- This topic has 480 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM #385742April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385150DWCAPParticipant
In my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385419DWCAPParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385616DWCAPParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385664DWCAPParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385802DWCAPParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385155DWCAPParticipantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385424DWCAPParticipantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385621DWCAPParticipantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385669DWCAPParticipantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385808DWCAPParticipantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385235jpinpbParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385503jpinpbParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385701jpinpbParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385749jpinpbParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.