- This topic has 1,305 replies, 59 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by 34f3f3f.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 14, 2009 at 8:10 PM #366737March 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM #366143NotCrankyParticipant
Yep, I have pitched myself once or twice, in a very direct manner and you tried to kill me for it so O.K. next?
The rest of your post is not in keeping with the fun we have been having here.
March 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM #366431NotCrankyParticipantYep, I have pitched myself once or twice, in a very direct manner and you tried to kill me for it so O.K. next?
The rest of your post is not in keeping with the fun we have been having here.
March 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM #366596NotCrankyParticipantYep, I have pitched myself once or twice, in a very direct manner and you tried to kill me for it so O.K. next?
The rest of your post is not in keeping with the fun we have been having here.
March 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM #366631NotCrankyParticipantYep, I have pitched myself once or twice, in a very direct manner and you tried to kill me for it so O.K. next?
The rest of your post is not in keeping with the fun we have been having here.
March 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM #366742NotCrankyParticipantYep, I have pitched myself once or twice, in a very direct manner and you tried to kill me for it so O.K. next?
The rest of your post is not in keeping with the fun we have been having here.
March 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM #366163SD RealtorParticipantRus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do.
March 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM #366451SD RealtorParticipantRus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do.
March 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM #366615SD RealtorParticipantRus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do.
March 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM #366651SD RealtorParticipantRus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do.
March 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM #366762SD RealtorParticipantRus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do.
March 14, 2009 at 9:22 PM #366168NotCrankyParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Rus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do. [/quote]
Thanks SDR for clearing all that up. Wow I was wrong about you rrelationship with Jim that’s serious indeed?You are making a lot of things up.I think you are going off the deep end about the thing with Rich.I think he let it go? I hope he did. I just let the record stand for itself there. Feel free to bring it up. You said Peter and I were scared about the market so you got back from me that I think the stakes are higher for you than for me.You are really running wild with this stuff. Breathe man.
http://piggington.com/short_sale_dealings_in_encinitas_jerrilynn
sdr I guess the virtual elbow to SDR’s eye gave me the idea you were clamoring. Excuse me if it is not correct. I think this woman might think I brought value to this blog ;)Maybe she bought with one of you guys, Well, can’t blame me for trying to save her.
March 14, 2009 at 9:22 PM #366456NotCrankyParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Rus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do. [/quote]
Thanks SDR for clearing all that up. Wow I was wrong about you rrelationship with Jim that’s serious indeed?You are making a lot of things up.I think you are going off the deep end about the thing with Rich.I think he let it go? I hope he did. I just let the record stand for itself there. Feel free to bring it up. You said Peter and I were scared about the market so you got back from me that I think the stakes are higher for you than for me.You are really running wild with this stuff. Breathe man.
http://piggington.com/short_sale_dealings_in_encinitas_jerrilynn
sdr I guess the virtual elbow to SDR’s eye gave me the idea you were clamoring. Excuse me if it is not correct. I think this woman might think I brought value to this blog ;)Maybe she bought with one of you guys, Well, can’t blame me for trying to save her.
March 14, 2009 at 9:22 PM #366621NotCrankyParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Rus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do. [/quote]
Thanks SDR for clearing all that up. Wow I was wrong about you rrelationship with Jim that’s serious indeed?You are making a lot of things up.I think you are going off the deep end about the thing with Rich.I think he let it go? I hope he did. I just let the record stand for itself there. Feel free to bring it up. You said Peter and I were scared about the market so you got back from me that I think the stakes are higher for you than for me.You are really running wild with this stuff. Breathe man.
http://piggington.com/short_sale_dealings_in_encinitas_jerrilynn
sdr I guess the virtual elbow to SDR’s eye gave me the idea you were clamoring. Excuse me if it is not correct. I think this woman might think I brought value to this blog ;)Maybe she bought with one of you guys, Well, can’t blame me for trying to save her.
March 14, 2009 at 9:22 PM #366656NotCrankyParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Rus nothing is wrong with working with Jim Klinge. I think the world of Jim and he is quite successful.
I just sent you the email you sent me in March of 2008. The point I was making was that somehow in your world, and don’t ask me how, you made some incorrect assumption that I had partnered up with Jim.
It is just an illustration of how you have taken something, don’t ask me what, to form a completely incoherent conclusion. At least you had the discretion to cast that dispersion in a private manner.
Again, all I am trying to say is that you are the one making all these assumptions. You are the one who has posted how you “important” you think real estate is to me. Don’t hide behind your “contrarian” point of view Rus. You have made illusions to Rich and me having some sort of business deal, you have made a reference to me relying solely on real estate in this very thread. Then you go and laugh it off and make statements about not being serious.
You can keep doing whatever you want to do. [/quote]
Thanks SDR for clearing all that up. Wow I was wrong about you rrelationship with Jim that’s serious indeed?You are making a lot of things up.I think you are going off the deep end about the thing with Rich.I think he let it go? I hope he did. I just let the record stand for itself there. Feel free to bring it up. You said Peter and I were scared about the market so you got back from me that I think the stakes are higher for you than for me.You are really running wild with this stuff. Breathe man.
http://piggington.com/short_sale_dealings_in_encinitas_jerrilynn
sdr I guess the virtual elbow to SDR’s eye gave me the idea you were clamoring. Excuse me if it is not correct. I think this woman might think I brought value to this blog ;)Maybe she bought with one of you guys, Well, can’t blame me for trying to save her.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.