Squatters in Murrieta

[mydogsarelazy]

Hi Piggs,

Here in my neighborhood in Murrieta we have squatters. On a nearby street a family moved out 20 months ago and told some relatives they could use the house until the bank took it over. Now, more than a year and a half later they are still there and the bank hasn’t lifted a finger.

On our street speculators are in default on a nearby house, but they continue to rent it out. I wonder how long that will go on.

These are some of the unintended consequences of foreclosure moratoriums and the hesitation by banks to foreclose. We would like to see these homes sold and owner occupied, but it may be a long time until that happens.

JS

[UCGal]

It’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.

In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.

Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.

Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.

[UCGal]

It’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.

In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.

Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.

Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.

[UCGal]

It’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.

In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.

Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.

Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.

[UCGal]

It’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.

In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.

Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.

Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.

[UCGal]

It’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.

In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.

Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.

Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.

[Arraya]

With the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.

[Arraya]

With the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.

[Arraya]

With the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.

[Arraya]

With the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.

[Arraya]

With the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.

[AK]

Given lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.

[AK]

Given lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.

[AK]

Given lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.

[AK]

Given lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.

[Author]

Posts