- This topic has 10 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 10 months ago by
donaldduckmoore.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 21, 2008 at 2:37 PM #11583January 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #139910
mixxalot
ParticipantStinky sellers
Better name for them because of their greed they smell to high heaven.
January 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #140123mixxalot
ParticipantStinky sellers
Better name for them because of their greed they smell to high heaven.
January 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #140145mixxalot
ParticipantStinky sellers
Better name for them because of their greed they smell to high heaven.
January 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #140172mixxalot
ParticipantStinky sellers
Better name for them because of their greed they smell to high heaven.
January 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #140219mixxalot
ParticipantStinky sellers
Better name for them because of their greed they smell to high heaven.
January 21, 2008 at 2:50 PM #139913donaldduckmoore
ParticipantI think the owner is rich. The house was unoccupied since it was on sale a year ago, and it is still unoccupied today. It they really have good equity, then selling it earlier at a more reasonable but relatively higher price a year ago would save them a lot of money and time. Not my mentality.
January 21, 2008 at 2:50 PM #140128donaldduckmoore
ParticipantI think the owner is rich. The house was unoccupied since it was on sale a year ago, and it is still unoccupied today. It they really have good equity, then selling it earlier at a more reasonable but relatively higher price a year ago would save them a lot of money and time. Not my mentality.
January 21, 2008 at 2:50 PM #140150donaldduckmoore
ParticipantI think the owner is rich. The house was unoccupied since it was on sale a year ago, and it is still unoccupied today. It they really have good equity, then selling it earlier at a more reasonable but relatively higher price a year ago would save them a lot of money and time. Not my mentality.
January 21, 2008 at 2:50 PM #140177donaldduckmoore
ParticipantI think the owner is rich. The house was unoccupied since it was on sale a year ago, and it is still unoccupied today. It they really have good equity, then selling it earlier at a more reasonable but relatively higher price a year ago would save them a lot of money and time. Not my mentality.
January 21, 2008 at 2:50 PM #140224donaldduckmoore
ParticipantI think the owner is rich. The house was unoccupied since it was on sale a year ago, and it is still unoccupied today. It they really have good equity, then selling it earlier at a more reasonable but relatively higher price a year ago would save them a lot of money and time. Not my mentality.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
