Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › TAX TAX TAX and more TAX
- This topic has 765 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 21, 2010 at 9:10 PM #542757April 21, 2010 at 9:17 PM #541820
SD Realtor
ParticipantYet another problem, you associate progressive with fairness.
Not everyone thinks the same way you do.
April 21, 2010 at 9:17 PM #541934SD Realtor
ParticipantYet another problem, you associate progressive with fairness.
Not everyone thinks the same way you do.
April 21, 2010 at 9:17 PM #542398SD Realtor
ParticipantYet another problem, you associate progressive with fairness.
Not everyone thinks the same way you do.
April 21, 2010 at 9:17 PM #542490SD Realtor
ParticipantYet another problem, you associate progressive with fairness.
Not everyone thinks the same way you do.
April 21, 2010 at 9:17 PM #542767SD Realtor
ParticipantYet another problem, you associate progressive with fairness.
Not everyone thinks the same way you do.
April 21, 2010 at 9:46 PM #541835blahblahblah
ParticipantI support a VAT to replace the sales taxes so that the consumption tax is spread out more evenly in the different stages of production.
Soooo naive. Sales taxes are for the state, this is a national VAT. So you will pay state sales tax + national VAT. Do you think the states will give up their sales tax revenue? No freaking way, our state is already on the brink.
It’s coming, we will have VAT soon plus the financial transaction tax.
April 21, 2010 at 9:46 PM #541948blahblahblah
ParticipantI support a VAT to replace the sales taxes so that the consumption tax is spread out more evenly in the different stages of production.
Soooo naive. Sales taxes are for the state, this is a national VAT. So you will pay state sales tax + national VAT. Do you think the states will give up their sales tax revenue? No freaking way, our state is already on the brink.
It’s coming, we will have VAT soon plus the financial transaction tax.
April 21, 2010 at 9:46 PM #542413blahblahblah
ParticipantI support a VAT to replace the sales taxes so that the consumption tax is spread out more evenly in the different stages of production.
Soooo naive. Sales taxes are for the state, this is a national VAT. So you will pay state sales tax + national VAT. Do you think the states will give up their sales tax revenue? No freaking way, our state is already on the brink.
It’s coming, we will have VAT soon plus the financial transaction tax.
April 21, 2010 at 9:46 PM #542505blahblahblah
ParticipantI support a VAT to replace the sales taxes so that the consumption tax is spread out more evenly in the different stages of production.
Soooo naive. Sales taxes are for the state, this is a national VAT. So you will pay state sales tax + national VAT. Do you think the states will give up their sales tax revenue? No freaking way, our state is already on the brink.
It’s coming, we will have VAT soon plus the financial transaction tax.
April 21, 2010 at 9:46 PM #542782blahblahblah
ParticipantI support a VAT to replace the sales taxes so that the consumption tax is spread out more evenly in the different stages of production.
Soooo naive. Sales taxes are for the state, this is a national VAT. So you will pay state sales tax + national VAT. Do you think the states will give up their sales tax revenue? No freaking way, our state is already on the brink.
It’s coming, we will have VAT soon plus the financial transaction tax.
April 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM #541840gandalf
ParticipantAre you suggesting ‘regressive’ is fair?
Because that’s what we have in place right now. And it’s definitely not fair.
A flat tax with no avoidance. Great in theory. How is it implemented? How is income defined? What about gains from capital? Anything to reduce the absurd degree of tax avoidance and shirking in the current system.
April 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM #541953gandalf
ParticipantAre you suggesting ‘regressive’ is fair?
Because that’s what we have in place right now. And it’s definitely not fair.
A flat tax with no avoidance. Great in theory. How is it implemented? How is income defined? What about gains from capital? Anything to reduce the absurd degree of tax avoidance and shirking in the current system.
April 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM #542418gandalf
ParticipantAre you suggesting ‘regressive’ is fair?
Because that’s what we have in place right now. And it’s definitely not fair.
A flat tax with no avoidance. Great in theory. How is it implemented? How is income defined? What about gains from capital? Anything to reduce the absurd degree of tax avoidance and shirking in the current system.
April 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM #542510gandalf
ParticipantAre you suggesting ‘regressive’ is fair?
Because that’s what we have in place right now. And it’s definitely not fair.
A flat tax with no avoidance. Great in theory. How is it implemented? How is income defined? What about gains from capital? Anything to reduce the absurd degree of tax avoidance and shirking in the current system.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
