- This topic has 290 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by Ex-SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 15, 2008 at 8:55 AM #316143December 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM #315683afx114Participant
It’s hilarious. What surprised me is that Bush continued standing there and the shoe thrower wasn’t shot. You’d think that the Secret Service would have whisked Bush away to an undisclosed location until they could figure out what the hell was going on. I mean, what if it was a shoe bomb? Clearly the Bush admin has expertise when it comes to shoe bombs. It seems as if he is such a lame duck that the Secret Service won’t even take a shoe for him anymore.
December 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM #316037afx114ParticipantIt’s hilarious. What surprised me is that Bush continued standing there and the shoe thrower wasn’t shot. You’d think that the Secret Service would have whisked Bush away to an undisclosed location until they could figure out what the hell was going on. I mean, what if it was a shoe bomb? Clearly the Bush admin has expertise when it comes to shoe bombs. It seems as if he is such a lame duck that the Secret Service won’t even take a shoe for him anymore.
December 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM #316075afx114ParticipantIt’s hilarious. What surprised me is that Bush continued standing there and the shoe thrower wasn’t shot. You’d think that the Secret Service would have whisked Bush away to an undisclosed location until they could figure out what the hell was going on. I mean, what if it was a shoe bomb? Clearly the Bush admin has expertise when it comes to shoe bombs. It seems as if he is such a lame duck that the Secret Service won’t even take a shoe for him anymore.
December 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM #316096afx114ParticipantIt’s hilarious. What surprised me is that Bush continued standing there and the shoe thrower wasn’t shot. You’d think that the Secret Service would have whisked Bush away to an undisclosed location until they could figure out what the hell was going on. I mean, what if it was a shoe bomb? Clearly the Bush admin has expertise when it comes to shoe bombs. It seems as if he is such a lame duck that the Secret Service won’t even take a shoe for him anymore.
December 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM #316168afx114ParticipantIt’s hilarious. What surprised me is that Bush continued standing there and the shoe thrower wasn’t shot. You’d think that the Secret Service would have whisked Bush away to an undisclosed location until they could figure out what the hell was going on. I mean, what if it was a shoe bomb? Clearly the Bush admin has expertise when it comes to shoe bombs. It seems as if he is such a lame duck that the Secret Service won’t even take a shoe for him anymore.
December 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #315708pencilneckParticipantI enjoyed the Yahoo News article on the incident that put the shoe throwing into a cultural context (lest we misinterpret it?). Apparently in Arabic culture throwing shoes at someone is a sign of disrespect.
December 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #316062pencilneckParticipantI enjoyed the Yahoo News article on the incident that put the shoe throwing into a cultural context (lest we misinterpret it?). Apparently in Arabic culture throwing shoes at someone is a sign of disrespect.
December 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #316100pencilneckParticipantI enjoyed the Yahoo News article on the incident that put the shoe throwing into a cultural context (lest we misinterpret it?). Apparently in Arabic culture throwing shoes at someone is a sign of disrespect.
December 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #316121pencilneckParticipantI enjoyed the Yahoo News article on the incident that put the shoe throwing into a cultural context (lest we misinterpret it?). Apparently in Arabic culture throwing shoes at someone is a sign of disrespect.
December 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM #316194pencilneckParticipantI enjoyed the Yahoo News article on the incident that put the shoe throwing into a cultural context (lest we misinterpret it?). Apparently in Arabic culture throwing shoes at someone is a sign of disrespect.
December 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM #31571834f3f3fParticipantHere’s a link with a bit of follow reporting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY5U3Yp4tKIDecember 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM #31607234f3f3fParticipantHere’s a link with a bit of follow reporting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY5U3Yp4tKIDecember 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM #31611034f3f3fParticipantHere’s a link with a bit of follow reporting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY5U3Yp4tKIDecember 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM #31613134f3f3fParticipantHere’s a link with a bit of follow reporting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY5U3Yp4tKI -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.