Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › State Budgets: Day of Reckoning
- This topic has 300 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 12 months ago by outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM #646297December 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM #645297DjshakesParticipant
They won’t dump him because who knows if they will even be in SD in after next year. If they move to LA the new owners may want to start on a clean slate and not deal with new existing contracts. I don’t know how long his contract is for but this is what I have heard people mention on the street. How credible it is, I have no clue nor do I care. Go GB!
December 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM #645368DjshakesParticipantThey won’t dump him because who knows if they will even be in SD in after next year. If they move to LA the new owners may want to start on a clean slate and not deal with new existing contracts. I don’t know how long his contract is for but this is what I have heard people mention on the street. How credible it is, I have no clue nor do I care. Go GB!
December 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM #645949DjshakesParticipantThey won’t dump him because who knows if they will even be in SD in after next year. If they move to LA the new owners may want to start on a clean slate and not deal with new existing contracts. I don’t know how long his contract is for but this is what I have heard people mention on the street. How credible it is, I have no clue nor do I care. Go GB!
December 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM #646088DjshakesParticipantThey won’t dump him because who knows if they will even be in SD in after next year. If they move to LA the new owners may want to start on a clean slate and not deal with new existing contracts. I don’t know how long his contract is for but this is what I have heard people mention on the street. How credible it is, I have no clue nor do I care. Go GB!
December 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM #646413DjshakesParticipantThey won’t dump him because who knows if they will even be in SD in after next year. If they move to LA the new owners may want to start on a clean slate and not deal with new existing contracts. I don’t know how long his contract is for but this is what I have heard people mention on the street. How credible it is, I have no clue nor do I care. Go GB!
December 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM #645590Allan from FallbrookParticipantApparently, rumors of Norv Turner’s demise have been greatly exaggerated: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4837855
The 2013 date is also intriguing, in light of the various whispers about a possible Chargers return to LA. This date would take the organization past any potential lockout, as well as past the supposed 2011/2012 move to the Coliseum.
December 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM #645662Allan from FallbrookParticipantApparently, rumors of Norv Turner’s demise have been greatly exaggerated: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4837855
The 2013 date is also intriguing, in light of the various whispers about a possible Chargers return to LA. This date would take the organization past any potential lockout, as well as past the supposed 2011/2012 move to the Coliseum.
December 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM #646244Allan from FallbrookParticipantApparently, rumors of Norv Turner’s demise have been greatly exaggerated: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4837855
The 2013 date is also intriguing, in light of the various whispers about a possible Chargers return to LA. This date would take the organization past any potential lockout, as well as past the supposed 2011/2012 move to the Coliseum.
December 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM #646383Allan from FallbrookParticipantApparently, rumors of Norv Turner’s demise have been greatly exaggerated: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4837855
The 2013 date is also intriguing, in light of the various whispers about a possible Chargers return to LA. This date would take the organization past any potential lockout, as well as past the supposed 2011/2012 move to the Coliseum.
December 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM #646709Allan from FallbrookParticipantApparently, rumors of Norv Turner’s demise have been greatly exaggerated: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4837855
The 2013 date is also intriguing, in light of the various whispers about a possible Chargers return to LA. This date would take the organization past any potential lockout, as well as past the supposed 2011/2012 move to the Coliseum.
December 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM #645649outtamojoParticipantHighest-paid UC execs demand millions in benefits
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/29/MNDC1GUSCT.DTLDecember 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM #645722outtamojoParticipantHighest-paid UC execs demand millions in benefits
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/29/MNDC1GUSCT.DTLDecember 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM #646305outtamojoParticipantHighest-paid UC execs demand millions in benefits
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/29/MNDC1GUSCT.DTLDecember 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM #646444outtamojoParticipantHighest-paid UC execs demand millions in benefits
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/29/MNDC1GUSCT.DTL -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.