- This topic has 110 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM #362169March 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM #361440kewpParticipant
[quote=Casca]We already have a full employment act for people with no abilities. It’s called government.[/quote]
Government employees defeated the Nazi’s in Europe and put a man on the moon.
The moon thing was done for less money than Goldman Sachs lost last year, I’ll add.
Whats on your resume?
March 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM #361736kewpParticipant[quote=Casca]We already have a full employment act for people with no abilities. It’s called government.[/quote]
Government employees defeated the Nazi’s in Europe and put a man on the moon.
The moon thing was done for less money than Goldman Sachs lost last year, I’ll add.
Whats on your resume?
March 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM #361879kewpParticipant[quote=Casca]We already have a full employment act for people with no abilities. It’s called government.[/quote]
Government employees defeated the Nazi’s in Europe and put a man on the moon.
The moon thing was done for less money than Goldman Sachs lost last year, I’ll add.
Whats on your resume?
March 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM #361921kewpParticipant[quote=Casca]We already have a full employment act for people with no abilities. It’s called government.[/quote]
Government employees defeated the Nazi’s in Europe and put a man on the moon.
The moon thing was done for less money than Goldman Sachs lost last year, I’ll add.
Whats on your resume?
March 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM #362028kewpParticipant[quote=Casca]We already have a full employment act for people with no abilities. It’s called government.[/quote]
Government employees defeated the Nazi’s in Europe and put a man on the moon.
The moon thing was done for less money than Goldman Sachs lost last year, I’ll add.
Whats on your resume?
March 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM #361585sdrealtorParticipantGuys, grammatically the only proper way to use TO and functional in the same sentence is to apply dys to front end of the later.
March 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM #361881sdrealtorParticipantGuys, grammatically the only proper way to use TO and functional in the same sentence is to apply dys to front end of the later.
March 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM #362024sdrealtorParticipantGuys, grammatically the only proper way to use TO and functional in the same sentence is to apply dys to front end of the later.
March 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM #362066sdrealtorParticipantGuys, grammatically the only proper way to use TO and functional in the same sentence is to apply dys to front end of the later.
March 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM #362174sdrealtorParticipantGuys, grammatically the only proper way to use TO and functional in the same sentence is to apply dys to front end of the later.
March 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM #361614SD RealtorParticipantSorry about that allan… I did have to laugh out loud at your post though… Ya know the raiders have had the past couple of seasons where they finished strong. That win at TB last year at the end was pretty cool. They could have easily packed it in.
It is such a shame to waste the defense that they have had the past few years.
TO is just an enigma… Physically the guy is a specimen… Look compare him to say Marvin Harrison right now. Marvin is a class guy but is pretty broken down. At 14 years in the league TO is pretty darn near top shape…The only bad thing I can think of “on the field” is that he has been dropping more balls.
However you cannot deny that they guy does cause the defense to have to rotate someone on top over him. I am a little surprised the Giants didn’t go after him after they dropped Plax but thier coach doesn’t put up with sht so good for him.
March 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM #361910SD RealtorParticipantSorry about that allan… I did have to laugh out loud at your post though… Ya know the raiders have had the past couple of seasons where they finished strong. That win at TB last year at the end was pretty cool. They could have easily packed it in.
It is such a shame to waste the defense that they have had the past few years.
TO is just an enigma… Physically the guy is a specimen… Look compare him to say Marvin Harrison right now. Marvin is a class guy but is pretty broken down. At 14 years in the league TO is pretty darn near top shape…The only bad thing I can think of “on the field” is that he has been dropping more balls.
However you cannot deny that they guy does cause the defense to have to rotate someone on top over him. I am a little surprised the Giants didn’t go after him after they dropped Plax but thier coach doesn’t put up with sht so good for him.
March 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM #362053SD RealtorParticipantSorry about that allan… I did have to laugh out loud at your post though… Ya know the raiders have had the past couple of seasons where they finished strong. That win at TB last year at the end was pretty cool. They could have easily packed it in.
It is such a shame to waste the defense that they have had the past few years.
TO is just an enigma… Physically the guy is a specimen… Look compare him to say Marvin Harrison right now. Marvin is a class guy but is pretty broken down. At 14 years in the league TO is pretty darn near top shape…The only bad thing I can think of “on the field” is that he has been dropping more balls.
However you cannot deny that they guy does cause the defense to have to rotate someone on top over him. I am a little surprised the Giants didn’t go after him after they dropped Plax but thier coach doesn’t put up with sht so good for him.
March 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM #362096SD RealtorParticipantSorry about that allan… I did have to laugh out loud at your post though… Ya know the raiders have had the past couple of seasons where they finished strong. That win at TB last year at the end was pretty cool. They could have easily packed it in.
It is such a shame to waste the defense that they have had the past few years.
TO is just an enigma… Physically the guy is a specimen… Look compare him to say Marvin Harrison right now. Marvin is a class guy but is pretty broken down. At 14 years in the league TO is pretty darn near top shape…The only bad thing I can think of “on the field” is that he has been dropping more balls.
However you cannot deny that they guy does cause the defense to have to rotate someone on top over him. I am a little surprised the Giants didn’t go after him after they dropped Plax but thier coach doesn’t put up with sht so good for him.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.