Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Sensible rules proposed for mortgage industry
- This topic has 125 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by Scarlett.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 6, 2011 at 10:04 PM #685576April 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM #684417briansd1Guest
[quote=AN][quote=briansd1]
The limit should be low because housing subsidy should be for basic shelter, not fancy houses.[/quote]
$250k can buy you a mcMansion in some area and a 800 sq-ft shack in another. Which do you consider a fancy house?[/quote]Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.
If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?
April 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM #684465briansd1Guest[quote=AN][quote=briansd1]
The limit should be low because housing subsidy should be for basic shelter, not fancy houses.[/quote]
$250k can buy you a mcMansion in some area and a 800 sq-ft shack in another. Which do you consider a fancy house?[/quote]Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.
If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?
April 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM #685094briansd1Guest[quote=AN][quote=briansd1]
The limit should be low because housing subsidy should be for basic shelter, not fancy houses.[/quote]
$250k can buy you a mcMansion in some area and a 800 sq-ft shack in another. Which do you consider a fancy house?[/quote]Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.
If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?
April 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM #685235briansd1Guest[quote=AN][quote=briansd1]
The limit should be low because housing subsidy should be for basic shelter, not fancy houses.[/quote]
$250k can buy you a mcMansion in some area and a 800 sq-ft shack in another. Which do you consider a fancy house?[/quote]Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.
If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?
April 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM #685586briansd1Guest[quote=AN][quote=briansd1]
The limit should be low because housing subsidy should be for basic shelter, not fancy houses.[/quote]
$250k can buy you a mcMansion in some area and a 800 sq-ft shack in another. Which do you consider a fancy house?[/quote]Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.
If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?
April 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM #684422anParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?[/quote]
Again, do you think people who buy a 3000 sq-ft house should get government subsidy? We should lower the government subsidy to $60k. That will buy you a starter home in a cheap area. If you’re going to draw a line, then why allow a line high enough to allow any kind of McMansion?April 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM #684470anParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?[/quote]
Again, do you think people who buy a 3000 sq-ft house should get government subsidy? We should lower the government subsidy to $60k. That will buy you a starter home in a cheap area. If you’re going to draw a line, then why allow a line high enough to allow any kind of McMansion?April 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM #685099anParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?[/quote]
Again, do you think people who buy a 3000 sq-ft house should get government subsidy? We should lower the government subsidy to $60k. That will buy you a starter home in a cheap area. If you’re going to draw a line, then why allow a line high enough to allow any kind of McMansion?April 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM #685240anParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?[/quote]
Again, do you think people who buy a 3000 sq-ft house should get government subsidy? We should lower the government subsidy to $60k. That will buy you a starter home in a cheap area. If you’re going to draw a line, then why allow a line high enough to allow any kind of McMansion?April 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM #685591anParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Like I said, subsidy is for a max limit. An arbitrary limit needs to be set because everybody cannot be accomodated.If a buyer wants to a better house, he can move to a lower cost area, or use his own resources (without subsidy) to buy in a high-cost area.
Why do people who can afford to buy houses expect a hand out from the government in the form of loan subsidies?[/quote]
Again, do you think people who buy a 3000 sq-ft house should get government subsidy? We should lower the government subsidy to $60k. That will buy you a starter home in a cheap area. If you’re going to draw a line, then why allow a line high enough to allow any kind of McMansion?April 6, 2011 at 10:31 PM #684427paramountParticipantYah, let’s prevent the same people who had to pay for bank bailouts from owning a house.
The rules stated in the article are far to stringent.
The following basic guidelines make sense (although each situation should be treated uniquely):
Credit Score: 650 and above
Down Payment: Anything below 20% pays PMI
Income Ratio: 36% Gross Income to Loan AmountApril 6, 2011 at 10:31 PM #684475paramountParticipantYah, let’s prevent the same people who had to pay for bank bailouts from owning a house.
The rules stated in the article are far to stringent.
The following basic guidelines make sense (although each situation should be treated uniquely):
Credit Score: 650 and above
Down Payment: Anything below 20% pays PMI
Income Ratio: 36% Gross Income to Loan AmountApril 6, 2011 at 10:31 PM #685104paramountParticipantYah, let’s prevent the same people who had to pay for bank bailouts from owning a house.
The rules stated in the article are far to stringent.
The following basic guidelines make sense (although each situation should be treated uniquely):
Credit Score: 650 and above
Down Payment: Anything below 20% pays PMI
Income Ratio: 36% Gross Income to Loan AmountApril 6, 2011 at 10:31 PM #685245paramountParticipantYah, let’s prevent the same people who had to pay for bank bailouts from owning a house.
The rules stated in the article are far to stringent.
The following basic guidelines make sense (although each situation should be treated uniquely):
Credit Score: 650 and above
Down Payment: Anything below 20% pays PMI
Income Ratio: 36% Gross Income to Loan Amount -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.