- This topic has 480 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM #385742April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385150
DWCAP
ParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385419DWCAP
ParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385616DWCAP
ParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385664DWCAP
ParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM #385802DWCAP
ParticipantIn my head it was six months supply is considered normal, but that is +/- 1 month. If it were a normal market it wouldnt be unusal to see 5 month supply’s in the spring rush and 7 month supplys in the fall slowing before properties that didnt sell delist for the winter. But this is just what I have in my head and could be totally wrong.
AN, another way to think about it is that MM is one of the most manipulated markets right now, and months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong.
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385155DWCAP
Participantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385424DWCAP
Participantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385621DWCAP
Participantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385669DWCAP
Participantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 1:44 PM #385808DWCAP
Participantlet me cavat that,
not saying AN is wrong, just that months of supply is one of those indicators that can swing wildly. Wasnt months of supply in the height of the bubble, 2004, like 3 weeks?
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385235jpinpb
ParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385503jpinpb
ParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385701jpinpb
ParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
April 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM #385749jpinpb
ParticipantDWCAP – Thanks. That’ll be my mantra for a while: “months of supply as a stand alone indicator in a highly manipulated market can often be totally wrong”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
