Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Sellers were plaintiffs in class action lawsuit
- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2009 at 9:21 PM #457896September 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM #457636infoseekerParticipant
thanks again…. one main question is am i required to disclose about this if I were to sell this home again. Also generally do homes with such disclosures have issues with resale.
September 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM #457709infoseekerParticipantthanks again…. one main question is am i required to disclose about this if I were to sell this home again. Also generally do homes with such disclosures have issues with resale.
September 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM #457295infoseekerParticipantthanks again…. one main question is am i required to disclose about this if I were to sell this home again. Also generally do homes with such disclosures have issues with resale.
September 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM #457100infoseekerParticipantthanks again…. one main question is am i required to disclose about this if I were to sell this home again. Also generally do homes with such disclosures have issues with resale.
September 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM #457901infoseekerParticipantthanks again…. one main question is am i required to disclose about this if I were to sell this home again. Also generally do homes with such disclosures have issues with resale.
September 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM #457723SK in CVParticipantThat’s two good questions!! But not being a real estate attorney nor a broker, I don’t know the answers to either question. I suspect you are only required to disclose what you know. If you learn that the defects are significant, you probably won’t want to buy the house. If you learn they’re insignificant there’s nothing to disclose. But get better advice before you sell the house you haven’t purchased yet π
September 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM #457914SK in CVParticipantThat’s two good questions!! But not being a real estate attorney nor a broker, I don’t know the answers to either question. I suspect you are only required to disclose what you know. If you learn that the defects are significant, you probably won’t want to buy the house. If you learn they’re insignificant there’s nothing to disclose. But get better advice before you sell the house you haven’t purchased yet π
September 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM #457115SK in CVParticipantThat’s two good questions!! But not being a real estate attorney nor a broker, I don’t know the answers to either question. I suspect you are only required to disclose what you know. If you learn that the defects are significant, you probably won’t want to buy the house. If you learn they’re insignificant there’s nothing to disclose. But get better advice before you sell the house you haven’t purchased yet π
September 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM #457651SK in CVParticipantThat’s two good questions!! But not being a real estate attorney nor a broker, I don’t know the answers to either question. I suspect you are only required to disclose what you know. If you learn that the defects are significant, you probably won’t want to buy the house. If you learn they’re insignificant there’s nothing to disclose. But get better advice before you sell the house you haven’t purchased yet π
September 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM #457310SK in CVParticipantThat’s two good questions!! But not being a real estate attorney nor a broker, I don’t know the answers to either question. I suspect you are only required to disclose what you know. If you learn that the defects are significant, you probably won’t want to buy the house. If you learn they’re insignificant there’s nothing to disclose. But get better advice before you sell the house you haven’t purchased yet π
September 15, 2009 at 10:04 PM #457665bsrsharmaParticipantam i required to disclose about this
Yes.
We bought a home that was involved in a similar suit about water logging, drainage and resultant differential settlement (of soil) issues. We were given a few microfilm reels of legal paperwork during disclosure (the litigation happened in the ’80s). Being a nerd, I even went to a library and read some of the microfilms and concluded most of the issues litigated were fairly minor. The seller got an award and used it to put some french drains. When we sold the house, we disclosed and handed over the microfilm reels (not sure if the buyers understood what to do with them; This was in 2005, when microfilm was obsolete).
The important thing is, our agent asked us if there was any lawsuit regarding our property and wanted enough information so that we were all on safe ground with respect to disclosure.
September 15, 2009 at 10:04 PM #457929bsrsharmaParticipantam i required to disclose about this
Yes.
We bought a home that was involved in a similar suit about water logging, drainage and resultant differential settlement (of soil) issues. We were given a few microfilm reels of legal paperwork during disclosure (the litigation happened in the ’80s). Being a nerd, I even went to a library and read some of the microfilms and concluded most of the issues litigated were fairly minor. The seller got an award and used it to put some french drains. When we sold the house, we disclosed and handed over the microfilm reels (not sure if the buyers understood what to do with them; This was in 2005, when microfilm was obsolete).
The important thing is, our agent asked us if there was any lawsuit regarding our property and wanted enough information so that we were all on safe ground with respect to disclosure.
September 15, 2009 at 10:04 PM #457325bsrsharmaParticipantam i required to disclose about this
Yes.
We bought a home that was involved in a similar suit about water logging, drainage and resultant differential settlement (of soil) issues. We were given a few microfilm reels of legal paperwork during disclosure (the litigation happened in the ’80s). Being a nerd, I even went to a library and read some of the microfilms and concluded most of the issues litigated were fairly minor. The seller got an award and used it to put some french drains. When we sold the house, we disclosed and handed over the microfilm reels (not sure if the buyers understood what to do with them; This was in 2005, when microfilm was obsolete).
The important thing is, our agent asked us if there was any lawsuit regarding our property and wanted enough information so that we were all on safe ground with respect to disclosure.
September 15, 2009 at 10:04 PM #457130bsrsharmaParticipantam i required to disclose about this
Yes.
We bought a home that was involved in a similar suit about water logging, drainage and resultant differential settlement (of soil) issues. We were given a few microfilm reels of legal paperwork during disclosure (the litigation happened in the ’80s). Being a nerd, I even went to a library and read some of the microfilms and concluded most of the issues litigated were fairly minor. The seller got an award and used it to put some french drains. When we sold the house, we disclosed and handed over the microfilm reels (not sure if the buyers understood what to do with them; This was in 2005, when microfilm was obsolete).
The important thing is, our agent asked us if there was any lawsuit regarding our property and wanted enough information so that we were all on safe ground with respect to disclosure.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.