- This topic has 315 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 31, 2007 at 4:40 PM #11372December 31, 2007 at 5:46 PM #127036
bsrsharma
ParticipantThe good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation. Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
December 31, 2007 at 5:46 PM #127198bsrsharma
ParticipantThe good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation. Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
December 31, 2007 at 5:46 PM #127207bsrsharma
ParticipantThe good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation. Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
December 31, 2007 at 5:46 PM #127275bsrsharma
ParticipantThe good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation. Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
December 31, 2007 at 5:46 PM #127299bsrsharma
ParticipantThe good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation. Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
December 31, 2007 at 6:24 PM #127053cr
ParticipantAt that point though, won’t Ben be forced to raise rates?
He’s going to have to sometime. And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
December 31, 2007 at 6:24 PM #127213cr
ParticipantAt that point though, won’t Ben be forced to raise rates?
He’s going to have to sometime. And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
December 31, 2007 at 6:24 PM #127222cr
ParticipantAt that point though, won’t Ben be forced to raise rates?
He’s going to have to sometime. And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
December 31, 2007 at 6:24 PM #127290cr
ParticipantAt that point though, won’t Ben be forced to raise rates?
He’s going to have to sometime. And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
December 31, 2007 at 6:24 PM #127314cr
ParticipantAt that point though, won’t Ben be forced to raise rates?
He’s going to have to sometime. And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
December 31, 2007 at 10:02 PM #127091Eugene
ParticipantI don’t see any mention of an economy-wide deflationary spiral. He’s merely predicting a Japanese-style slump in house prices (sustained declines for 5+ years).
The good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation.
Agreed. Nationwide deflation is the boogeyman of modern economics. As long as we have an academic like Helicopter Ben in charge of the Fed, he will do everything in his power to prevent it. Repo’s on funny paper aren’t even necessary. You’ll find out what he’s really going to do if you read his speech that gave him his nickname. (The fact that it’s an election year makes this strategy very likely)
All you need is to prop up consumer spending somehow. Main deflationary risk right now is that people might choose to reduce discretionary spending and it would hurt prices of nontradables and services. Falling dollar is good because it puts more dollars in the hands of workers of exporting industries. Tax cuts or bailouts will work toward this end too.
Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
Inflation will kick in regardless of perception whether the US$ is valuable. This is a complex issue, anyway. It’s not enough to think that the US $ is valuable. You also need a good valuable alternative.
And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
Inflation indexes include three broad categories of goods/services – non-discretionary tradable goods (milk, wheat, oil), discretionary tradable goods (cars, electronics, apparel), and nontradables (hotels, car insurance, restaurants). U.S. economy is 70% third category. Consumer retrenchment will not lead to consumers cutting down on milk. It will mean that more people stop travelling, buying car insurance and eating in restaurants. Thus decreasing prices of restaurant meals and hotel rooms, leaving some fraction of people in the restaurant and hotel business unemployed. Thus further lowering the amount of money available for discretionary spending. That’s the kind of deflation everyone is afraid of.
December 31, 2007 at 10:02 PM #127252Eugene
ParticipantI don’t see any mention of an economy-wide deflationary spiral. He’s merely predicting a Japanese-style slump in house prices (sustained declines for 5+ years).
The good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation.
Agreed. Nationwide deflation is the boogeyman of modern economics. As long as we have an academic like Helicopter Ben in charge of the Fed, he will do everything in his power to prevent it. Repo’s on funny paper aren’t even necessary. You’ll find out what he’s really going to do if you read his speech that gave him his nickname. (The fact that it’s an election year makes this strategy very likely)
All you need is to prop up consumer spending somehow. Main deflationary risk right now is that people might choose to reduce discretionary spending and it would hurt prices of nontradables and services. Falling dollar is good because it puts more dollars in the hands of workers of exporting industries. Tax cuts or bailouts will work toward this end too.
Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
Inflation will kick in regardless of perception whether the US$ is valuable. This is a complex issue, anyway. It’s not enough to think that the US $ is valuable. You also need a good valuable alternative.
And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
Inflation indexes include three broad categories of goods/services – non-discretionary tradable goods (milk, wheat, oil), discretionary tradable goods (cars, electronics, apparel), and nontradables (hotels, car insurance, restaurants). U.S. economy is 70% third category. Consumer retrenchment will not lead to consumers cutting down on milk. It will mean that more people stop travelling, buying car insurance and eating in restaurants. Thus decreasing prices of restaurant meals and hotel rooms, leaving some fraction of people in the restaurant and hotel business unemployed. Thus further lowering the amount of money available for discretionary spending. That’s the kind of deflation everyone is afraid of.
December 31, 2007 at 10:02 PM #127261Eugene
ParticipantI don’t see any mention of an economy-wide deflationary spiral. He’s merely predicting a Japanese-style slump in house prices (sustained declines for 5+ years).
The good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation.
Agreed. Nationwide deflation is the boogeyman of modern economics. As long as we have an academic like Helicopter Ben in charge of the Fed, he will do everything in his power to prevent it. Repo’s on funny paper aren’t even necessary. You’ll find out what he’s really going to do if you read his speech that gave him his nickname. (The fact that it’s an election year makes this strategy very likely)
All you need is to prop up consumer spending somehow. Main deflationary risk right now is that people might choose to reduce discretionary spending and it would hurt prices of nontradables and services. Falling dollar is good because it puts more dollars in the hands of workers of exporting industries. Tax cuts or bailouts will work toward this end too.
Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
Inflation will kick in regardless of perception whether the US$ is valuable. This is a complex issue, anyway. It’s not enough to think that the US $ is valuable. You also need a good valuable alternative.
And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
Inflation indexes include three broad categories of goods/services – non-discretionary tradable goods (milk, wheat, oil), discretionary tradable goods (cars, electronics, apparel), and nontradables (hotels, car insurance, restaurants). U.S. economy is 70% third category. Consumer retrenchment will not lead to consumers cutting down on milk. It will mean that more people stop travelling, buying car insurance and eating in restaurants. Thus decreasing prices of restaurant meals and hotel rooms, leaving some fraction of people in the restaurant and hotel business unemployed. Thus further lowering the amount of money available for discretionary spending. That’s the kind of deflation everyone is afraid of.
December 31, 2007 at 10:02 PM #127330Eugene
ParticipantI don’t see any mention of an economy-wide deflationary spiral. He’s merely predicting a Japanese-style slump in house prices (sustained declines for 5+ years).
The good Professor is a smart man; but with Helicopter Ben in charge of FED, How can there be a sustained deflationary spiral? If Ben sets the FEDs rate to near zero and issues long term repo’s on funny paper, I can’t see how there can be deflation.
Agreed. Nationwide deflation is the boogeyman of modern economics. As long as we have an academic like Helicopter Ben in charge of the Fed, he will do everything in his power to prevent it. Repo’s on funny paper aren’t even necessary. You’ll find out what he’s really going to do if you read his speech that gave him his nickname. (The fact that it’s an election year makes this strategy very likely)
All you need is to prop up consumer spending somehow. Main deflationary risk right now is that people might choose to reduce discretionary spending and it would hurt prices of nontradables and services. Falling dollar is good because it puts more dollars in the hands of workers of exporting industries. Tax cuts or bailouts will work toward this end too.
Once you cause/induce reasonable perception/suspicion that US $ is not valuable, inflation has to kick in.
Inflation will kick in regardless of perception whether the US$ is valuable. This is a complex issue, anyway. It’s not enough to think that the US $ is valuable. You also need a good valuable alternative.
And infation in reality, i.e. not “core inflation” is WAY up. Anyone recall what milk was a year ago?
Inflation indexes include three broad categories of goods/services – non-discretionary tradable goods (milk, wheat, oil), discretionary tradable goods (cars, electronics, apparel), and nontradables (hotels, car insurance, restaurants). U.S. economy is 70% third category. Consumer retrenchment will not lead to consumers cutting down on milk. It will mean that more people stop travelling, buying car insurance and eating in restaurants. Thus decreasing prices of restaurant meals and hotel rooms, leaving some fraction of people in the restaurant and hotel business unemployed. Thus further lowering the amount of money available for discretionary spending. That’s the kind of deflation everyone is afraid of.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.