- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by bsrsharma.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 27, 2007 at 7:21 PM #10068August 27, 2007 at 8:37 PM #81827The OC ScamParticipant
I have noticed that here in the OC also!!
Our property has gained 5 percent in the last few months with no high sales but only lower prices??
The comparable homes section only reflects higher sale from last summer 2006. Another thing I don’t understand is the stating higher priced home sales from Feb 2007 which are bigger homes in a better part of our zipcode?
Engineered for price gain only?
August 27, 2007 at 8:37 PM #81962The OC ScamParticipantI have noticed that here in the OC also!!
Our property has gained 5 percent in the last few months with no high sales but only lower prices??
The comparable homes section only reflects higher sale from last summer 2006. Another thing I don’t understand is the stating higher priced home sales from Feb 2007 which are bigger homes in a better part of our zipcode?
Engineered for price gain only?
August 27, 2007 at 8:37 PM #81979The OC ScamParticipantI have noticed that here in the OC also!!
Our property has gained 5 percent in the last few months with no high sales but only lower prices??
The comparable homes section only reflects higher sale from last summer 2006. Another thing I don’t understand is the stating higher priced home sales from Feb 2007 which are bigger homes in a better part of our zipcode?
Engineered for price gain only?
August 27, 2007 at 10:16 PM #81848bsrsharmaParticipantI have seen these problems with Zestimates
1. They appear sticky on the down trend since the prices are dropping faster than their algorithm can assimilate new prices into the system
2. Some data are just plain wrong. I see many sharp upswings and downswings where either they have bad data or the algorithm is choking on non-existing data (like using 0 for input data when data isn’t available)
3. In some cases I have seen it shows sharp upswings but gradual downward slopes, giving an impression that they are eager to increase the zestimates but reluctant to lower them.
I think, on the whole, it is still an immature model.
August 27, 2007 at 10:16 PM #81983bsrsharmaParticipantI have seen these problems with Zestimates
1. They appear sticky on the down trend since the prices are dropping faster than their algorithm can assimilate new prices into the system
2. Some data are just plain wrong. I see many sharp upswings and downswings where either they have bad data or the algorithm is choking on non-existing data (like using 0 for input data when data isn’t available)
3. In some cases I have seen it shows sharp upswings but gradual downward slopes, giving an impression that they are eager to increase the zestimates but reluctant to lower them.
I think, on the whole, it is still an immature model.
August 27, 2007 at 10:16 PM #82000bsrsharmaParticipantI have seen these problems with Zestimates
1. They appear sticky on the down trend since the prices are dropping faster than their algorithm can assimilate new prices into the system
2. Some data are just plain wrong. I see many sharp upswings and downswings where either they have bad data or the algorithm is choking on non-existing data (like using 0 for input data when data isn’t available)
3. In some cases I have seen it shows sharp upswings but gradual downward slopes, giving an impression that they are eager to increase the zestimates but reluctant to lower them.
I think, on the whole, it is still an immature model.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.