Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Statistics
- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
waitingpatiently.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM #13329July 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM #240882
JustLurking
ParticipantAre you talking about this?
July 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM #241020ParticipantAre you talking about this?
July 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM #241083ParticipantAre you talking about this?
July 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM #241026ParticipantAre you talking about this?
July 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM #241079ParticipantAre you talking about this?
July 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM #241084XBoxBoy
ParticipantYou can also get the UT/Dataquick data at:
http://sdhomes.signonsandiego.com/area_homesales/pastyears-2008.php
You have to click through based on what part of the county you are trying to track to get individual zip codes.
Also, if anyone is interested, I’ve started a thread on SDLookup’s forums concerning differences between Dataquick’s numbers and other’s numbers for La Jolla.
But I’d welcome anyone who has the energy to check other zips numbers to join in too! I’m not much for conspiracy theories, but I find that Dataquick’s numbers are always higher than any body else. I’d love to hear any good explanations of why.
XBoxBoy
July 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM #241088ParticipantYou can also get the UT/Dataquick data at:
http://sdhomes.signonsandiego.com/area_homesales/pastyears-2008.php
You have to click through based on what part of the county you are trying to track to get individual zip codes.
Also, if anyone is interested, I’ve started a thread on SDLookup’s forums concerning differences between Dataquick’s numbers and other’s numbers for La Jolla.
But I’d welcome anyone who has the energy to check other zips numbers to join in too! I’m not much for conspiracy theories, but I find that Dataquick’s numbers are always higher than any body else. I’d love to hear any good explanations of why.
XBoxBoy
July 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM #241031ParticipantYou can also get the UT/Dataquick data at:
http://sdhomes.signonsandiego.com/area_homesales/pastyears-2008.php
You have to click through based on what part of the county you are trying to track to get individual zip codes.
Also, if anyone is interested, I’ve started a thread on SDLookup’s forums concerning differences between Dataquick’s numbers and other’s numbers for La Jolla.
But I’d welcome anyone who has the energy to check other zips numbers to join in too! I’m not much for conspiracy theories, but I find that Dataquick’s numbers are always higher than any body else. I’d love to hear any good explanations of why.
XBoxBoy
July 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM #241025ParticipantYou can also get the UT/Dataquick data at:
http://sdhomes.signonsandiego.com/area_homesales/pastyears-2008.php
You have to click through based on what part of the county you are trying to track to get individual zip codes.
Also, if anyone is interested, I’ve started a thread on SDLookup’s forums concerning differences between Dataquick’s numbers and other’s numbers for La Jolla.
But I’d welcome anyone who has the energy to check other zips numbers to join in too! I’m not much for conspiracy theories, but I find that Dataquick’s numbers are always higher than any body else. I’d love to hear any good explanations of why.
XBoxBoy
July 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM #240887ParticipantYou can also get the UT/Dataquick data at:
http://sdhomes.signonsandiego.com/area_homesales/pastyears-2008.php
You have to click through based on what part of the county you are trying to track to get individual zip codes.
Also, if anyone is interested, I’ve started a thread on SDLookup’s forums concerning differences between Dataquick’s numbers and other’s numbers for La Jolla.
But I’d welcome anyone who has the energy to check other zips numbers to join in too! I’m not much for conspiracy theories, but I find that Dataquick’s numbers are always higher than any body else. I’d love to hear any good explanations of why.
XBoxBoy
July 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM #240977Sandi Egan
Participant42.7% of all statistics is made up on the spot.
July 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM #241115Participant42.7% of all statistics is made up on the spot.
July 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM #241121Participant42.7% of all statistics is made up on the spot.
July 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM #241175Participant42.7% of all statistics is made up on the spot.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.