- This topic has 175 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM #237972July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM #237775
Peace
ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM #237909ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM #237916ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM #237965ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM #237976ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM #237790ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM #237924ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM #237931ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM #237980ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM #237991ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:33 PM #237796jficquette
Participant[quote=Peace]Allan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
[/quote]
9/11 couldn’t have happened had Clinton taken Laden in to custody when the Sudan offered him to us.
Clinton only met with the CIA director once the entire 8 years he was in office. He was notorious in his lack of regards for foreign policy. He was also notorious for his work habits, sleeping late, being late to meetings, disorganized etc.
Clinton got elected twice with less then 50% of the vote. His VP couldn’t get elected, his wife couldn’t get elected. Master politician? Hell no. Master Joke is more like it.
Clinton hasn’t done squat except get elected. Check out Arkansas, he left them at number 48-50 in everything.
Anyone who thinks Clinton did a good job is simply misinformed.
John
July 11, 2008 at 4:33 PM #237929Participant[quote=Peace]Allan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
[/quote]
9/11 couldn’t have happened had Clinton taken Laden in to custody when the Sudan offered him to us.
Clinton only met with the CIA director once the entire 8 years he was in office. He was notorious in his lack of regards for foreign policy. He was also notorious for his work habits, sleeping late, being late to meetings, disorganized etc.
Clinton got elected twice with less then 50% of the vote. His VP couldn’t get elected, his wife couldn’t get elected. Master politician? Hell no. Master Joke is more like it.
Clinton hasn’t done squat except get elected. Check out Arkansas, he left them at number 48-50 in everything.
Anyone who thinks Clinton did a good job is simply misinformed.
John
July 11, 2008 at 4:33 PM #237936Participant[quote=Peace]Allan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
[/quote]
9/11 couldn’t have happened had Clinton taken Laden in to custody when the Sudan offered him to us.
Clinton only met with the CIA director once the entire 8 years he was in office. He was notorious in his lack of regards for foreign policy. He was also notorious for his work habits, sleeping late, being late to meetings, disorganized etc.
Clinton got elected twice with less then 50% of the vote. His VP couldn’t get elected, his wife couldn’t get elected. Master politician? Hell no. Master Joke is more like it.
Clinton hasn’t done squat except get elected. Check out Arkansas, he left them at number 48-50 in everything.
Anyone who thinks Clinton did a good job is simply misinformed.
John
July 11, 2008 at 4:33 PM #237985Participant[quote=Peace]Allan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
[/quote]
9/11 couldn’t have happened had Clinton taken Laden in to custody when the Sudan offered him to us.
Clinton only met with the CIA director once the entire 8 years he was in office. He was notorious in his lack of regards for foreign policy. He was also notorious for his work habits, sleeping late, being late to meetings, disorganized etc.
Clinton got elected twice with less then 50% of the vote. His VP couldn’t get elected, his wife couldn’t get elected. Master politician? Hell no. Master Joke is more like it.
Clinton hasn’t done squat except get elected. Check out Arkansas, he left them at number 48-50 in everything.
Anyone who thinks Clinton did a good job is simply misinformed.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.