Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › State Budgets: Day of Reckoning
- This topic has 300 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 21, 2010 at 7:25 PM #644360December 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM #643261surveyorParticipant
[quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable.
I believe that the misallocation of resources in government is as much in salaries and pensions as in giveaway sweetheart deals to private contractors who pocket the profits.
The bankers’ excesses and bailouts went to a small number of people at the very top.[/quote]
One of the things you’ll learn when you start getting some experience in real estate investing (and when doing any business really) is that maintenance costs do not contribute much to your profit line.
If you have a property and choose to pay more in repair, maintenance, and other costs, it will not increase your profit margin. In fact, it will actually harm your property’s value because many lenders will look at your property and its costs and will conclude that you spend too much money on maintenance and other costs and will deem you a bad credit risk.
However, if you choose to make upgrades in your property (for example, adding another bedroom, or expanding the living room), these improvements will allow you to ask for more rent, and will possibly make you more profit.
Choosing to pay more in maintenance costs also lessens the amount of money available for capital improvements.
Try to think of government that way.
In case you can’t figure it out, pensions are a maintenance cost.
December 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM #643332surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable.
I believe that the misallocation of resources in government is as much in salaries and pensions as in giveaway sweetheart deals to private contractors who pocket the profits.
The bankers’ excesses and bailouts went to a small number of people at the very top.[/quote]
One of the things you’ll learn when you start getting some experience in real estate investing (and when doing any business really) is that maintenance costs do not contribute much to your profit line.
If you have a property and choose to pay more in repair, maintenance, and other costs, it will not increase your profit margin. In fact, it will actually harm your property’s value because many lenders will look at your property and its costs and will conclude that you spend too much money on maintenance and other costs and will deem you a bad credit risk.
However, if you choose to make upgrades in your property (for example, adding another bedroom, or expanding the living room), these improvements will allow you to ask for more rent, and will possibly make you more profit.
Choosing to pay more in maintenance costs also lessens the amount of money available for capital improvements.
Try to think of government that way.
In case you can’t figure it out, pensions are a maintenance cost.
December 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM #643913surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable.
I believe that the misallocation of resources in government is as much in salaries and pensions as in giveaway sweetheart deals to private contractors who pocket the profits.
The bankers’ excesses and bailouts went to a small number of people at the very top.[/quote]
One of the things you’ll learn when you start getting some experience in real estate investing (and when doing any business really) is that maintenance costs do not contribute much to your profit line.
If you have a property and choose to pay more in repair, maintenance, and other costs, it will not increase your profit margin. In fact, it will actually harm your property’s value because many lenders will look at your property and its costs and will conclude that you spend too much money on maintenance and other costs and will deem you a bad credit risk.
However, if you choose to make upgrades in your property (for example, adding another bedroom, or expanding the living room), these improvements will allow you to ask for more rent, and will possibly make you more profit.
Choosing to pay more in maintenance costs also lessens the amount of money available for capital improvements.
Try to think of government that way.
In case you can’t figure it out, pensions are a maintenance cost.
December 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM #644049surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable.
I believe that the misallocation of resources in government is as much in salaries and pensions as in giveaway sweetheart deals to private contractors who pocket the profits.
The bankers’ excesses and bailouts went to a small number of people at the very top.[/quote]
One of the things you’ll learn when you start getting some experience in real estate investing (and when doing any business really) is that maintenance costs do not contribute much to your profit line.
If you have a property and choose to pay more in repair, maintenance, and other costs, it will not increase your profit margin. In fact, it will actually harm your property’s value because many lenders will look at your property and its costs and will conclude that you spend too much money on maintenance and other costs and will deem you a bad credit risk.
However, if you choose to make upgrades in your property (for example, adding another bedroom, or expanding the living room), these improvements will allow you to ask for more rent, and will possibly make you more profit.
Choosing to pay more in maintenance costs also lessens the amount of money available for capital improvements.
Try to think of government that way.
In case you can’t figure it out, pensions are a maintenance cost.
December 21, 2010 at 7:36 PM #644370surveyorParticipant[quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable.
I believe that the misallocation of resources in government is as much in salaries and pensions as in giveaway sweetheart deals to private contractors who pocket the profits.
The bankers’ excesses and bailouts went to a small number of people at the very top.[/quote]
One of the things you’ll learn when you start getting some experience in real estate investing (and when doing any business really) is that maintenance costs do not contribute much to your profit line.
If you have a property and choose to pay more in repair, maintenance, and other costs, it will not increase your profit margin. In fact, it will actually harm your property’s value because many lenders will look at your property and its costs and will conclude that you spend too much money on maintenance and other costs and will deem you a bad credit risk.
However, if you choose to make upgrades in your property (for example, adding another bedroom, or expanding the living room), these improvements will allow you to ask for more rent, and will possibly make you more profit.
Choosing to pay more in maintenance costs also lessens the amount of money available for capital improvements.
Try to think of government that way.
In case you can’t figure it out, pensions are a maintenance cost.
December 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM #643266permabearParticipant[quote=paramount][quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable. [/quote]
Is this a sarcastic comment? All that spending on salaries and pensions has to come from somewhere.
And I’ll tell you where it comes from: people who produce.
For their lives to become more enjoyable someone else’s had to become inordinately less enjoyable.[/quote]
No, where it came from is tax cuts for the very very top elite few.Our country was most balanced, most productive, and most secure when we had top tax rates at the modern equivalent of $10M+ at 90%
December 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM #643337permabearParticipant[quote=paramount][quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable. [/quote]
Is this a sarcastic comment? All that spending on salaries and pensions has to come from somewhere.
And I’ll tell you where it comes from: people who produce.
For their lives to become more enjoyable someone else’s had to become inordinately less enjoyable.[/quote]
No, where it came from is tax cuts for the very very top elite few.Our country was most balanced, most productive, and most secure when we had top tax rates at the modern equivalent of $10M+ at 90%
December 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM #643918permabearParticipant[quote=paramount][quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable. [/quote]
Is this a sarcastic comment? All that spending on salaries and pensions has to come from somewhere.
And I’ll tell you where it comes from: people who produce.
For their lives to become more enjoyable someone else’s had to become inordinately less enjoyable.[/quote]
No, where it came from is tax cuts for the very very top elite few.Our country was most balanced, most productive, and most secure when we had top tax rates at the modern equivalent of $10M+ at 90%
December 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM #644054permabearParticipant[quote=paramount][quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable. [/quote]
Is this a sarcastic comment? All that spending on salaries and pensions has to come from somewhere.
And I’ll tell you where it comes from: people who produce.
For their lives to become more enjoyable someone else’s had to become inordinately less enjoyable.[/quote]
No, where it came from is tax cuts for the very very top elite few.Our country was most balanced, most productive, and most secure when we had top tax rates at the modern equivalent of $10M+ at 90%
December 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM #644375permabearParticipant[quote=paramount][quote=briansd1]Not to say that there wasn’t waste, but at least government spending on salaries and pensions went to millions of ordinary people so their lives could be more enjoyable. [/quote]
Is this a sarcastic comment? All that spending on salaries and pensions has to come from somewhere.
And I’ll tell you where it comes from: people who produce.
For their lives to become more enjoyable someone else’s had to become inordinately less enjoyable.[/quote]
No, where it came from is tax cuts for the very very top elite few.Our country was most balanced, most productive, and most secure when we had top tax rates at the modern equivalent of $10M+ at 90%
December 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM #643271Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
Ironically Joe Pisarcik ended up as a QB coach for my high school.[/quote]
Sdr: And a constant punchline for sportscasters since that day in the Meadowlands. I heard Bob Costas reference Pisarcik a few months back.
The Giants punter Dodge is going to join poor Joe in Meadowlands Hell.
I gotta believe you were screaming your head off in the last half of the 4th, right? I had a really bad inkling when Celek cruised in on a garbage play to make it 31 – 17. You cannot give Vick and Co. an inch, or they will gut you. Wouldn’t mind seeing Eggles and Falcons in the NFC Championship game.
December 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM #643342Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
Ironically Joe Pisarcik ended up as a QB coach for my high school.[/quote]
Sdr: And a constant punchline for sportscasters since that day in the Meadowlands. I heard Bob Costas reference Pisarcik a few months back.
The Giants punter Dodge is going to join poor Joe in Meadowlands Hell.
I gotta believe you were screaming your head off in the last half of the 4th, right? I had a really bad inkling when Celek cruised in on a garbage play to make it 31 – 17. You cannot give Vick and Co. an inch, or they will gut you. Wouldn’t mind seeing Eggles and Falcons in the NFC Championship game.
December 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM #643923Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
Ironically Joe Pisarcik ended up as a QB coach for my high school.[/quote]
Sdr: And a constant punchline for sportscasters since that day in the Meadowlands. I heard Bob Costas reference Pisarcik a few months back.
The Giants punter Dodge is going to join poor Joe in Meadowlands Hell.
I gotta believe you were screaming your head off in the last half of the 4th, right? I had a really bad inkling when Celek cruised in on a garbage play to make it 31 – 17. You cannot give Vick and Co. an inch, or they will gut you. Wouldn’t mind seeing Eggles and Falcons in the NFC Championship game.
December 21, 2010 at 7:51 PM #644059Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
Ironically Joe Pisarcik ended up as a QB coach for my high school.[/quote]
Sdr: And a constant punchline for sportscasters since that day in the Meadowlands. I heard Bob Costas reference Pisarcik a few months back.
The Giants punter Dodge is going to join poor Joe in Meadowlands Hell.
I gotta believe you were screaming your head off in the last half of the 4th, right? I had a really bad inkling when Celek cruised in on a garbage play to make it 31 – 17. You cannot give Vick and Co. an inch, or they will gut you. Wouldn’t mind seeing Eggles and Falcons in the NFC Championship game.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.