- This topic has 10 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by .
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Substantial Loss in College Area
Good info, PC.
I look askance at any property listing that won’t provide a picture (despite the agent/owner describing it as “really cute.”) Also – what’s up with 4824 71TH ST? Doesn’t he mean 71st St? It doesn’t look good when the street name is misspelled in the listing – I wonder what else the owner is going to get wrong.
It was just listed 1 day ago. give him a day to finish the Photoshop work on the pictures to make the house look habitable.
This is all you need to know
“Owner is real estate agent. Bring all offers.”
SDR – that’s pretty funny. With Photoshop, I guess he could use the expand tool to make the rooms look bigger. And, the perspective tool could straighten out the leaning roof.
Also possible to prune the landscape without hiring a gardener.
How about that ocean view;)
Good post PC. About that “cute” remark… the Freakonomics bestseller book reports that words like cute, cozy, charming, etc., are associated with less desirable properties and hence, lower prices. Realtors use those words when they can’t say new construction, pool, ocean view, hardwood flooring, etc., which are associated with more desirable, and more expensive, houses.
Check out MLS# 061040555. I’d say that house is cute, cozy and charming.
duplicate
sdrealtor, that house is cute but not $1.2 million cute — more like 500k. The decoration is too grandmotherly in my view.
The house is on over 1/2 acre in Olivenhain a stones throw from RSF. It has tons of character, beautiful grounds, nice views etc. You will grow old waiting for houses like that to sell anywhere near $500K.