this is a minor factor.
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:09 PM #88187
Tuba
Participant$64/Sqft Temecula Home
Houses like this will be the final nail in the coffin. Bank owned, wishing to unload. You can thank the selfish buyers for the final FU to the neighborhood by doing what they did.
$221,900
4 Bed, 4 Bath
3,468 Sq. Ft.
0.23 Acres
MLS ID# T071462622005: Paid $552,500
Bank selling for: $221,900
Based off the pictures and extra description, at the most $40k to bring it back to normal.-
October 11, 2007 at 3:25 PM #88195
snail
Participant2005: Paid $552,500
Bank selling for: $221,900
Based off the pictures and extra description, at the most $40k to bring it back to normal.Tuba are you handy? Lets flip this house!
Buy for $200,000
Budget $40,000 for fixing it
Sell for $500,000
Projected Profit of $260,000
Help! I am addicted to the show “FLIP THIS HOUSE” at TLC.-
October 11, 2007 at 3:45 PM #88205
Tuba
ParticipantI do work in the construction industry. But, that is an excellent opportunity for someone who is handy and wants to get their foot in the door on home ownership and of course is willing to stay there for at least 10 years ;).
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:45 PM #88208
Tuba
ParticipantI do work in the construction industry. But, that is an excellent opportunity for someone who is handy and wants to get their foot in the door on home ownership and of course is willing to stay there for at least 10 years ;).
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:25 PM #88199
snail
Participant2005: Paid $552,500
Bank selling for: $221,900
Based off the pictures and extra description, at the most $40k to bring it back to normal.Tuba are you handy? Lets flip this house!
Buy for $200,000
Budget $40,000 for fixing it
Sell for $500,000
Projected Profit of $260,000
Help! I am addicted to the show “FLIP THIS HOUSE” at TLC. -
October 11, 2007 at 3:40 PM #88203
JWM in SD
ParticipantHoly shit, that is what…a mile or so from the 15 off Winchester??? Wow, that’s almost worth the commute….
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:58 PM #88209
waterboy
Participant“if this keeps up you will be able to buya Mcmansion in Temecula, and I mean a nice part of temecula, and a BIG 3000+ sq ft home with ALL the bells and whistles for 300k. easily. the house that WAS 750k will be 300-350k.”
Are we forgetting that $750k house was briefly and very temporarily pushed to that level because of many fraudulent and dumbass individuals. It’s funny to see some think they are getting the house for half off at $375k. IMO you are getting it for damn near what the normal market fundamentals should have it at. That is why so many will continue to buy over the next two years only to find out a year later that they caught a falling knife.
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:58 PM #88213
waterboy
Participant“if this keeps up you will be able to buya Mcmansion in Temecula, and I mean a nice part of temecula, and a BIG 3000+ sq ft home with ALL the bells and whistles for 300k. easily. the house that WAS 750k will be 300-350k.”
Are we forgetting that $750k house was briefly and very temporarily pushed to that level because of many fraudulent and dumbass individuals. It’s funny to see some think they are getting the house for half off at $375k. IMO you are getting it for damn near what the normal market fundamentals should have it at. That is why so many will continue to buy over the next two years only to find out a year later that they caught a falling knife.
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:40 PM #88206
JWM in SD
ParticipantHoly shit, that is what…a mile or so from the 15 off Winchester??? Wow, that’s almost worth the commute….
-
October 11, 2007 at 4:07 PM #88210
bsrsharma
ParticipantWow! It was only built in 2005. How could they mess it up so badly in just 2 years? Houses like these should be good buy at 300K. Even at fix up cost of 40K, a profit of 40K remains.
-
October 11, 2007 at 4:54 PM #88226
gn
ParticipantThey didn’t mess it up while living there.
They purposely ripped out the “fixtures” before they left. -
October 11, 2007 at 5:00 PM #88228
bsrsharma
ParticipantCan they be criminally prosecuted for that (theft/vandalism)? Somebody should goto jail for intentionally inflicting that damage.
-
October 11, 2007 at 5:14 PM #88232
temeculaguy
ParticipantNo they can’t, they owned it and the dispute is civil, not criminal, they can be sued, that’s it.
Somebody call the realtors, I think this may be a typo. It does not appear on redfin, the mls or the webpage of the listing agent. In fact there is not a single house in that range in that zip code, I also ran it by the mls # and no results, there has to be more to the story here.
-
October 16, 2007 at 9:18 AM #89302
23109VC
Participantsuppose you can rent a house out for $1800-2000.
what do fundamentals say it should sell for?
-
October 16, 2007 at 9:18 AM #89311
23109VC
Participantsuppose you can rent a house out for $1800-2000.
what do fundamentals say it should sell for?
-
October 11, 2007 at 5:14 PM #88237
temeculaguy
ParticipantNo they can’t, they owned it and the dispute is civil, not criminal, they can be sued, that’s it.
Somebody call the realtors, I think this may be a typo. It does not appear on redfin, the mls or the webpage of the listing agent. In fact there is not a single house in that range in that zip code, I also ran it by the mls # and no results, there has to be more to the story here.
-
October 11, 2007 at 5:00 PM #88233
bsrsharma
ParticipantCan they be criminally prosecuted for that (theft/vandalism)? Somebody should goto jail for intentionally inflicting that damage.
-
October 11, 2007 at 4:54 PM #88231
gn
ParticipantThey didn’t mess it up while living there.
They purposely ripped out the “fixtures” before they left.
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 4:07 PM #88215
bsrsharma
ParticipantWow! It was only built in 2005. How could they mess it up so badly in just 2 years? Houses like these should be good buy at 300K. Even at fix up cost of 40K, a profit of 40K remains.
-
-
October 11, 2007 at 3:09 PM #88191
Tuba
Participant$64/Sqft Temecula Home
Houses like this will be the final nail in the coffin. Bank owned, wishing to unload. You can thank the selfish buyers for the final FU to the neighborhood by doing what they did.
$221,900
4 Bed, 4 Bath
3,468 Sq. Ft.
0.23 Acres
MLS ID# T071462622005: Paid $552,500
Bank selling for: $221,900
Based off the pictures and extra description, at the most $40k to bring it back to normal.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.