- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by .
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Such a bold display of confidence in the face of empirical evidence to the contrary. Is it possible that Easy Al is “moonlighting” at NASA?
Such a bold display of confidence in the face of empirical evidence to the contrary. Is it possible that Easy Al is “moonlighting” at NASA?
Such a bold display of confidence in the face of empirical evidence to the contrary. Is it possible that Easy Al is “moonlighting” at NASA?
Is it possible
It was remarked by someone after the Columbia crash investigation that NASA culture has changed over time from "Can Do" to "Can't Fail". If I were a shuttle engineer/manager, I would be quaking in my boots at the thought of hurtling down at 3000 degree C with a gash in the shield. At least, I can't do that with a (known) gash in my tire on a freeway!
Is it possible
It was remarked by someone after the Columbia crash investigation that NASA culture has changed over time from "Can Do" to "Can't Fail". If I were a shuttle engineer/manager, I would be quaking in my boots at the thought of hurtling down at 3000 degree C with a gash in the shield. At least, I can't do that with a (known) gash in my tire on a freeway!
Is it possible
It was remarked by someone after the Columbia crash investigation that NASA culture has changed over time from "Can Do" to "Can't Fail". If I were a shuttle engineer/manager, I would be quaking in my boots at the thought of hurtling down at 3000 degree C with a gash in the shield. At least, I can't do that with a (known) gash in my tire on a freeway!