So what the hell do we do?!

[Chris Scoreboard Johnston]

We are about to begin another big leg down in most markets, when that happens the hyperinflation scare that the gold sellers are trying to create will take a back seat to deflation again for awhile. You will have time to make this decision. The government is trying very hard to hold things up and who could blame them. However, eventually when large fund liquidations begin, this wave will get going on the downside and even the PPT won’t be able to stop it. I am not sure if Gold will come way down or not, but at the very best it will go sideways.

I did hear on the radio today that two consecutive closes in Gold over 981 will result in an immediate move to 1200 by Joe Batalia. So I guess you could go to Gold Line and pay 1275 for Gold there with the 30% premium over spot for commissions and handling etc.. That way if it holds during the down cycle you will have only lost 30%, sounds like a good investment to me.

[patientrenter]

Chris, you have a lot more expertise in equity markets than I do, and you’ve made a couple of smart calls, so I listen carefully when you give advice to the fellow Piggs.

I have to admit I am dumbfounded by the rise in equity markets since March. They appear to be levitating well above the underlying economics.

But I am curious. What do you think of the argument, made by Paul Krugman and others, that the world is still awash in excess savings? If that were true, couldn’t that lead to equity values well above what they “should” be based on traditional measures of fundamental value, together with very low interest rates? I am not trying to start a tired endless debate here. I am just curious what you think.

[patientrenter]

Chris, you have a lot more expertise in equity markets than I do, and you’ve made a couple of smart calls, so I listen carefully when you give advice to the fellow Piggs.

I have to admit I am dumbfounded by the rise in equity markets since March. They appear to be levitating well above the underlying economics.

But I am curious. What do you think of the argument, made by Paul Krugman and others, that the world is still awash in excess savings? If that were true, couldn’t that lead to equity values well above what they “should” be based on traditional measures of fundamental value, together with very low interest rates? I am not trying to start a tired endless debate here. I am just curious what you think.

[patientrenter]

Chris, you have a lot more expertise in equity markets than I do, and you’ve made a couple of smart calls, so I listen carefully when you give advice to the fellow Piggs.

I have to admit I am dumbfounded by the rise in equity markets since March. They appear to be levitating well above the underlying economics.

But I am curious. What do you think of the argument, made by Paul Krugman and others, that the world is still awash in excess savings? If that were true, couldn’t that lead to equity values well above what they “should” be based on traditional measures of fundamental value, together with very low interest rates? I am not trying to start a tired endless debate here. I am just curious what you think.

[patientrenter]

Chris, you have a lot more expertise in equity markets than I do, and you’ve made a couple of smart calls, so I listen carefully when you give advice to the fellow Piggs.

I have to admit I am dumbfounded by the rise in equity markets since March. They appear to be levitating well above the underlying economics.

But I am curious. What do you think of the argument, made by Paul Krugman and others, that the world is still awash in excess savings? If that were true, couldn’t that lead to equity values well above what they “should” be based on traditional measures of fundamental value, together with very low interest rates? I am not trying to start a tired endless debate here. I am just curious what you think.

[patientrenter]

Chris, you have a lot more expertise in equity markets than I do, and you’ve made a couple of smart calls, so I listen carefully when you give advice to the fellow Piggs.

I have to admit I am dumbfounded by the rise in equity markets since March. They appear to be levitating well above the underlying economics.

But I am curious. What do you think of the argument, made by Paul Krugman and others, that the world is still awash in excess savings? If that were true, couldn’t that lead to equity values well above what they “should” be based on traditional measures of fundamental value, together with very low interest rates? I am not trying to start a tired endless debate here. I am just curious what you think.

[JACKQLYN]

I couldn’t have put it better nostradamus

[JACKQLYN]

I couldn’t have put it better nostradamus

[JACKQLYN]

I couldn’t have put it better nostradamus

[JACKQLYN]

I couldn’t have put it better nostradamus

[JACKQLYN]

I couldn’t have put it better nostradamus

[paramount]

Have a spiritual plan and the financial plan will fall in place.

[paramount]

Have a spiritual plan and the financial plan will fall in place.

[paramount]

Have a spiritual plan and the financial plan will fall in place.

[paramount]

Have a spiritual plan and the financial plan will fall in place.

[Author]

Posts